• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mike Pompeo floats prospect of officially ending Korean War ahead of Trump-Kim summit

TU Curmudgeon

B.A. (Sarc), LLb. (Lex Sarcasus), PhD (Sarc.)
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 7, 2018
Messages
62,527
Reaction score
19,318
Location
Lower Mainland of BC
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
From CBS News


Mike Pompeo floats prospect of officially ending Korean War ahead of Trump-Kim summit

NEW YORK-- Given the Trump administration's goal of a complete, verifiable denuclearization of North Korea during President Trump's first term, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is eager to maintain U.S.-North Korean engagement. As he prepares for upcoming discussions with the North Koreans, he is leaving one tool conspicuously on the table: the prospect of an official declaration to end the Korean War.

"It's hard to know. I don't want to prejudge precisely where we'll end up," Pompeo said this week when asked if President Trump and Kim Jong Un could sign a declaration to end the war at their next summit. "But make no mistake about it, there is real progress being made."

By leaving open the possibility, Pompeo is affirming that the U.S. is open to some form of negotiation with the North Koreans to achieve denuclearization -- and he's showing up armed with more than just demands. The Trump administration, which argues its efforts have averted war, insists it will press forward with the conversations with North Korea after a late summer stall in the dialogue.

Mr. Trump has said his next meeting with Kim will happen "in the not too distant future," at a "location to be determined" -- but not Singapore.

COMMENT:-

It appears that the US government is still working under the theory that it actually has something to do with actually ending the Korean War and that if the US government doesn't say that the Korean War is over then both the ROK and the DPRK have nothing whatsoever to say about it - but if the US government does say that the Korean War is over then neither the ROK nor the DPRK has any standing to say that it isn't.

Now I won't say that theory is wrong. About as close to that as I will come is to say that it is "boneheaded wrong" and doesn't get even as close to being correct as "wrong".

Other people (especially those with a large stake in the red tie business) probably have differing opinions.​
 
I think that this would be a positive occurrence. The two Koreas have been in talks and warming up to each other. We should have an official end to the US war against North Korea, take out US troops, and encourage better relations between the Koreas in hopes of reunification.
 
I think that this would be a positive occurrence. The two Koreas have been in talks and warming up to each other. We should have an official end to the US war against North Korea, take out US troops, and encourage better relations between the Koreas in hopes of reunification.

You know I was right with you until I hit the "official end to the US war against North Korea".

There is not now, nor has there ever been, a "US war against North Korea". Since there is no "US war against North Korea", there is no need to END any "US war against North Korea".

What UNSC Resolution 82 DID DO, was to call upon all nations to assist the ROK in "repelling an invasion" and to call upon the DPRK to "return its troops north of the ROK/DPRK demarcation line".

To understand the current situation under UNSC Resolution 82, you have to understand two things:

  1. there is NO LONGER any invasion; and
  2. the DPRK troops ARE on the northern side of the demarcation line.

Since BOTH of the stated objectives of UNSC Resolution 82 have been accomplished, UNSC Resolution is "spent".

FYI, the UN Command for Korea consists of four people (with an Australian Major in command and a Canadian Captain as 2ic) NONE of whom are Americans and NONE of whom are stationed in Korea.

What military forces do exist in the ROK is the Joint ROK/US Military Command which, by law, is always commanded by an American (despite the fact that the ratio of American military personnel to ROK military personnel is roughly 1 to 30).

[ASIDE - You might find it interesting to note that the ratio of British to Native troops in Imperial India was around 1 to 7 and that there was no disputing whether India or Britain was actually running things.]
 
Back
Top Bottom