• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Networks to air Pelosi, Schumer rebuttal to Trump

ReverendHellh0und said:
YOur claim:







So you are saying telling the truth about crimes committed by illegal aliens ="declaring brown people were coming to kill us and chop our heads off."



I don't think you read that correctly or are engaging in dishonest exaggerations and hysterics here.
Click to expand...

He used anecdotes to push a narrative that if one extrapolates from it, then immigrants are coming here to kill us. It is deceit. And one you seem to be willing to help with I suppose.
 
jmotivator said:
I get how this works. You did something stupid and are now embarrassing yourself with an "I meant to do that" excuse.
Click to expand...

Come on, dude. At least try to be clever in your projection.
 
Phys251 said:
Come on, dude. At least try to be clever in your projection.
Click to expand...

Heh, you are now testing the boundaries of the irony meter.
 
Anthony60 said:
Any fool knows that the democrats see this as a source of votes, they'd be in favor of a wall with machine gun turrets if they thought republicans would get more of the Latino votes coming into this country.
Click to expand...

Which is pure speculation and conjecture with not one document provided to prove your baseless and inane demagoguery.
 
jmotivator said:
Heh, you are now testing the boundaries of the irony meter.
Click to expand...

Like I said. Zero originality to your projection. Can't you at least try to be clever?
 
Phys251 said:
Like I said. Zero originality to your projection. Can't you at least try to be clever?
Click to expand...

Hmmm.. and restating a claim of my lack of originality. You are on a role.
 
Obscurity said:
Which is pure speculation and conjecture with not one document provided to prove your baseless and inane demagoguery.
Click to expand...
Uhhh... it's a debate board, and that's my opinion. Like I need some kind of documentation, LOL!
 
When I saw the rebuttal on TV I thought for sure it was an SNL skit at first.
 
poweRob said:
He used anecdotes to push a narrative that if one extrapolates from it, then immigrants are coming here to kill us. It is deceit. And one you seem to be willing to help with I suppose.
Click to expand...




So he did what all politicians do, but what he said was not a lie.
 
Anthony60 said:
Uhhh... it's a debate board, and that's my opinion. Like I need some kind of documentation, LOL!
Click to expand...

You said it wasn't your opinion. And correct, it's a debate board, not an argument forum. In debates you have to cite evidence that supports your claim. In this case you're taking it on faith, which I reject. It's unreasonable nonsense and is a bald faced assertion with no evidence to support it, at all.
 
Obscurity said:
You said it wasn't your opinion. And correct, it's a debate board, not an argument forum. In debates you have to cite evidence that supports your claim. In this case you're taking it on faith, which I reject. It's unreasonable nonsense and is a bald faced assertion with no evidence to support it, at all.
Click to expand...

I just told you it's my opinion. Which is ridiculous, you'd have to be pretty thick to not be able to figure that out on your own.

Of course, you'll settle for nothing less than a signed note from Chuckie Schumer stating that verbatim.
I know the lib tactics backward and forward. You make up a false condition, and then require impossible proof. Then, run away. So easy to read.
 
Anthony60 said:
I just told you it's my opinion. Which is ridiculous, you'd have to be pretty thick to not be able to figure that out on your own.

Of course, you'll settle for nothing less than a signed note from Chuckie Schumer stating that verbatim.
I know the lib tactics backward and forward. You make up a false condition, and then require impossible proof. Then, run away. So easy to read.
Click to expand...

False condition? You mean, you have a false opinion based on absolutely no evidence at all beyond right wing soundbytes. Right wing soundbytes aren't evidence.

I am asking you to provide some form of proof beyond Hannity said it!. I knew it was your uninformed, unsupported opinion all along.

That's your issue to work out. Not mine. I don't accept things on blind faith because I am not a braindead idiot.
 
Obscurity said:
False condition? You mean, you have a false opinion based on absolutely no evidence at all beyond right wing soundbytes. Right wing soundbytes aren't evidence.

I am asking you to provide some form of proof beyond Hannity said it!. I knew it was your uninformed, unsupported opinion all along.

That's your issue to work out. Not mine. I don't accept things on blind faith because I am not a braindead idiot.
Click to expand...

Who's Hannity? Blind faith? Your entire party is based on blind faith.
 
Phys251 said:
So his flip-flopping on who would pay for the wall doesn't matter?
Click to expand...

Hicup was crystal clear....What didn't you understand about his statement...We have been for months trying to tell you people that republican's who elected Trump either knew that this whole meme about who was going to pay for the "wall" (barrier) was rhetoric. We knew that appropriations would have to come from the Congress. Now, it is a fair argument that our opposition has that the republican majority didn't get this done in two years, and as a result, in part, that is why the house flipped to democrats, however un impressive their victory was.

The bottom line here is that there is a multitude of evidence that the barrier where in place works...BP tells us it works, and they want more of it....The $5.7 billion asked for by the President, is a pittance when compared to expenditures in the past for border security, you know, when all the democrats sounded just like Trump on this issue...So, one might ask what's behind this shift in democrat position? is it Trump? Because if so, they should be punished by the voter for that kind of childish BS.
 
Anthony60 said:
Who's Hannity? Blind faith? Your entire party is based on blind faith.
Click to expand...

I don't have a party, I'm a registered independent. You literally just admitted you have blind faith. You accept the idea there is an overarching conspiracy among democrats to flood the country with illegals, and yet, there is no factual evidence of that being true.
 
j-mac said:
Hicup was crystal clear....What didn't you understand about his statement...We have been for months trying to tell you people
Click to expand...

You think you have any kind of standing whatsoever to explain away your president's repeated lies over who would pay for the wall? :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom