Please show us one stinking reason why there is an investigation going on for 2 years at all. And not just any reason will do, because it better apply to just Trump. It can't be a generic reason that any President could be investigated for. I don't see a SC investigating the activities of the prior administration.
One? I'll give you many.
It is astounding that you still cling to the 'there is no evidence' narrative amidst the already existing and growing amounts of extremely strong evidence to the contrary. Trump's own lawyer contradicted Trump's claim that he had no knowledge of the Trump Tower meeting with a Russian operative. In fact, Trump himself -- who originally said "nobody met with Russians" -- which then turned into "yes, they met with Russians but only about adoption -- and I wrote the letter myself" which then turned into "
they met with Russians about *opposition research* which everybody does" and then, "collusion isn't a crime." No, that is admitting that his son conspired with a foreign government to illegally affect an election and he knew about it -- which means he lied about it previously too.
Then there are these suspicious events: What American President has sought to establish back channels to the Russians that only use the Russians' own secure communications, and cannot be heard by American intelligence? What American president has a secret two-hour meeting with the dictator of Russia and won't disclose what was discussed? What presidential candidate offers Putin a $50 million apartment if he approves a building project in moscow?
What American President asserts that he has the absolute right to pardon himself while also asserting that the did nothing wrong?
If your standards are: "collusion hasn't yet been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt in a courtroom," you can't also be saying "Mueller needs to hurry up and shut down his investigation." If you actually care about the country, you wouldn't say "the president can't be charged with obstruction of justice by definition," you would ask: "What did the President and his family actually DO?"
If your standards are: "We care about our country and its independence from *any* foreign power," you ought to be profoundly concerned and want the most comprehensive investigation possible.
When I watch Rudy Giuliani or Sean Hannity, I see people who are strategizing to help Trump evade law enforcement, no less than Al Capone's lawyers did. Not people who give a damn about their country anymore.
Then, we have additional evidence that the Trump campaign took Russian money for the inaugural committee -- and hid that fact, which is a crime of its own.
I don't see a SC investigating the activities of the prior administration.
I guess you were asleep during Bill Clinton's presidency.
If you are suggesting that a special prosecutor should investigate Hillary Clinton or Obama, they don't need special prosecutors, since they aren't part of the government. The current Justice Department could do that. Since they haven't, it's because there isn't anything to prosecute.
