• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Treasury officials say smaller tax refunds are a good thing

many people already have too many allowances on their checks
depending on the size of your family a person should only take up to 2 allowances.

this will help mitigate paying at the end of the year.

I get where you are coming from, It's simple math, to know if one contributes more they will get a higher year end return, and if they contribute less they will get a lower return.

but I'm writing about what exist beyond what the simplicity of the title of the thread is stating.
 
Last edited:
I get where you are coming from, It's simple math, to know if one contributes more they will get a higher year end return, and if they contribute less they will get a lower return.

but I'm writing about what exist beyond what the simplicity of the title of the thread is stating.

no what you are talking about is nonsense that is easily proven wrong.
 
The question isn't the size of the refund but the amount withheld throughout the tax year.

I expect the withholding was made smaller to make the tax cut appear more significant. Now with the refund being smaller I expect support for it to be smaller
 
no what you are talking about is nonsense that is easily proven wrong.

I don't mind you considering things you do not care to consider as being nonsense, if that works for you... "fine"... ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom