• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Elizabeth Warren launches exploratory committee ahead of likely 2020 presidential run

I don't need to back up my claims. Trump is -on record lying repeatedly.-

You guys won't admit it.

That's your ****ing problem, not mine. And I'm not here to salve your butthurt over the media pointing out his repeated lies.

Bunch of clowns got fooled by this new yorker. Can't admit it. It's sad.

You still here?
 
She won't be the last to announce...The Goal to remove trump...Watch and See

To bad Ocasio Cortez can't run. Pretty face, says stupid things that the left likes, has no idea what she is doing. Like a female Obama.
 
Not sure why you're bringing up religion. As someone who disavows and spurns the corpse god embraced in the christian bible, I have little interest in debating the minutiae of political religious zeal in america.

Do you deny our POTUS is a pathological liar? On what basis? That some liberal thinks he lied? Pathetic and paltry argument you're making.

Trump has spouted so many lies and mistruths it's astounding, least of which is "repeal and replace, day one, I promise you" or the now completely defunct "Mexico will pay for the wall."

We all know those are lies. You are simply ignoring the reality because your impotent, rage fuelled, overweight billionaire opportunist got elected.

Trump has no doubt told some lies but not nearly as many as his lying accusers do. Those hypocrites should be ashamed of themselves for overlooking massive lying of democrats while going overboard to accuse Trump of lying even when he is not.
 
No doubt deduction has its uses in some things. That is not the issue.What is the issue is you making a claim of fact about the motivations of Obama voters and you have nothing to support it. Deduction does NOT supply that evidence. The only thing that would is a study of the motivations of voters and you can only that through interviews with voters.

Your deductions are worthless in this specific area .
I use deduction which you don't support as fact. Golly, how will you know if the sun revolves around the earth or vice-versa? How will you know if the earth rotates from east to west or vice-versa? You haven't seen either take place so you can't know, no? BTW, that's called concrete thinking.
 
The new lying woman goddess the democrats worship claims her DNA test has proven she did not lie about being an American Indian, in spite of the fact that the tests prove she has not much more American Indian blood than about 90% of all Americans who have any blood at all.
So if she didn't lie as concrete thinking people claim, she was deceitful. She was a cultural appropriator.
 
Probably they are. We know Obama was. And HRC. Why is Trump given this gift of flexibility by you? He lied. Deal with it. He constantly lies. He is promulgating lies as we speak. He makes claims of absolute nonsense and his supporters parrot it all over.

He lies but you try to prove he's promulgating lies as we speak. This is where you go off the rails into rhetoric.
 
Yadda yadda yadda. The DNA test proves she has Native American blood.

Can you say the same for your moronic commander in chief?

Why do you give Pocahontas a pass but not the orange clown? And Pocahontas is a cultural appropriator.

BTW, tell me why it's so important to determine your heritage?
 
I use deduction which you don't support as fact. Golly, how will you know if the sun revolves around the earth or vice-versa? How will you know if the earth rotates from east to west or vice-versa? You haven't seen either take place so you can't know, no? BTW, that's called concrete thinking.

How does your deductions based on your own personal prejudices about race explain the motivations of other people that you have never surveyed or interviewed?

This is NOT making a reasonable deduction about an objects actions but is an attempt to offer a very real personal explanation to the inner motivations of other people that you have no way of knowing without interviewing them.
 
It may not be. But her republican opponent sure thought it was.

Her republican opponent was mystified that Warren brought up such an insignificant fact in the first place.
 
If you can find past behavior of mine to support that I welcome you to post it here.

Let's start with your behavior towards Kanye (who probably isn't even GOP).
 
How does your deductions based on your own personal prejudices about race explain the motivations of other people that you have never surveyed or interviewed?

This is NOT making a reasonable deduction about an objects actions but is an attempt to offer a very real personal explanation to the inner motivations of other people that you have no way of knowing without interviewing them.

Explain how my deductions are based on my own personal prejudices.
 
Explain how my deductions are based on my own personal prejudices.

You are attempting to mind read people based on their race and you conclude that it was race that motivated their vote when you have no information other than your own prejudices about rte to base that on. It is as obvious as the nose on your face.
 
You are attempting to mind read people based on their race and you conclude that it was race that motivated their vote when you have no information other than your own prejudices about rte to base that on. It is as obvious as the nose on your face.

You're attempting to read my mind which you claim is attempting to read other people's minds. Wow, you must be Karnak.

EDIT: I take that back, you're no Karnak.
 
Her republican opponent was mystified that Warren brought up such an insignificant fact in the first place.

More mystifying is why you believe she brought it up when it was her republican opponent did. If not for him nobody, including Warren herself, would be talking about this.

How did this become a political issue?

It began during Warren's 2012 Senate run, when her opponent, Brown, accused her of lying to get a leg up in her academic career.
"Professor Warren claimed that she was a Native American, a person of color," he said during a debate. "And as you can see, she's not."

https://www-m.cnn.com/2016/06/29/po...cahontas/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/
 
You're attempting to read my mind which you claim is attempting to read other people's minds. Wow, you must be Karnak.

EDIT: I take that back, you're no Karnak.

One does not need to be the reincarnation of Johnny Carson to see the racist personal conclusions you made in your own posts.
 
One does not need to be the reincarnation of Johnny Carson to see the racist personal conclusions you made in your own posts.

What's for sure and not your rhetoric is some who voted for Obama had racist intentions.
 
She's a liar and a communist. She wants to be a dictator. There's no telling what she has hiding in the closet.

This post sounds like paranoid conspiracy. You don't know what communism is.
 
The whole Bernie vs Hillary thing definitely shook things up. Although Bernie was her preferred candidate she wanted to ensure that it would be someone who would beat Trump. Obviously we all know how well the worked out in hindsight but I will give you that she is not clairvoyant.

Canada, it's way better than America, it's what happens when people don't vote against their own interests to stick it to the minorities and liberals.
 
If you think you aren't racist, do whatever you need to make you feel better.

Racism isn't even a real thing... :roll:
 
Canada, it's way better than America, it's what happens when people don't vote against their own interests to stick it to the minorities and liberals.

We like our Little Canadian side-kicks... they are cute enough and just so darn polite that we feel honor bound to protect them so they can frolick about.
 
We like our Little Canadian side-kicks... they are cute enough and just so darn polite that we feel honor bound to protect them so they can frolick about.

And all of us Canadians are eternally grateful to the United States of America for sending its troops to defend freedom from the German attacks in 1914, 1915, 1916, (most of) 1917, 1939, 1940, and (most of) 1941 while Canada didn't do anything except make money off of WWI and WWII.
 
Back
Top Bottom