• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ocasio-Cortez, chief of staff illegally moved $885K in campaign contributions 'off the books,' FEC c

What is the FEC for if not to investigate/enforce election related laws? Relying on legislators to enforce the laws is as goofy (and counter to the Constitution) as relying on the executive to allocate funding.

Where'd you get the notion of enforce? We expect them to follow the law.
 
And exactly which od the Wikileaked emails from the DNC came from Hillary's illegal homebrewed email server?

There were Russian hacking attempts immediately after cheeto made that speech.
 
Thanks for sharing your opinion.

You obviously agree. It’s difficult not to, for the first 6 paragraphs are indisputable.

If they are disputable, please illustrate how.

Paragraph 7 is analysis based on past behavior. I mean... look at you folks defend Criminal Hillary. Felonious Bill.
 
I'd probably rephrase that to what's bad for Republicans is bad for Democrats, but that'd be splitting hairs. ;)

Investigate the crap out of her, and her chief of staff. Do it now, do it speedily, and put this to bed one way or the other. This should be the response any time a politician is implicated in shadiness while acting on your / our / whoever's behalf. I know it sucks to think you (universal you being used here) might have been wrong, but everyone gets duped from time to time, the easiest way to re-cover one's ass is to continue to stand up for the ideals that made you like them in the first place, even if it puts you at odds with who they turned out to be. :shrug:

Something is fundamentally wrong with a process (system?) which requires spending many millions simply to apply for a (2 year) job that pays less than half a million. In her district, as in many, whoever wins the party primary will win the general election. Any campaign money raised after winning the primary is then basically up for grabs - having little (if any) effect on the general election outcome.
 
As you wish. I don't care about either AOC or Trump.

I think that AOC has a lot of developing to do, as I said. As for Trump, he is a national embarrassment.
 
Investigate her and her Campaign Manager thoroughly.

This setup looks pretty bad. It seems the setup was intended to deceive.

Now we know where she got the cash for those $3500 suits.
Aren't campaign donations just like bartender tips lots and lots of tips?
 
You obviously agree. It’s difficult not to, for the first 6 paragraphs are indisputable.

If they are disputable, please illustrate how.

Paragraph 7 is analysis based on past behavior. I mean... look at you folks defend Criminal Hillary. Felonious Bill.

On what convictions do you base your libels?
 
Last edited:
You obviously agree. It’s difficult not to, for the first 6 paragraphs are indisputable.

If they are disputable, please illustrate how.

Paragraph 7 is analysis based on past behavior. I mean... look at you folks defend Criminal Hillary. Felonious Bill.

I don't agree with you about much.
 
I think that AOC has a lot of developing to do, as I said. As for Trump, he is a national embarrassment.

Her most dangerous opponents are fact checkers. By the end of 2019 she will be a punchline.
We agree about Trump.
 
I think that AOC has a lot of developing to do, as I said. As for Trump, he is a national embarrassment.

She’s developed. She’s a 29-year old Congressman.

She is the leader of the Democrat Party, “The Boss”. “The future”.

She helped kill Amazon bringing jobs and billion to NY.

She created the New Communist Deal.

All this in 60-days.
###

Trump eliminated Obama’s legacy in 14-months. He’s decimated ISIS. NATO allies are ponying up. NK has stopped firing missiles over Japan. China is being brought to their knees. He’s got the economy roaring. The feckless, moronic Iran Deal has been scrapped. USMCA agreement. TPP trashed. Paris trashed.

Awesome :)

If only Obama was so incompetent, such an embarrassment... ROTFLOL.
 
I think that AOC has a lot of developing to do, as I said. As for Trump, he is a national embarrassment.
Yes she does need to get more sophisticated at breaking FEC law.
 
Ocasio-Cortez, chief of staff illegally moved $885K in campaign contributions 'off the books,' FEC complaint alleges

Ocasio-Cortez, chief of staff illegally moved $885K in campaign contributions '''off the books,''' FEC complaint alleges | Fox News


Looks like Ms Polly Perfect has an ethics problem in her office. And wasn't she railing against this very thing? Is this the good part of socialism we've heard so much about, transparency?

She doesn't have an office ethics problem, she has an ethics problem. She's just as culpable as he is in this.
 
This is fake news.

Her campaign filing list a total of $5580 in payments to the Justice Democrats

Schedule B for ALL Line #'s

And even if all of the alleged "facts " in the article were true, which they aren't, it is the Justice Democrats who transferred money to the LLCs

AOC does not control the Justice Democrats
 
Only Trump is above the law, damnit!

I really enjoy Leftists making such claims but offering zero evidence. Try offering some.

We know Hillary was above the law, and the FBI and DoJ were corrupted in service of her illegalities.
 
Where'd you get the notion of enforce? We expect them to follow the law.

My objection is to expecting demorats (or republicants) in congress to purge/police their own members. It seems that, in this case, the wrongdoing was (entirely?) by the campaign chief of staff - perhaps with little (or no) help from the candidate. Trump, no doubt, has hired some shady characters to work for him but does that fact make Trump guilty of actions that those others took allegedly on his behalf?
 
There were Russian hacking attempts immediately after cheeto made that speech.
There were Russian hacking attempts before he made that sarcastic statement too. So what? Also Hillary says her server was never hacked.
 
Back
Top Bottom