• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Text messages suggest Kavanaugh wanted to refute accuser's claim before it became public

Taylor said:
Do you have evidence that he knew about the allegations made in the New Yorker article prior to its publication? The version of events that only came to her after six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney?
Click to expand...

I have an understanding of linear time, yes.

In addition to the doppelgänger theory, we seem to now have ‘actually Kavanaugh is a time traveler’ as a defense.
 
Deuce said:
I have an understanding of linear time, yes.

In addition to the doppelgänger theory, we seem to now have ‘actually Kavanaugh is a time traveler’ as a defense.
Click to expand...
Ok then post the evidence.
 
Taylor said:
Ok then post the evidence.
Click to expand...

Texting about it before the New Yorker article requires him to know about it before the New Yorker article. How the **** is this confusing
 
Deuce said:
Texting about it before the New Yorker article requires him to know about it before the New Yorker article. How the **** is this confusing
Click to expand...
Requires him to know about what, exactly?
 
Deuce said:
The allegations. Did you read anything in this thread before posting?
Click to expand...
How does texting people "require him" to know the allegations that were made days later? We don't even know if Ramirez knew what they were going to be, lol. It took her six days of contemplation and lawyering to figure all that out. You're not making any sort of sense.
 
Taylor said:
How does texting people "require him" to know the allegations that were made days later? We don't even know if Ramirez knew what they were going to be, lol. It took her six days of contemplation and lawyering to figure all tgat out. You 're not making any sort of sense.
Click to expand...

He texted them about the allegations. How did he do that if he had never before heard of the allegations. Magic? If Brett Kavanaugh is a sorceror I don’t want him on the Supreme Court.
 
Deuce said:
He texted them about the allegations. How did he do that if he had never before heard of the allegations. Magic? If Brett Kavanaugh is a sorceror I don’t want him on the Supreme Court.
Click to expand...
Which version? What was said? How does it differ from the allegations that were made public? Look, I know you guys have very little to go on - fart jokes and ice cubes and such, but there is no perjury here. I do find it interesting that so much more time an energy has gone into trying to get him on these little nothings than has gone into going after him on the actual allegations.
 
braindrain said:
Because he didn't say what you have been trying to pretend he said. Sorry if the actual truth is getting in the way of your spin.
Click to expand...

So Grassley believes Ford's testimony according to you? Fine, we'll agree to disagree, enjoy believing your alternative facts.
 
Mustachio said:
So Grassley believes Ford's testimony according to you? Fine, we'll agree to disagree, enjoy believing your alternative facts.
Click to expand...

I don't know what he believes and neither do you.

None of that changes the fact that you got caught dishonestly trying to put words in someone else's mouth to push your little agenda.
Sad.
 
braindrain said:
I don't know what he believes and neither do you.

None of that changes the fact that you got caught dishonestly trying to put words in someone else's mouth to push your little agenda.
Sad.
Click to expand...

I was caught paraphrasing! I'm so ashamed!

It's doesn't matter now anyway. Trump's tirade would make the great commercial. In the #metoo era, do you think making fun of Dr. Ford is going to appeal to the American public? What a scumbag. And he's a lying criminal just like daddy. How he fooled you people in beyond my understanding. No it's not. You are motivated by hatred (you refers to a congregate, I have no idea what motivates you but I'd guess hatred)
 
Mustachio said:
I was caught paraphrasing! I'm so ashamed!

It's doesn't matter now anyway. Trump's tirade would make the great commercial. In the #metoo era, do you think making fun of Dr. Ford is going to appeal to the American public? What a scumbag. And he's a lying criminal just like daddy. How he fooled you people in beyond my understanding. No it's not. You are motivated by hatred (you refers to a congregate, I have no idea what motivates you but I'd guess hatred)
Click to expand...

I think you need to look up what the word paraphrasing means. It doesn't mean saying that someone said something that the never said or even implied.
What you were caught doing was being dishonest.

But you are doing a good job of demonstrating that you really don't care about the truth or Dr Ford. Only in stopping Trump. You should just be honest.

Finally you have no idea what you are talking about. I also think Trump is scumbag who I didn't vote for and never would. I cant stand that POS. But it is sad to hear that you think someone being interested in the truth is coming from a place of hatred. If you coulf get past your TDS perhaps you could reconnect with reality.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom