• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ahead of pivotal Senate hearing, witnesses surface to say Christine Ford may have mistaken them for

What an "interesting" little fact. ;)


Well, if we can move beyond comments like this, maybe you can explain to me why this sharing lawyers stuff is a deal.

Is that how works? If two clients hire the same lawyers, they must be in cahoots? How do you think lawyers deal with separate cases?
 
Those facts only apply to REAL sexual assault victims, the people who are being hurt the most by the Lefts politicizing this issue for Political gain

They Left has really shown the American people people just how sick and depraved they are.
You stating she was NOT a victim of sexual assault
 
Ahead of pivotal Senate hearing, witnesses surface to say Christine Ford may have mistaken them for Kavanaugh | Fox News


So with this development and Swetnick's ex-boyfriend saying that she's lying (and that he had to put a restraining order on her), looks like the wheels are starting to come off the Democrat wagon. Frankly I think Avenatti is a shister, and so is Elizabeth Feinstein. There's just way too much doubt, and virtually no evidence to back these allegations up.

Anonymous source state they were the ones who attacked Ford.
Now you accept anonymous sources only when they substantiate your view. But as one who has read the link, how you can accept this anonymous source as credible speaks volumes about your dishonesty
Next all allegations against Kavanaugh came with named sources.
And Senator Graham who is all in on confirming Judge K has this to say about both.
Again another massive fail.
From your link


Ahead of pivotal Senate hearing, witnesses surface to say Christine Ford may have mistaken them for Kavanaugh | Fox News

It's American. That's how he rolls. For example, he had no problem whacking off to a rumor:

Latest rumor...

Ukrainian MP Andriy Derkach has revealed in a stunning revelation on Oct. 9 that former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden was paid $900,000 for lobbying activities by the gas company at the center of the whistleblower’s scandal. He has cited materials connected to an investigation.

Looking for others to confirm.

Sent from Hillary's private email server.

Always posting dishonestly.
 
It's American. That's how he rolls. For example, he had no problem whacking off to a rumor:



Always posting dishonestly.

Wow, a call out post upstairs in a dead thread. You've really outdone yourself. At least I stated it was a rumor.
 
Wow, a call out post upstairs in a dead thread. You've really outdone yourself. At least I stated it was a rumor.

It appeared on the page I opened and I didn't go digging for it. It's happened elsewhere, if you're going to be honest about things (which you won't).

:shrug:



But I understand why you would try to focus on that rather than the hypocrisy in posting a "rumor" after whining about anonymous sources.
 
Holy crap in a basket. Who in their right mind admits to what could be a felony by saying it might be them that did the crime? Unless they’re actually really the guilty party, or as I said, not in their right mind.

Ask the cops about it. They'll tell you. They have loonies coming to them all time looking to confess to all kinds of crazy ****.
 
Back
Top Bottom