• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

In Iran, Louis Farrakhan leads chants of "Death to America/Death to Israel"

cabse5 said:
You've just posted you have no knowledge if Louis has given aid and comfort to the enemy, Iran. Do you think Louis may have some proclivity to give aid and comfort with his hate speech?

EDIT: Because of Louis' hate speech, investigate Louis' activities while in Iran and if it is found Louis gives aid and comfort, charge him with treason.
Shall there be a special counsel called in the matter?
Click to expand...

Words are not Aid and Comfort.

As far as charging him with treason, the US is not in a declared war of open hostilities with Iran, so a charge of treason would not be possible under the Constitution's requirements.

Think about it, if it wasn't possible for Hanoi Jane to be charged, or Sean Penn, then there's nothing we can do about this ass clown either because his speech is protected by the First Amendment, as it should be.
 
cabse5 said:
You've just posted you have no knowledge if Louis has given aid and comfort to the enemy, Iran. Do you think Louis may have some proclivity to give aid and comfort with his hate speech?

EDIT: Because of Louis' hate speech, investigate Louis' activities while in Iran and if it is found Louis gives aid and comfort, charge him with treason.
Shall there be a special counsel called in the matter?
Click to expand...

In the next thread: "WHAT ABOUT THE FREE SPEECH OF NAZIS!??"
 
Beaudreaux said:
Words are not Aid and Comfort.

As far as charging him with treason, the US is not in a declared war of open hostilities with Iran, so a charge of treason would not be possible under the Constitution's requirements.

Think about it, if it wasn't possible for Hanoi Jane to be charged, or Sean Penn, then there's nothing we can do about this ass clown either because his speech is protected by the First Amendment, as it should be.
Click to expand...

How do you know words are all the Louis provided Iran? Isn't there enough to begin a special counsel investigation of the matter? You know, really get to the truth of the matter? Huh?
 
Deuce said:
In the next thread: "WHAT ABOUT THE FREE SPEECH OF NAZIS!??"
Click to expand...

Don't know what you're getting at. Are you accusing Farrakhan of being a neo-Nazi?
 
cabse5 said:
How do you know words are all the Louis provided Iran? Isn't there enough to begin a special counsel investigation of the matter? You know, really get to the truth of the matter? Huh?
Click to expand...

It would surprise to find out that the FBI wasn't watching his every move, on a daily basis.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom