• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump can’t end DACA, appeals court panel says, setting up Supreme Court fight

JANFU

JANFU

Land by the Gulf Stream
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Dec 27, 2014
Messages
59,290
Reaction score
38,848
Location
Best Coast Canada
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...-top-table-main_daca-305pm:homepage/story-ans

“To be clear: we do not hold that DACA could not be rescinded as an exercise of executive branch discretion,” wrote Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw. “We hold only that here, where the executive did not make a discretionary choice to end DACA—but rather acted based on an erroneous view of what the law required—the rescission was arbitrary and capricious under settled law.”

“The government may not simultaneously both assert that its actions are legally compelled, based on its interpretation of the law, and avoid review of that assertion by the judicial branch, whose ‘province and duty’ it is ‘to say what the law is,’” Wardlaw wrote, borrowing the language of the landmark Marbury v. Madison decision.
Click to expand...
Off to SCOTUS- Wonder when they will hear the case?
 
DACA was created as an exercise of executive branch discretion and now decided that some how the executive missed applied the law.
This is a slam dunk for the Supreme court. The lower court will be over ruled.
 
Common Sense 1 said:
DACA was created as an exercise of executive branch discretion and now decided that some how the executive missed applied the law.
This is a slam dunk for the Supreme court. The lower court will be over ruled.
Click to expand...

It's more complicated than "executive action made it so executive action can do anything to it for any reason."
 
Deuce said:
It's more complicated than "executive action made it so executive action can do anything to it for any reason."
Click to expand...
This is from the same crowd that blames no president rescinding EO11246 on Jews, women, and blacks running the country.

They really don't get that the president's office doesn't get to create an EO and then decide that it's irrelevant a week later.



Sent from Trump Plaza's basement using Putin's MacBook.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom