- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 36,634
- Reaction score
- 35,660
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
First, I also mentioned in my link that prosecutors are mentioning Trump as a co-conspirator and so is Michael Cohen. You chose to ignore that.A USA Today article is not evidence. Evidence?
Second, I don't have access to the actual indictment, without redactments -- but I find your argument that unless I can show what prosecutors have, there is no evidence. That's an absurd defense -- if a poster can't produce the evidence that the prosecutors are preparing, there isn't anything there.
However, what's making it to the public is clear (except for those invested in not seeing) that there is plenty of evidence.
I read your posts and see someone who is swimming against the river flow of very serious criminality against the Trumps.
Last edited: