• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Roger Stone Taking the Fifth

WTF? You need to go back and reread what I wrote about him before you try to insult. I said NOTHING about him being any part of the government. Another fail by you. Another one of your many.
It was a misunderstanding not an insult. Nice dodge on why you dragged your brother into the conversation in the first place if he has nothing to do with the government. Was that just a simplistic bully tactic? "Me and my brother think you're a POS!"? If not, then please explain why you brought your brother into the discussion on Congressional powers, oversight and your conspiracy theory that Congress has no power over the DOJ, the FBI and Mueller.

He wouldn't and there is plenty of Congressional oversight who have seen the unredacted documents. If there weren't, then why aren't the Republicans making a fuss? They aren't because they know everything is on the level.
A surprisingly few have seen the the classified information and that is exactly why they want it unredacted so ALL of Congress can see and the public can see what the DOJ and the FBI has been up to. I don’t think many far left dems will be interested but some independents a republicans like my older brother sure might.
 
LOL. FOX NEWS...try to find a non-biased source Buzz and get back with me. :)

Like what? CNN? MSNBC?

You have your "proof".
Accept it or don't. But remember...your whining means nothing now.

Bye
 
Sorry, but that's incorrect. Mueller has Congressional oversight and Congressional funding. Why do you think Trump threatened to defund him earlier this year? Additionally, Mueller works through a chain of command where his funding could be cut anywhere along the line.

Who do you think can give him a "gawd-damn spanking" if is he really has "outrageous power to do whatever he likes"? The fact remains everyone works for someone in our government up until it gets to "We, the People".

The irony of all of this is that the Republicans are whining just like the Democrats did during Starr's investigation using the same exact arguments. They are all hypocrites.

Mueller has and is abusing the power of his investigation and position.
He needs to be summarily fired.
 
Like what? CNN? MSNBC?

You have your "proof".
Accept it or don't. But remember...your whining means nothing now.

Bye

Obviously MSNBC is as biased as Fox and CNN leans Left, just not as far left as MSNBC or as far off center as Fox....which is why I'm curious why Trump has such a problem with CNN but not MSNBC. Does he own stock in MSNBC? Did he has an affair with one of their members or major stockshare holders? It's a curiosity.

OTOH, these news sources are the least biased: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/center/
 
Mueller has and is abusing the power of his investigation and position.
He needs to be summarily fired.

We have a Republican President, a Republican Senate and a Republican House. Why haven't they reined Mueller in or even fired him?
 
Mueller has and is abusing the power of his investigation and position.
He needs to be summarily fired.

Well, we know Trump wants Mueller fired BADLY!. Why do you think Trump hasn't fired Mueller ?.....this should be interesting watching you grasp at straws and tap dance on this one. Whatcha got Trumpette? :lamo
 
Obviously MSNBC is as biased as Fox and CNN leans Left, just not as far left as MSNBC or as far off center as Fox....which is why I'm curious why Trump has such a problem with CNN but not MSNBC. Does he own stock in MSNBC? Did he has an affair with one of their members or major stockshare holders? It's a curiosity.

OTOH, these news sources are the least biased: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/center/

ALL news sources are biased. FOX presents a view from the right, and CNN calls all white people racist and terrorists.
Which is why CNN's viewership is below the cooking channel.
I would say that Trump has the same issue with CNN as I do. They are annoying.
 
Mueller has and is abusing the power of his investigation and position.
He needs to be summarily fired.

No he’s not, and no he doesn’t.

You seem awfully afraid of what he’s got on Trump.
 
Like what? CNN? MSNBC?

You have your "proof".
Accept it or don't. But remember...your whining means nothing now.

Bye

Lol are you seriously accusing others of “whining” in this thread?
 
We have a Republican President, a Republican Senate and a Republican House. Why haven't they reined Mueller in or even fired him?

What do you think is going on here?
Do you not remember who initiated the original slander campaign against Trump?
They ALL have allot to lose.
 
ALL news sources are biased. FOX presents a view from the right, and CNN calls all white people racist and terrorists.
Which is why CNN's viewership is below the cooking channel.
I would say that Trump has the same issue with CNN as I do. They are annoying.

Seriously dude? I've never heard that, but do admire your loyalty to Murdoch's Fox New channel. However, I'll stick with the Media Bias Factcheck for a list of reliable, centered sources.
 
Yeah, trumpet noises is what I expected. Tell everyone how Alan Deshowitz bitching about something is documentation of a perjury trap again.

Lol @ your non-existent legalese.

Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
 
Well, we know Trump wants Mueller fired BADLY!. Why do you think Trump hasn't fired Mueller ?.....this should be interesting watching you grasp at straws and tap dance on this one. Whatcha got Trumpette? :lamo

Trumpette?
Gee...you're a funny guy. You spend all your time grasping at the straw of "collusion" and tap dance around Mueller's abuses, and then accuse those not buying this charade of the same. That's thin and juvenile.
You've heard sacred cows of both sides of the isle warn against firing Mueller. Do you really think they do this because Mueller is such a great and honest American? Or perhaps they do this because they all know that he'll willingly cover up for them, just as he's done with the despicable crap he's done surrounding the 9/11 affairs.
Ya...Bob Mueller. The great American hero who kept the families of 9/11 victims from suing the Saudis.
Everyone salute Bob Mueller. The prick who shat upon the families if the 9/11 victims. (Buzz spits)

THAT'S what I got...Eagle-Boy. You got any more great patriotic horse kaka to shovel?
 
What do you think is going on here?
Do you not remember who initiated the original slander campaign against Trump?
They ALL have allot to lose.

Nice dodge, but that doesn't explain why Trump, the Republican Senate nor the Republican House have done anything about the allegations you've made. Occam's Razor says the reason is because it's a big Nothing Burger.

2of6pr.jpg
 
No he’s not, and no he doesn’t.

You seem awfully afraid of what he’s got on Trump.

Boy you have some very interesting nuggets of wisdom to share, don't ya... :roll:

 
Trumpette?
Gee...you're a funny guy. You spend all your time grasping at the straw of "collusion" and tap dance around Mueller's abuses, and then accuse those not buying this charade of the same. That's thin and juvenile.
You've heard sacred cows of both sides of the isle warn against firing Mueller. Do you really think they do this because Mueller is such a great and honest American? Or perhaps they do this because they all know that he'll willingly cover up for them, just as he's done with the despicable crap he's done surrounding the 9/11 affairs.
Ya...Bob Mueller. The great American hero who kept the families of 9/11 victims from suing the Saudis.
Everyone salute Bob Mueller. The prick who shat upon the families if the 9/11 victims. (Buzz spits)

THAT'S what I got...Eagle-Boy. You got any more great patriotic horse kaka to shovel?

Yep...prove Mueller has abused anything..other than you ego
 
Seriously dude? I've never heard that, but do admire your loyalty to Murdoch's Fox New channel. However, I'll stick with the Media Bias Factcheck for a list of reliable, centered sources.


Enjoy...
 
Yeah, trumpet noises is what I expected. Tell everyone how Alan Deshowitz bitching about something is documentation of a perjury trap again.

Lol @ your non-existent legalese.

Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.

As opposed to you, right?
Pfft...:roll:
 
Yep...prove Mueller has abused anything..other than you ego


Wrongfully Convicted Men Awarded $101M


"A federal judge Thursday ordered the government to pay more than $101 million in the case of four men who spent decades in prison for a 1965 murder they did not commit after the FBI withheld evidence of their innocence.

The judge called the government's defense that the FBI had no duty to get involved because it was a state case "absurd."

Peter Limone, Joseph Salvati and the families of the two other men who died in prison had sued the federal government for malicious prosecution.

They argued Boston FBI agents knew mob hitman Joseph "The Animal" Barboza lied when he named them as killers in the 1965 death of Edward Deegan. They said Barboza was protecting a fellow FBI informant, Vincent "Jimmy" Flemmi, who was involved.

The government argued that federal authorities had no duty to share information with state officials who prosecuted Limone, Salvati, Henry Tameleo and Louis Greco. Federal authorities cannot be held responsible for the results of a state prosecution, a Justice Department lawyer argued."


Did Robert Mueller conspire to keep four innocent men framed by the FBI in prison for life for a murder they did not commit? The Boston Globe and a longtime member of the MA Parole Board say YES.[/QUOTE]


https://www.debatepolitics.com/general-political-discussion/338845-mueller-probe-has-cost-0-a-2.html#post1069353221

Mueller has a long history of faking or omitting info to get convictions. At least a judge saw it that way.

Justices Unanimously Overturn Conviction of Arthur Andersen

Members of muellers recruited team are cut from the same cloth.

"But the decision represents little more than a Pyrrhic victory for Andersen, which lost its clients after being indicted on obstruction of justice charges and has no chance of returning as a viable enterprise. The accounting firm has shrunk from 28,000 employees in the United States to a skeleton crew of 200, who are attending to the final details of closing down the partnership."

The damage is done and lives are irrevocably changed for the worse regardless.
 
Last edited:
Judicial Watch is a glorified blog run by conservatives. They aren't proof of Mueller's misconduct. Find us the government documentation - why don't ya?

Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.

Oh you don't like the message, so you shoot the messenger.

Maybe you should wonder down to the playground and pick on kindergarden white kids.
CNN will defend your right to do that...your SJW pals will glorify your bravery...and you'll feel better about yourself.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmGi78FR-H0
Enjoy...
Ahh, so because some talking head who comes on after most people go to bed makes a stupid remark and you extrapolate that to all of CNN? Do you think that equally applies to Fox if one of their talking heads says something stupid?
 
Back
Top Bottom