• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

At least 11 dead in attack at Nairobi hotel complex

If you had ever written anything as thoughtful as I do, you'd have hung it on the refrigerator for mommy to admire. I speak the truth and you find it unpalatable. I'm not surprised.

:lamo

Thoughtful. Your entire contribution to the discussion on fundamentalist terrorists killing people is “I don’t know what to do but you are a big meany and I hate you!”

****ing pathetic.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
If you think that forcing your religion upon the globe makes you bad, I agree, and you can start fighting the extremists in your own country and party. You don't have to travel outside the US to find them. Whether it's capitalism forcing its greed god upon the globe or American, Christian missionaries doing their extortion act in Asia, it's the same thing. Where you're wrong is thinking there's a difference between them.

It's not that we don't both agree that some people could die and make the world a better place, it's in the narrow focus of your disdain upon Islam. They are but one scourge upon this planet and killing them won't solve the underlying problem.

I don't recall anyone from my country starting a religious war, here in my country. Soon as someone does, I'll be the first to say they need to die. Fair enough?

Killing Nazis solved that problem. Don't say it won't work.
 
:lamo

Thoughtful. Your entire contribution to the discussion on fundamentalist terrorists killing people is “I don’t know what to do but you are a big meany and I hate you!”

****ing pathetic.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LOL. Clearly your're illiterate as my posts contained WAY more substance than what your juvenile paraphrasing suggests. If you can't even be honest about that, well...
 
They just need jobs.
 
LOL. Clearly your're illiterate as my posts contained WAY more substance than what your juvenile paraphrasing suggests. If you can't even be honest about that, well...
:lamo

Bull****. You talk more without saying anything than any 4 people on this board combined. And all you have managed to do is show you are clueless as to how to deal with terrorists but have hatred and disdain for those that do and have.
 
I don't recall anyone from my country starting a religious war, here in my country. Soon as someone does, I'll be the first to say they need to die. Fair enough?

Killing Nazis solved that problem. Don't say it won't work.

Just because our secular society functions to squash some religious zealotry does not mean it's not chomping at the bit to come out, and it does frequently. Remember the manufacturer, selling rifles to the military, who put that biblical scripture on their sites? I do and so does Islam. Or, what about the way that religiosity gets used as an excuse to trample the rights of others, whether it be abortion, putting ten commandments displays on government grounds, etc. There's plenty of warning signs that American extremists are not controlling their impulses well.

American history is also rife with religious conflict, from our earliest days. The Catholics and protestants were notoriously bad at getting along and, in many ways, still are. People lost their lives over that ****. One could also argue that the genocide of the native Americans had a religious component. We believed that if god didn't want us to massacre savages, he'd have stopped us. That same sort of "logic" still exists in religious minds and it worries me every time I see their overt acts of religious dominion.
 
Just because our secular society functions to squash some religious zealotry does not mean it's not chomping at the bit to come out, and it does frequently. Remember the manufacturer, selling rifles to the military, who put that biblical scripture on their sites? I do and so does Islam. Or, what about the way that religiosity gets used as an excuse to trample the rights of others, whether it be abortion, putting ten commandments displays on government grounds, etc. There's plenty of warning signs that American extremists are not controlling their impulses well.

American history is also rife with religious conflict, from our earliest days. The Catholics and protestants were notoriously bad at getting along and, in many ways, still are. People lost their lives over that ****. One could also argue that the genocide of the native Americans had a religious component. We believed that if god didn't want us to massacre savages, he'd have stopped us. That same sort of "logic" still exists in religious minds and it worries me every time I see their overt acts of religious dominion.

No one's rights were trampled. And definitely, no one died from it.
 
No one's rights were trampled. And definitely, no one died from it.
Its ****ing hilarious seeing people that think a bunch of Muslims living in the jungles of Kenya are perusing websites and becoming so outraged by a quote on a website that they become murderous Muslim fundamentalists. These people will swallow any leftist swill they are fed and regurgitate it dutifully.
 
Its ****ing hilarious seeing people that think a bunch of Muslims living in the jungles of Kenya are perusing websites and becoming so outraged by a quote on a website that they become murderous Muslim fundamentalists. These people will swallow any leftist swill they are fed and regurgitate it dutifully.

Useful idiots.
 
No one's rights were trampled. And definitely, no one died from it.

How can ANYONE trust the government to defend their own religious freedom when they display the icons of a specific, other, religion on public grounds and in every way pander to its adherents? Are you serious? That's the kind of obliviousness that conservatives are famous for.

And what of their use of religious judgments to force women to risk pregnancies they don't want. You think nobody has died from that? Many have. But, they were just women and risking death is just the cost of participating in the Christo-fascist dating game.

The religious trampling is the worst kind because they feel entitled to it. These nihilists owe no allegiance to reality or the tenets of base morality because the only thing that matters is magical heaven, not human blood. That their dementia is allowed to infect our rational discourse is a disgrace for which they will never take responsibility, never awake to comprehend the harm they cause. You seem willing to participate in helping them deny responsibility by pretending to see nothing. Situational blindness is a not the moral choice.
 
Useful idiots.

You and Vance should get a room. Apparently, you are able to understand what Vance is saying. I, personally, am not fluent in retard and, thus, can't figure out how you are both unaware of the myriad of perceived assaults upon Islam of which the rifle sites were but one. From Israel and Palestine to the American military in Saudi Arabia, the war has been stirred for decades. I agree that Islam is not a rational enemy, but they're not alone. They feel entitled to murder at will and that's where you and they are alike.

I laugh at you both while pitying a world that must forever be shaped by the selective obsessions and fears of violent monkeys. It doesn't make sense but that's monkey sense for you.
 
Yeah, the islamists are harder to spot, but not impossible to spot.

The trouble is defining the level of Islamism worthy of death. The vast majority of Islamists have never picked up a weapon, but they support and help finance those who do. That number is probably in the many tens, if not hundreds, of millions. In Pakistan nearly 17 million of them voted for the candidate who reaffirmed his support for the death penalty for those who insult Islam. They would be happy to see me die because I'm critical of much of the Qur'an. Are they nuke-worthy? And if so, how do you kill just them?
 
The trouble is defining the level of Islamism worthy of death. The vast majority of Islamists have never picked up a weapon, but they support and help finance those who do. That number is probably in the many tens, if not hundreds, of millions. In Pakistan nearly 17 million of them voted for the candidate who reaffirmed his support for the death penalty for those who insult Islam. They would be happy to see me die because I'm critical of much of the Qur'an. Are they nuke-worthy? And if so, how do you kill just them?

That makes them the same thing.
 
I didn't say we should.

No, but you seemed to be headed in that direction. How else are we going to "kill enough of them" if we've established that so many of them look and act like everyday Joes (well, Mohamads)?
 
No, but you seemed to be headed in that direction. How else are we going to "kill enough of them" if we've established that so many of them look and act like everyday Joes (well, Mohamads)?

Not at all. There are plenty of ways to kill them, without nukes.
 
The trouble is defining the level of Islamism worthy of death. The vast majority of Islamists have never picked up a weapon, but they support and help finance those who do. That number is probably in the many tens, if not hundreds, of millions. In Pakistan nearly 17 million of them voted for the candidate who reaffirmed his support for the death penalty for those who insult Islam. They would be happy to see me die because I'm critical of much of the Qur'an. Are they nuke-worthy? And if so, how do you kill just them?

Have you been asleep for the last 30 years or so or do you just not pay attention?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You and Vance should get a room. Apparently, you are able to understand what Vance is saying. I, personally, am not fluent in retard and, thus, can't figure out how you are both unaware of the myriad of perceived assaults upon Islam of which the rifle sites were but one. From Israel and Palestine to the American military in Saudi Arabia, the war has been stirred for decades. I agree that Islam is not a rational enemy, but they're not alone. They feel entitled to murder at will and that's where you and they are alike.

I laugh at you both while pitying a world that must forever be shaped by the selective obsessions and fears of violent monkeys. It doesn't make sense but that's monkey sense for you.
Laugh your ass silly. Then go back to the reality that you and people like you share impotent views on how to deal with murderous ****s and instead content yourself with hatred and loathing if people that do and have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top Bottom