- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
- Messages
- 26,616
- Reaction score
- 26,738
- Location
- AL
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
What makes you think I'm dreaming?
Dream: indulge in daydreams or fantasies about something greatly desired.
What makes you think I'm dreaming?
Dream: indulge in daydreams or fantasies about something greatly desired.
I knew you didn't have the balls to answer question.
What particular misconduct would that be?
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate...a-crime-if-a-president-pardoned-individual-in
William Barr, President Trump's nominee to serve as attorney general, said on Tuesday that it would be illegal for a U.S. president to pardon an individual if that person agreed not to incriminate the commander in chief in a criminal offense.
"Do you believe a president could lawfully issue a pardon in exchange for the recipient's promise not incriminate him?" Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) asked Barr during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
"No, that would be a crime," Barr said.
========================================
I'm sure this option has either crossed Trump's mind or been discussed among his legal defense team.
Maybe Barr doesn't like beer.
I answered it, full stop.
You could not answer me when I asked
Therefore, since you do not know, you are dreaming, or indulging in daydreams or fantasies about something greatly desired.
Isn't this the same Barr who doesn't know what the emoluments clause says?
Liberals shouldn't have a problem with that, since very few of them have ever read The Constitution.
It's going to be funny as hell if Barr burns some of the members of Mueller's team. :lamo
Yeah, it seems if the Conservatives have read the Constitution they don't really understand it... :roll:
Ya do remember that short-lived ignorant stunt House Republican'ts tried to pull requiring all new bills ti cite the Constitutional basis for allowing such a new law...
Wanna say it was 2010 or so, the Republican'ts grandstanding with Obama in office. Apparently wrapping oneself up in the Constitution while making speeches doesn't educate you on the contents... eace
Keep up the dreams brother!
Liberals are clueless when it comes to The Constitution.
Nah, not that, even before all that. Barr is much more to the point, not evasive and seems a lot more competent.Barr hasn't been falsely accused of sexual assault...yet.
Liberals shouldn't have a problem with that, since very few of them have ever read The Constitution.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate...a-crime-if-a-president-pardoned-individual-in
William Barr, President Trump's nominee to serve as attorney general, said on Tuesday that it would be illegal for a U.S. president to pardon an individual if that person agreed not to incriminate the commander in chief in a criminal offense.
"Do you believe a president could lawfully issue a pardon in exchange for the recipient's promise not incriminate him?" Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) asked Barr during his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
"No, that would be a crime," Barr said.
========================================
I'm sure this option has either crossed Trump's mind or been discussed among his legal defense team.
:thumbs:Maybe Barr doesn't like beer.
Ok but...Barr suggests Mueller’s long-awaited report might not be made public.
I ask you why am I not surprised ?
I think this in the right's (GOP) DNA...cover-up ? There is no other reason to keep Mueller's report classified.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ef28312c8b9_story.html?utm_term=.5b11eb6b230d
I liked that he said that, but he did say some other things which I thought were red flags, such as "I'll send you my summary of the Mueller report", yeah, right.
But.. this
https://www.thecut.com/2019/01/william-barr-trump-attorney-general-nominee.html
Chilling stuff, this guy's a hard right winger, on that point there is no question.
On the issue of the shutdown, Trump/repubs vs Dems, he said "it takes two to tango", implying responsibility is on both sides of the shutdown.
I realize a lot of righties would love everyone to believe that, that would be like saying a rapist, forcing a woman to have sex, and thus exclaiming "it takes two to tango". In other words, taking people hostage to get your way in congress to compensate for your inability to make a deal is a one way street, there no "two" in this tango.
Lol...you guys really do think that in or out of power that things need to have your approval don't you?....StunningI liked that he said that, but he did say some other things which I thought were red flags, such as "I'll send you my summary of the Mueller report", yeah, right.
But.. this
https://www.thecut.com/2019/01/william-barr-trump-attorney-general-nominee.html
Chilling stuff, this guy's a hard right winger, on that point there is no question.
On the issue of the shutdown, Trump/repubs vs Dems, he said "it takes two to tango", implying responsibility is on both sides of the shutdown.
I realize a lot of righties would love everyone to believe that, that would be like saying a rapist, forcing a woman to have sex, and thus exclaiming "it takes two to tango". In other words, taking people hostage to get your way in congress to compensate for your inability to make a deal is a one way street, there no "two" in this tango.