- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Not according to the Department of Justice.
They lied.
Not according to the Department of Justice.
Manafort colluded with the Russians during the campaign. But, collusion is not a crime, so it logically follows that he cannot be charged with that.
Do you know everything in the Mueller report?? If you don't how can you claim to know there's no crime??'
But hey no bias on your part, right?
I already told you that collusion is not a crime. Indictment opens the door to investigation.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, combine that with Clapper's statement ( Mueller report may be ‘anti-climactic,' says ex-intelligence director | TheHill ) that
and what we have is a signal to prepare yourselves to either say "See ... there was nothing" or "He's guilty ... they just didn't have enough proof"
Round and round we'll still go ... but we already knew that, didn't we?
Yes, I keep pumping facts. I explained how indictments work in my other post. You can read it there.
Big question. How much are we going to see? With Barr acting as a filter I have my doubts we're going to know the whole truth any time soon.
You can't even imagine how utterly moronic is that statement. You might as well have asked if a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?
What cause did Mueller have of a crime that Manafort commited to open an indictment?
:2rofll::2rofll::2rofll:
Big question. How much are we going to see? With Barr acting as a filter I have my doubts we're going to know the whole truth any time soon.
No, we won't...Congress will have to fight tooth and nail to reveal it to the public who paid for it.
What cause did Mueller have of a crime that Manafort commited to open an indictment?
Maybe I’m misunderstanding you. How would the RNC have that information during the campaign? I guess I don’t understand what exactly you are arguing.
In the beginning, when Manafort's name was first mentioned in connection with the Mueller investigation, some news media were reporting that Manafort had been on the FBI's radar for almost 10 years for money laundering. However, nothing was done during all that time. The media also stopped reporting that piece of info.
Which leads me to believe that the FBI is still working the way it was intended to when first "created" a little over 100 years ago: amass info on wealthy and powerful people but don't use it until a "political reason" calls for it.
The only way we'll know that everything is legit is if the report concludes impeachable offenses.
Read it yourself (I know you won’t):
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000015f-6d73-d751-af7f-7f735cc70000
I've found this to be the best breakdown so far of what this could all mean.
The Hoarse Whisperer on Twitter: "Okay, I’ve been thinking about possible explanations for Mueller wrapping up and delivering a report as soon as next week.
Here’s the most plausible take I have come up with...
...and it’s more positive than negative.
1/"
Sorry I know it may sound confusing.
1) The DNC & RNC as well as the FBI had probes and accusations prior to the 2016 elections Already
2) The same above AFTER the elections were still probing Trump
3) CURRENT date, Lets just say since 2015 TRUMP has been under some RADAR of Intelligence as well as law enforcement.
I cant imagine the RNC or and Republican Support of Trump. IF TRUE is NOT aware of TRUMP being a Foreign agent of Russia. With that if there was FACTUAL evidence. for 4 years now. These Republicans as we know NO democrat supports TRUMP period. IF in fact there is factual evidence...WHY would the RNC or republicans SUPPORT trump. IT would be in the nations best Interest to REMOVE TRUMP Period. At that point it has NO political leaning is national security.
4 years of background time to find anything. But Mueller's report wont be a bombshell It wont indicate collusion it will indicate financial crimes and other NON Russia related crimes.
Russian Collussion is a "Witch Hunt" YES RUSSIA themselves acted. I do NOT Think Trump coherently participated, agreed or paid any Russians.
Trump is a scumbag, banged pornstarts. Has bad financial deals. BUT to think that the RNC as a powerful political organization as well as ALL sitting Republicans that support trump they would then be colluding and helping Russia, by supporting Trump?
NO?
Mueller dug up an old investigation on Manafort for money laundering and tax fraud etc. He had no cause of collusion with Russia in the Trump campaign. Mueller used the old investigation that was not prosecuted years ago which then Mueller used to indict Manfort in hopes that Manafort would roll over on Trump. Mueller got nothing from Manafort on Trump. Further Manafort was never indicted for anything related to the Trump campaign.
Oh that's too easy
...
I see. Ok, thank you for spending the time to elaborate. Yes, Trump’s Russian ties go back to his first visit in Russia with his first wife, Ivana (who speaks fluent Russian, BTW). So, it should have been no secret to anyone. I think the concern came about with the possibility that Russia may have kompromat, which is a standard Russian intelligence technique of extortion. That is one of the ways they enlist agents. As evidence of Trump’s complicity, consider his opinion of Putin and taking Putin’s opinion above his own intelligence agencies. Also, consider one of the most consistent endeavors of Trump (other than the wall): consistently pushing for the lifting of sanctions against Russia.
Standard law enforcement techniques. What’s your point?
Yeah when you consider what those three woman said about Kav's sexual abuse he has to be guilty. Hang that bastard. However those three woman had not one shred of corroboration to support their claim, zip zero. But you believe then without any factual evidence. Now Kav is a SCJ.
Now here is Obama doing everything Putin wanted. Now tell me Obama never colluded with Putin.
Putin told Obamafail to stay out of Crimea and he said yes sir. Stupidity
*
Putin told Obamafail to NOT sell arms to Ukrainian and he said yes sir. Stupidity
*
Putin told Obamafail to NOT put our missile defense shield in NATO, he again says yes sir. Stupidity
*
Obamafail yells out his RED LINE to Syria to never use WMD’s on its people again, Yet Syria walked all over Obamafail’s RED LINE. Putin told Obamafail to stay out and Obamafail says Yes Sir. What a ****ing dumbass coward.
*
Obamafail asked Putin of all people to certify that all of Syria’s WMD were taking out of Syria and Putin lied to Obamafail. Stupidity
*
Obamafail told Russia that once he is reelected he can be more flexible to what Putin wants. How stupid was that. Obamafail loved Putin and did whatever Putin wanted. Watch the video. Stupidity
*
video of Obama telling russia he can be more flexable - Yahoo Video Search Results
*