[h=1]
Ex-Stormy Daniels lawyer says Fox News had 'factually specific' details of alleged affair with Trump[/h]
Ex-Stormy Daniels lawyer says Fox News had 'factually specific' details of alleged affair with Trump | TheHill
A former lawyer for Stormy Daniels said Monday that a Fox News reporter obtained "factually specific" information about an alleged affair between the adult-film star and President Trump before the 2016 presidential election.
I can tell you that Diana Falzone, who is a New York-based Fox reporter, had the story, Keith Davidson, who negotiated a deal in which Daniels received $130,000, told ABC News.
I don't know how she got it, but I do know that I received a comment call from Diana Falzone that was factually specific ... the day or two after 'Access Hollywood,' Davidson added, referring to a tape of Trump making lewd comments about women that was released about a month before the 2016 election.
Davidson said he declined to comment for Falzone's story, adding that he wasn't aware why the news network never ran a report on the alleged affair.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(mine)
Why would it matter if Fox Network knew about the Stormy Daniels hush money payments and buried the story? It matters a whole lot and here's why. Rupert Murdoch wanted Trump to win and he intentionally killed the story. Former Fox News reporter, Diana Falzone, is bound legally by and NDA agreement with Fox unless it is nullified by the courts or until she gets a subpoena to testify to this fact. This would lead to questions as to whether Fox News is a legitimate news organization or was it clearly a campaign arm of Donald Trump and whether killing this story could be considered an illegal campaign contribution. Trump won the electoral college by 78,000 votes. Would 78,000 Evangelicals vote for him if they knew about these affairs and hush money payoffs for a porn star before the election?