• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"I am not for impeachment," Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

American said:
Hello??? Did you forget the Obama presidency? :lamo :lamo
Click to expand...

Whataboutism? Should I be shocked?
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Buzz62 said:
Blame themmmmm...for what?
A blind eyeeeee...to what?
WTF are you trying to say?
Do you even know?
Click to expand...

Seems they are not the only blind ones.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Airyaman said:
False.

The only ones to cry foul will be the same 33-37% as usual.

You know, Trump's base.
Click to expand...

Nope. Everybody, including you, sees through this ridiculous political exercise as nothing more than that.

And it's killing you guys, so by all means, please continue.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Erod said:
Nope. Everybody, including you, sees through this ridiculous political exercise as nothing more than that.

And it's killing you guys, so by all means, please continue.
Click to expand...

Seriously, the only ones who care watch Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity. Do you have evidence to suggest otherwise?
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

PIPEWRENCH said:
I don't believe that. I think if evidence was presented supporting the original witch hunt they would impeach. I am glad that they are not willing to impeach over a fishing expedition with nothing to support this calamity we have had to endure for the past 2 years. Pelosi has surprised me by allowing intelligence to make her decision rather than bias hate.
Click to expand...

Nobody who made it through 2017 and 2018 believes there is a single thing Trump could do to make Republicans agree to remove him from office. You can claim otherwise, but absolutely nobody will believe you.

How long did you think we'd keep trying to kick that football?
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

ttwtt78640 said:
What, other than the bolded above, is a "never Trumper"?
Click to expand...
A never Trumper is someone who disagrees with him just for the sake of disagreeing with him.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Airyaman said:
You throw those words around like you think you know what they mean in these applications. Does not appear so.

There is no "due process" in Congress. Toss that out. That is a legal phrase.

As for "constitutionalism", oversight is one of the implied powers of Congress. There is no violation of the Constitution there.
Click to expand...



Perhaps you have not been paying attention lately.

Public opinion is not a courtroom and democrats have been attempting to treat it as such with a high volume combination of innuendo and outright lies supported by a gleeful media.



The Kavanaugh debacle cost the Democrats the Senate

The Media Lied to Punish Kids for Wearing MAGA Hats

How Team Hillary played the press for fools on Russia

'Empire' actor Jussie Smollett indicted on 16 felony counts by grand jury

The left and mainstream media are creating chaos

At Best, The FBI Misled The Court To Wiretap Trump Campaign, FISA Application Shows

Manufacturing an unwarranted investigation is indeed a crime and having it done by an "apolitical" institution is damaging to their credibility.

This is incisive enough.

 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

OscarLevant said:
If they have probable cause, and they do, then the are doing their constitutionally required jobs.
Click to expand...

The said they had probable cause to spy on Carter Page based upon the lies in the democrat dossier bought by Hillary. They were not just wrong, they were deliberately lying and now Carter Page is suing them for their savage violation of his civil rights.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Cardinal said:
Nobody who made it through 2017 and 2018 believes there is a single thing Trump could do to make Republicans agree to remove him from office. You can claim otherwise, but absolutely nobody will believe you.

How long did you think we'd keep trying to kick that football?
Click to expand...

Clearly we have a difference of opinion. I remember when the republican party was not going to support Trump even after he won the primaries. If they had one party puppet they thought they could push down the peoples throat they would have. The democrats found out with Hillary the people were tired of having party puppets forced down their throat. That is one of the main reasons Trump beat her.

If they come up with any real evidence that Trump rigged the election I still think the Republicans will send him packing. But it has to be something besides what most presidents have already gotten away with in the past. They won't railroad him like the democrats tried to do.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

PIPEWRENCH said:
Clearly we have a difference of opinion. I remember when the republican party was not going to support Trump even after he won the primaries. If they had one party puppet they thought they could push down the peoples throat they would have. The democrats found out with Hillary the people were tired of having party puppets forced down their throat. That is one of the main reasons Trump beat her.

If they come up with any real evidence that Trump rigged the election I still think the Republicans will send him packing. But it has to be something besides what most presidents have already gotten away with in the past. They won't railroad him like the democrats tried to do.
Click to expand...

No they won't. This is populism.
 
Erod said:
‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats



No collusion. No impeachment. No nothing.

Just not going your way, eh libs?

This is actually smart. Democrats are circling the drain right because of Ocasio-Cortez, Kamala, Oman, Booker, Bernie, etc, and this would only put 10 more nails in the coffin.
Click to expand...

Smart and prudent. Absent COMPELLING EVIDENCE and BI-PARTISAN support, impeachment would fail. I am not sure that there is a threshold Trump could meet that would compel Republicans to impeach. Not these Republicans. It is a vastly different party than it was in Nixon's day.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

trixare4kids said:
You don't know that.
What if Mueller's report shows treason which exceeds the threshold of “high crimes & misdemeanors"? Do you really think that lowly of the Republicans?
Click to expand...

These Republicans? Oh yes! And with very good reason.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Olddemocrat said:
These Republicans? Oh yes! And with very good reason.
Click to expand...

Please expound on your point above.
If you are going to tell me you hate Trump, don't bother wasting my time.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Mongidig said:
All the "Never Trumpers" on here have pushed for impeachment. Who would have thought that Pelosi would be the voice of reason in the Democratic party! It's a sad sate of affairs over there. The pro impeachment people need to learn what qualifies for impeachment before acting like idiots.
Click to expand...

what qualifies for impeachment and what results in impeachment are very different things
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

akyron said:
Perhaps you have not been paying attention lately.

Public opinion is not a courtroom and democrats have been attempting to treat it as such with a high volume combination of innuendo and outright lies supported by a gleeful media.



The Kavanaugh debacle cost the Democrats the Senate

The Media Lied to Punish Kids for Wearing MAGA Hats

How Team Hillary played the press for fools on Russia

'Empire' actor Jussie Smollett indicted on 16 felony counts by grand jury

The left and mainstream media are creating chaos

At Best, The FBI Misled The Court To Wiretap Trump Campaign, FISA Application Shows

Manufacturing an unwarranted investigation is indeed a crime and having it done by an "apolitical" institution is damaging to their credibility.

This is incisive enough.

Click to expand...


Don't care bout your unrelated silly links.

There are no "unwarranted investigations". Trump and those around him have been the swampiest bunch in decades. The only people who do not believe this administration is not corrupt are his base. Everyone else is on board.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Buzz62 said:
Blame themmmmm...for what?
A blind eyeeeee...to what?
WTF are you trying to say?
Do you even know?
Click to expand...

It is ill mannered to silence a fool and cruelty to allow him to continue. This is one of those times when I am torn between being rude or cruel. As there is no mechanism for being ill mannered I can do naught but be cruel. Please continue, shower us with more of your pearls of wisdom.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Airyaman said:
Seems they are not the only blind ones.
Click to expand...

No no...come on. You tell me what I'm missing here.
You said the GOP turned "a blind eye to everything." Everything...what?
You said "Blame them"...I blame the GOP for several things in the past...and I've never really liked McConnell...but "Blame them" for what? It sounds like you have some pretty harsh accusations. What exactly are they? Can you even articulate what's got you so hot and bothered?
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Buzz62 said:
No no...come on. You tell me what I'm missing here.
You said the GOP turned "a blind eye to everything." Everything...what?
You said "Blame them"...I blame the GOP for several things in the past...and I've never really liked McConnell...but "Blame them" for what? It sounds like you have some pretty harsh accusations. What exactly are they? Can you even articulate what's got you so hot and bothered?
Click to expand...

Nothing has me "hot and bothered" over this stuff.

Trump and his administration have been violating ethics rules since he has been in office. On top of that, Trump's potential violation of the Emolument's clause should be investigated. These are starting points, and now that we know, Kushner and Ivanka's background should be investigated to learn why they were not recommended for security clearances to be sure they are not a risk to national security.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Olddemocrat said:
It is ill mannered to silence a fool and cruelty to allow him to continue. This is one of those times when I am torn between being rude or cruel. As there is no mechanism for being ill mannered I can do naught but be cruel. Please continue, shower us with more of your pearls of wisdom.
Click to expand...

Better men have tried.
But go ahead...indulge yourself.

And while you do...
Tell me exactly what you figure Trump needs to be impeached for?
Something you know that Meuller hasn't been able to dig up?

Trump didn't start this bitch-fight. That would be the Libbies. The day after he was elected, war was declared. The media...the Dumbocrats en suite...and the SJW public who couldn't stand the idea of a man like Trump in the WH. Hell black people are now feigning racial attacks. People who, right up till Trump was elected, were in favour of a wall along the southern border, all the sudden found "morality". Ya...Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi have great "morality". :lamo

What exactly makes you all so nasty? So annoying? What has this guy done, that's got all you people acting like you all hold the keys to morality and wisdom? Is it that, if you try to make your arguments without the morality lectures, that your arguments all fall apart and sound childish?

So come on...knock yourself out.
What has REALLY got you all so hot and bothered? Do you know?
Or do you need to consult with Don Lemon first...
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

I'm so happy we will have at least two more years of President Trump,maybe six more if my Rebublican brethren do their job.These are exciting times.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Airyaman said:
Nothing has me "hot and bothered" over this stuff.

Trump and his administration have been violating ethics rules since he has been in office. On top of that, Trump's potential violation of the Emolument's clause should be investigated. These are starting points, and now that we know, Kushner and Ivanka's background should be investigated to learn why they were not recommended for security clearances to be sure they are not a risk to national security.
Click to expand...

That's it?

OK...what ethics rules do you see as having been violated?

Trump's "potential" violation of the Emolument's clause? You don't think Meuller's done a whiz-bang job then?

Kushner and Ivanka's background? One's a realestate guy who's possibly got some credit issues, and the other is Trump's daughter. Should they have security clearances? Hell if I know. But after the entire left declared war on him, I don't really blame Trump for wanting his own family close.

So is this it? This is what drives you to fight on endlessly against the President? To tear the nation in 2? To destroy the lives of all sorts of people, for either completely unrelated issues and sometimes rather sketchy methods employed? To attempt to destroy a judge...just because Trump nominated him? To insist...way beyond all rational thought...that walls don't work and have somehow acquired some sort of moral quality?

I was kind of hoping you could do better because if this is it...dude you got issues.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

marke said:
The said they had probable cause to spy on Carter Page based upon the lies in the democrat dossier bought by Hillary. They were not just wrong, they were deliberately lying and now Carter Page is suing them for their savage violation of his civil rights.
Click to expand...



The FBI took an interest in Carter Page long before the dossier and the Trump campaign

FBI Interest in Trump Aide Carter Page Predated Campaign - The Atlantic

...the FBI had been investigating Page’s ties to Russian intelligence for years.
Click to expand...


The law suit won't win, the dossier was not published with malicious intent on Page.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

OscarLevant said:
The FBI took an interest in Carter Page long before the dossier and the Trump campaign

FBI Interest in Trump Aide Carter Page Predated Campaign - The Atlantic
The law suit won't win, the dossier was not published with malicious intent on Page.
Click to expand...

Democrats bought the lying dossier knowing it was filled with lies. Insiders at the DOJ friendly to Hillary and hostile to Trump illegally used the lying dossier to gain court authorization to spy on Trump and associates. Now that the truth is finally coming out about the secret corruption of those promoting and protecting the lying dossier those corrupt bums are in deep doo-doo.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

marke said:
Democrats bought the lying dossier knowing it was filled with lies. Insiders at the DOJ friendly to Hillary and hostile to Trump illegally used the lying dossier to gain court authorization to spy on Trump and associates. Now that the truth is finally coming out about the secret corruption of those promoting and protecting the lying dossier those corrupt bums are in deep doo-doo.
Click to expand...

Wow, you have been seriously indoctrinated.
 
Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Maybe Nancy knows Donald better than most of us.

Paul Szep, Creators Syndicate.jpg
cartoon by Paul Szep, Creators Syndicate
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom