"I am not for impeachment," Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Oborosen said:

I recognize your inability to actually have an intelligent conversation.

Good luck in whatever endeavor you're actually capable of. Because I've since stopped caring for this stupidity of yours.

Click to expand...

One cannot have an "intelligent conversation" with a person who is unable to see the real world. One cannot deny the stupidity of those who refuse to acknowledge reality.

Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Somerville said:

One cannot have an "intelligent conversation" with a person who is unable to see the real world. One cannot deny the stupidity of those who refuse to acknowledge reality.

Click to expand...

You would actually have to be correct in such an assumption first, for that to be true. Then again.
I never expected you to be correct about anything at all.

Which is only confirmed more so by your post.

Now to you actually have a point to make?
Because this repeated whining of yours. Is starting to bore me.

Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Oborosen said:

You would actually have to be correct in such an assumption first, for that to be true. Then again.
I never expected you to be correct about anything at all.

Which is only confirmed more so by your post.

Now to you actually have a point to make?
Because this repeated whining of yours. Is starting to bore me.

Click to expand...

One cannot have an "intelligent conversation" with a person who is unable to see the real world. One cannot deny the stupidity of those who refuse to acknowledge reality.

MY "repeated whining"? :lamo :2rofll:

Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Somerville said:

One cannot have an "intelligent conversation" with a person who is unable to see the real world. One cannot deny the stupidity of those who refuse to acknowledge reality.

MY "repeated whining"? :lamo :2rofll:

Click to expand...

Yes, seeing as you've basically just repeated yourself a few times now. I'm more than validated with calling it repeated whining.

So, can you please stop whining and actually try your hand at having this "intellectual conversation" that you keep crying about, or is this the extent of what you're currently capable of?

Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

Somerville said:

This is hilarious - accusing me of "defending story lines which are not true" when you are unable to find backup for any of your claims.
Once again with added emphasis
"Hillary hired Glenn Simpson" Prove it Actually, it was Fusion Inc. which hired Christopher Steele.

Click to expand...

Let me clarify then. The Hillary campaign hired Fusion GP, headed by Glenn Simpson, to find dirt in Trump and Fusion GP hired Trump-hater Christopher Steel to fabricate the infamous unverified (lying) dossier.

Provide the links in which "Steele, Comey, McCabe, Lisa Page, and others said (the dossier) was unverified" Unverified does not mean "not true"

Click to expand...

Everybody of consequence at the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Justice Department understood fully in the middle of 2016 - as the FBI embarked on its counterintelligence probe of Donald Trump - that it was doing so based on disinformation provided by Hillary Clinton's campaign. "Everybody Knew" WSJ Exposes Bruce Ohr's Shocking Admission To The FBI | Zero Hedge

"Crooked Trump haters" did not use the Steele dossier and nothing else to obtain the first FISA warrant on Carter Page - AFTER Page had left the Trump campaign.

Click to expand...

You say what some people are saying but not what investigators have found out.

We do not have Strzok and Lisa Page's testimony verifying any "crooked operations". If you think we do, provide the quotes and page numbers of the transcripts.

Click to expand...

Wait for the full report to come out after the special prosecutor looking into democrat corruption in the 2016 election is finished.

Personally, i don't think you can find any support other than your favored websites. I've read thru Strzok's testimony and failed to find support for the words posted in a Fox News story. I could be wrong but for some reason, tRump minions haven't provided evidence.

Click to expand...

You are looking in the wrong place. You need to read Lisa Page's testimony before investigators who asked her about Strzok's admissions in emails.

The purpose of an investigation is to determine the truth or falsity of claims made about persons or institutions. What we do know at this time is the fact that multiple Trump associates have admitted their guilt. Others who have been indicted are not Americans and at least one American corporation owned by a "sovereign government" is fighting Mueller in the court in an effort to avoid turning over documents.

Click to expand...

Trump associates have not admitted anything closely related to Trump's supposed Russian collusion. There was no Russian collusion in the Trump campaign. That was a lie started by the Hillary campaign in a desperate effort to derail Trump's popular train to the White House.

Re: ‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats