• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Special Counsel Refers Scheme Targeting Mueller to FBI

Tanngrisnir said:
No woman has said anything.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter. Mueller was accused of sexual assault, and if he was accused then a woman talked, and if that woman talked then she needs to be believed. See? It's easy. So we need to stand up for this unknown woman and believe her. #metoo
 
Herkamer63 said:
Doesn't matter who said what. If someone said it's a woman that said it, then we should take them at their word because a woman's truth should ALWAYS be believed. #metoo
Click to expand...

Thank you for the ridiculous strawman. Made my day.

Why are so many right-wingers so intellectually dishonest?
 
Herkamer63 said:
Doesn't matter. Mueller was accused of sexual assault, and if he was accused then a woman talked, and if that woman talked then she needs to be believed. See? It's easy. So we need to stand up for this unknown woman and believe her. #metoo
Click to expand...

Of course it matters. That was your standard: a woman had to say something. No woman has said anything.

You lose. Again.
 
Man, this is too easy. When someone the Left hates gets accused of a crime of something in the past, even when there's no evidence, witnesses, no timeline, no memory of where it happened, and no police report, that person is guilty as sin. In the case of rape or sexual assault, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, Roy Moore, and anyone else are, according to the Left, all guilty. They don't want them to go to jail if they did the dirty deed because that's too easy. They want them to suffer. So they keep them out of jail and everyone out in public, when they look at these people, distrust them, make their lives a living hell at their homes, be fired from their jobs, and potentially push them to commit suicide. To summarize it, the Left wants to destroy their lives

However, as soon as someone who's a beloved Leftist gets accused of something, whether if it's true or not, the Left comes up with all sorts of excuses. Using the case of rape and sexual assault again, Slick Willy Clinton, Al Franken, Cory Booker, and others like them are held up in great praise and all their accusers are just horrible, terrible liars. Slick Willy's willy was the worst of the bunch. Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, and Leslie Milwee all came forward and said he did something to them. Broaddrick said she had a witness, remembered the time, place, and the room it all happened in. What happens to her? She get smeared and called a liar. Paula Jones said that Slick Willy's willy was on full display in 1991 when she was requested to go to his hotel room. Again, same with her. Smeared and called a liar. Every woman that came forward and accused Clinton, the Left descended on them and destroyed them, even after Slick Willy admitted his affair with Monica Lewinsky, and Slick Willy was loved and adored.

But when Kavanaugh has denied allegations, with the support of people , who were named at that supposed gathering by Christine Blasey Ford, denying that it ever took place, the Left came down on Kavanaugh and claimed he and these other people who said Ford's claim was false were a bunch of liars. Now, if you want me to be honest, I don't know if Mueller did anything that he was accused of. The guy who came out with the claim could be telling a lie. None of us actually no. But it points out the double standard of the Left on the whole notion of "All women deserved to be believed", and that's you only believe them when it's a conservative being accused but not when a Leftist is the accused.
 
Herkamer63 said:
Man, this is too easy. When someone the Left hates gets accused of a crime of something in the past, even when there's no evidence, witnesses, no timeline, no memory of where it happened, and no police report, that person is guilty as sin. In the case of rape or sexual assault, Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, Roy Moore, and anyone else are, according to the Left, all guilty. They don't want them to go to jail if they did the dirty deed because that's too easy. They want them to suffer. So they keep them out of jail and everyone out in public, when they look at these people, distrust them, make their lives a living hell at their homes, be fired from their jobs, and potentially push them to commit suicide. To summarize it, the Left wants to destroy their lives

However, as soon as someone who's a beloved Leftist gets accused of something, whether if it's true or not, the Left comes up with all sorts of excuses. Using the case of rape and sexual assault again, Slick Willy Clinton, Al Franken, Cory Booker, and others like them are held up in great praise and all their accusers are just horrible, terrible liars. Slick Willy's willy was the worst of the bunch. Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, and Leslie Milwee all came forward and said he did something to them. Broaddrick said she had a witness, remembered the time, place, and the room it all happened in. What happens to her? She get smeared and called a liar. Paula Jones said that Slick Willy's willy was on full display in 1991 when she was requested to go to his hotel room. Again, same with her. Smeared and called a liar. Every woman that came forward and accused Clinton, the Left descended on them and destroyed them, even after Slick Willy admitted his affair with Monica Lewinsky, and Slick Willy was loved and adored.

But when Kavanaugh has denied allegations, with the support of people , who were named at that supposed gathering by Christine Blasey Ford, denying that it ever took place, the Left came down on Kavanaugh and claimed he and these other people who said Ford's claim was false were a bunch of liars. Now, if you want me to be honest, I don't know if Mueller did anything that he was accused of. The guy who came out with the claim could be telling a lie. None of us actually no. But it points out the double standard of the Left on the whole notion of "All women deserved to be believed", and that's you only believe them when it's a conservative being accused but not when a Leftist is the accused.
Click to expand...

Do yourself a large favor and spend a few minutes watching this and educating yourself on the clown behind this scam about Mueller.

https://link.theplatform.com/s/7wvm...ect&Tracking=true&Embedded=true&formats=MPEG4
 
Herkamer63 said:
Doesn't matter. Mueller was accused of sexual assault, and if he was accused then a woman talked, and if that woman talked then she needs to be believed. See? It's easy. So we need to stand up for this unknown woman and believe her. #metoo
Click to expand...


Mueller was accused?

Really when did that happen?
 
Herkamer63 said:
I AM addressing the topic. Mueller's a dirty, awful, violent sex offender. He's trying to bribe people $20,000 to cover it up. He's such a sicko who so sick it makes me sick. I think he should suspend the Trump-Russia investigation and have the FBI investigate him. He might be a drug addict because he looks more like a skeleton with pale skin hanging off it. Only drug addicts look like that, and only a guilty person would offer $20,000 to cover something up then purge the records. He's such a monster. Robert Mueller is guilty and needs to prove his innocence with proof of everything. Tapes, DNA samples, calendars, journals, high school year books, eyewitness report if he threw ice at someone at a bar, what he wore, his shoe size, zodiac sign, the donut he ate, the left overs he had last year, the beer he drinks, the drugs he uses. He needs to prove all this because he is GUILTY of sexual assault! #metoo
Click to expand...

And yet if all those things were proven to be true, such as in the kavanaugh case, the GOP (Grabbers Of *****) would still appoint him to the supreme Court...
 
Herkamer63 said:
Doesn't matter who said what. If someone said it's a woman that said it, then we should take them at their word because a woman's truth should ALWAYS be believed. #metoo
Click to expand...

I may believe a woman if there was one, however I do not believe a right wing proven liar who claims he has an announcement but won't release it till Thursday.
 
GDViking said:
I may believe a woman if there was one, however I do not believe a right wing proven liar who claims he has an announcement but won't release it till Thursday.
Click to expand...

See? This is what I'm talking about. You guys are proving my point as we speak. And it's funny because an accusation, that has yet to even be proven, directed at one of YOUR guys, you guys go ballistic. For the record, I'm not saying Mueller did anything of the sort. This guy making the accusation could very well be lying, so I'm not siding with him at all. I believe in INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY rather than GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT. YOUR side condemned Kavanaugh before any evidence was put forth. YOUR side didn't accept the people named denying the alleged rape even happened. YOUR side didn't even think it was suspicious at all that Ford couldn't even remember the time, the place, the day, the year, the neighborhood, the number of people, the room in which it allegedly happened in, who was all there, the changes she made in her story, who paid for the polygraph, and many others. YOUR side couldn't accept that she contradicted herself many times, like her fear of flying but yet she made over seas quickly, in less than a day to one of her vacation spots which requires FLYING. YOUR side didn't even care that you were trying to destroy someone's life and those in his family.

"WELL, KAVANAUGH'S AN ANGRY, MEAN, VIOLENT, RAPING ALCOHOLIC WHO TOSSED AN ICE CUBE AT SOMEONE IN A BAR!" But yet there's no evidence, witnesses, nor police reports to back any of this up. Being the top of his class in both college and law school also disproves he did anything because rapists are NEVER the top of their class in such things. Also, when there were 7 FBI BACKGROUND CHECKS during his time as a judge and NOTHING came up debunks the myth that he's a rapist nor does it prove he's an alcoholic. With all that presented, you guys still don't accept it because you don't care. This was a way to try and stick it to Trump and send a message to ANYONE challenges them. There, now that I got that out there, let's get back to Mueller.

Tell me this: would you guys also stand by this woman, if there is one, that comes out and accuses Muller of rape and sexual assault, same song and dance that Ford put on, or would you say she's a liar? Or how about if there's an official police report, corroborating witnesses, an exact date, time, place, year, room, number of people, neighborhood, what it's near? Would you accept it then? If so, do you think Mueller should be taken off the Trump/Russia investigation? Some people would even make the case that Mueller is trying to bribe someone with $20,000 to try and silence this person. To answer all that, I don't think you would accept it, even if there was all the evidence in the world against that says he did it. I also think even if you DID accept everything against him, you wouldn't want him off the investigation because it's all about getting the 2016 Election results overturned. Again, just so we're clear, I don't believe Mueller did anything. There has been no evidence to back it up nor any witnesses, yet. I believe he (and anyone else regardless of political ideology) is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY and not GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT. That's the way it should be for any situation. If you don't think that, then you very well could be condemning an innocent man for something he didn't do.

So to all you people responding angrily, you might want to apply this concept of innocent until proven guilty to everyone and not just the people you like. Also, learn the difference between being serious and busting someone's chops. If you really thought that I was being serious about condemning someone like Mueller with no proof, you guys might just be WAY too uptight and not understand a little satire when it's presented. But then again, you guys did prove a point: there is a double standard in this case.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom