• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

In Iran, Louis Farrakhan leads chants of "Death to America/Death to Israel"

mike2810 said:
I agree.

imo, it is protected speech if done on American soil.
Not sure how the courts would hold it when an American chants "death to America" in a country known to be an enemy (Iran).
Click to expand...

Obama did drone strike an American citizen, so not sure how our rights work overseas.
 
mike2810 said:
Yes, Farrakhan is a non story. No wonder we have political divide. You seem to be upset over a comment regarding "depending on your point of view".
Blue State of America.

Move on.
Click to expand...

You'll be whining crying Voter Fraud come Weds...Move on
 
Saladin4 said:
You'll be whining crying Voter Fraud come Weds...Move on
Click to expand...

Yes, please move on.

Why should I cry. I voted for who I thought would do the best job. (voted for a Democrat for some positions and a Republican for others. Personally, I am old enough not to get upset over elections. I have survived more elections than I can remember.
Are you still crying that Hilary lost.






(by the way I didn't vote for Trump during the Presidential election).
 
I just ignore him, which is easy because I keep forgetting he is still alive.
 
Chomsky said:
He may be a disgrace, I believe he is. But he is an American citizen, and is thus a free man afforded the protection of the 1st Amendment.
Click to expand...

i think sedition laws apply here.
also he is not in the US those laws don't apply.

he is on shaky ground and could be arrested if coming back to the US.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385

yea he could be in a lot of trouble.
 
And Obama was photographed with him...what's up with that??
 
I'm glad Farrakhan speaks out. I like it when an enemy is up front about how they really feel. I wish more politicians were that way, instead of mealy-mouth prevaricators. At least he says what he means and means what he says. Unlike some of his more well known followers.........
 
Obama hangs with Bill Ayres and Farrakhan really says something IMHO
 
mike2810 said:
Yes, please move on.

Why should I cry. I voted for who I thought would do the best job. (voted for a Democrat for some positions and a Republican for others. Personally, I am old enough not to get upset over elections. I have survived more elections than I can remember.
Are you still crying that Hilary lost.






(by the way I didn't vote for Trump during the Presidential election).
Click to expand...

What is it with the Rights fascination with the word butthurt? I believe most folks who were upset by the 2016 election results have moved on and are focusing on TODAY'S elections. For an adult to use the word seems rather infantile.
 
Last edited:
Tom Horn said:
What are they gonna do if we did? Wage a Jihad against us?
Click to expand...

Who is "they" and who is "us?"

- Neither the Sunni nor the Shia ulema really recognize the Nation of Islam as legitimate.

- The AMI actually issued a fatwa against the Nation of Islam for its perversion of Islam, declaring them not Muslims.

- And the entire point of the Nation of Islam is to center on race, not God.


*** That being stated, do you want to really know why so many Americans are ignorant of these matters? Why Fox news viewers have been proven to be less informed than everybody else? It's right here in this article. It's lead question, "Why won't more Dems denounce Louis Farrakhan's hate speech?" is concluded with an irrational degeneration of Obama and Democrats. It's commentary passed off as a news article. A FOX News personality on television will deliver this article with eye rolls and plenty of seething political remarks on Democrats, which will have nothing to do with the issue. In other words, this FOX News article cared more about exploiting an angle to denigrate Democrats than Farrakhan...and that is what a "very conservative" actually only cares about.

But all the rest of the world is supposed to be "fake news?" What a crock.
 
Last edited:
MSgt said:
Who is "they" and who is "us?"

- Neither the Sunni nor the Shia ulema really recognize the Nation of Islam as legitimate.

- The AMI actually issued a fatwa against the Nation of Islam for its perversion of Islam, declaring them not Muslims.

- And the entire point of the Nation of Islam is to center on race, not God.


*** That being stated, do you want to really know why so many Americans are ignorant of these matters? Why Fox news viewers have been proven to be less informed than everybody else? It's right here in this article. It's lead question, "Why won't more Dems denounce Louis Farrakhan's hate speech?" is concluded with an irrational degeneration of Obama and Democrats. It's commentary passed off as a news article. A FOX News personality on television will deliver this article with eye rolls and plenty of seething political remarks on Democrats, which will have nothing to do with the issue. In other words, this FOX News article cared more about exploiting an angle to denigrate Democrats than Farrakhan...and that is what a "very conservative" actually only cares about.

But all the rest of the world is supposed to be "fake news?" What a crock.
Click to expand...

You had me till you said , “ Fox News viewers” . I stopped reading then. Why would you assume I watch Fox News? Why would you assume I watch any news? I’ve been shown right from wrong. That’s done when you’re 6. Do you enjoy being lead around by a ring in your nose? Stop being a sheep. Get a pair. Be yourself. The only way to be a responsible person is to determine your own destiny.
 
Tom Horn said:
You had me till you said , “ Fox News viewers” . I stopped reading then. Why would you assume I watch Fox News? Why would you assume I watch any news? I’ve been shown right from wrong. That’s done when you’re 6. Do you enjoy being lead around by a ring in your nose? Stop being a sheep. Get a pair. Be yourself. The only way to be a responsible person is to determine your own destiny.
Click to expand...

The article of the thread is FOX News sourced and what I stated about it is correct. Is the article about Farrakhan...or is it about why you should hate Democrats?

It is most definitely trying to lead its readers by the nose. And again, this is why FOX News viewers are of the least informed.
 
MSgt said:
The article of the thread is FOX News sourced and what I stated about it is correct. Is the article about Farrakhan...or is it about why you should hate Democrats?

It is most definitely trying to lead its readers by the nose. And again, this is why FOX News viewers are of the least informed.
Click to expand...
ita Louis Farrakhan god dam it. Iran allowed him to come on over. See if I give a **** if a plane filled with the likes of that dies with him.
 
Tom Horn said:
ita Louis Farrakhan god dam it. Iran allowed him to come on over. See if I give a **** if a plane filled with the likes of that dies with him.
Click to expand...

Are you sure? Because it seems clear enough that this was about Obama, Bill Clinton, and generally why conservatives should simply hate Democrats.

And it's funny how you chastise Iran for "allowing him to come on over" for a visit, when the man actually lives and functions in America. Do you see how whatever it is you people feel about these sort of issues don't really come with a dose of rationality?
 
Last edited:
Roadvirus said:
First it was comparing Jews to termites, now this:



He shouldn't be allowed back into the US.
Click to expand...
1. As an American, you have every right to speech that is unpopular without it effecting your right to reenter your own country. I will codify that with, “at least for now.” If the fascists further take over, who knows.

2. Why should anyone care what Farrakhan says? He’s not a political leader and has little influence.

3. This thread is merely another dog whistle, in a campaign of dog whistles.
 
MSgt said:
Are you sure? Because it seems clear enough that this was about Obama, Bill Clinton, and generally why conservatives should simply hate Democrats.

And it's funny how you chastise Iran for "allowing him to come on over" for a visit, when the man actually lives and functions in America. Do you see how whatever it is you people feel about these sort of issues don't really come with a dose of rationality?
Click to expand...
You haven’t a clue what I’d do to 1/4 of this population if I was president.
 
MSgt said:
With or without the Swastika diaper?
Click to expand...
Why would I wish to kill social democrats? That’s for you national socialists to handle.
 
Chomsky said:
He may be a disgrace, I believe he is. But he is an American citizen, and is thus a free man afforded the protection of the 1st Amendment.
Click to expand...

Treason isn't protected by the 1st Amendment.
 
Tom Horn said:
Shoot his plane down as it flies over the coast. That always seems to work out well.
Click to expand...

Make him fly Malaysian airlines from now on. :lol:
 
VanceMack said:
Do most of you tend to ignore White Extremists as well?

Just curious. A handful of assholes with tiki torches from the Home Depot gets turned into a national spectacle with wall to wall media coverage turning the jagoffs into media stars...but you completely ignore the routine and usually televised day to day promotion of hatred...from Farrakhan.

Why?
Click to expand...

Because they agree with him.
 
American said:
Make him fly Malaysian airlines from now on. :lol:
Click to expand...

I’ve seen we like to use our frigates for that duty. Russians use their trucks.
 
Tom Horn said:
Why would I wish to kill social democrats? That’s for you national socialists to handle.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you simply don't understand the term.

- It was the "very conservatives" in Germany who embraced National Socialism, years before Hindenburg used Hitler to unite the right.

- And it was the Social Democrats who controlled the left.

And what did you just boast? Something about doing something to "1/4 of this population if you were president?"
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom