Sure. I thought these were common knowledge, so I didn't bother including links:
You could've save time and only posted maybe the first two links, because they trade plenty of information between a few of them.
Firstly, not all of he sources are reputable. Anything from CNN in this day and age concerning Trump, is most doubtable going to be a far fetched as you can get, we very little in the way of factual reporting. Hell, I would take Vox over them and they are nearly just as much a terrible source as you can get. CNN is pretty notorious now for calling him a racist, while letting their own just run free.
The others are better, save for the NTYs. They have been pretty hit and miss as of late. Not to mention the article you linked use more anonymous sources than I would like. Such as their "
Laziness is a black trait" section of the article. Even Snopes puts that as
Mixture, simple because no one has actually heard him say it.
-The housing issue isn't covered in the article and it doesn't help that they cite themselves, without actually supplying anything informative. Muss less it covers the issue of the Park Rape case and just points out the same obscurity. This looks to be more of an issue that was his father (Fred Trumps) doing, than Donald's.
-There is nothing wrong with his statement about wanting to a well educated black man.
-The rape case was settled if memory serves and he called for such an action when it was still in the news. There is nothing wrong here as I think plenty of people had the same idea. Too bad that they cite themselves once again on this as well and use the article to basically bash conservatives like Ann Coulter and the such. Many people are still on the fence with the case. Despite it being well and done.
-Obsession with dark skinned Immigrants..:lamo I mean, are you really serious with this kind of lead right here. A majority of the immigrants that come into this country are dark skinned. So what the hell are they batting at here?
-Immigrants as racist and using MS-13 to disparage them all. No; but it is funny that they can pull al of that out of their rear ends like that. He has stated plenty of times that this was about illegal immigration and it didn't even account for all of them. Legal immigrants are fine, no issue, no muss, no fuss.
-The Muslim ban is as much a non-issue as it was before. Due to the amount of people who had become radicalized either in the state, or abroad it was a prudent call. If also somewhat rash in the approach.
-The Judge Gonzalo Curiel issue was funny, despite all their attempts to make it racist. Suggesting that someone's heritage might color their biased against you, or another person is not racism. Though the judge and Trump have butted heads before. So there might be more here.
-The Haiti HIV claim, while off the cuff and just as much in particular. Is not a baseless stance to take.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS_in_Haiti
I'm going to stop poking holes in this so called definitive list for now.
Despite what the PacificStandard article shows and it's not much. I cannot see any information that actually concludes what they are trying to sell. They cite racism and classism, yes. Yet they don't seem to try and answer why so many people that vote for Obama just jumped ship and voted for Trump, or if racism was actually such a large factor, why blacks also voted for him. Not to mention their claim of sexism and the amount of female voters he garnered.
I also must point out that this site is just as much into self gratification, as the NYTs was. In nearly every case, they cite themselves for almost all of their information and when I clicked on their post for Diana Mutz' study. It lead to her profile page and no study.
On the CNN birther article. Which I must point out is still pretty obvious what they are trying to do here.
Even the article says that Trump has let the issue go. It seems that the only ones still hanging onto such a trite notion are you and quite possibly many of the people at CNN.
Do you have any other "evidence" to supply?
