• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats send 'information' concerning Kavanaugh nomination to FBI

LincolnRossiter said:
You sound upset. Maybe next time you shouldn't nominate an unethical, immoral huckster whose spent his life cutting corners, screwing people over, and rubbing elbows with NY/NJ "gaming" and "construction" personalities (read: mob) to the presidency. He's scum and he, quite predictably, staffed his campaign and administration with scum. Apparently he's even capable of digging up a scummy appeals court judge for nomination to the SCOTUS. It's like he just attracts the worst people. And that's why he and his team remain under the microscope of multiple investigations by multiple entities and are always in the news for something shady.

You reap what you sow. Deal with it.
Click to expand...

Indeed. Yet...you lost to this person.
Gee...you must be real smaaarrrt.
 
Cardinal said:
The Trump Tower meeting was collusion between the Trump Campaign and Russia.

1. In response to your next question, the answer is "Collusion is not a legal term, so no, nobody was charged for collusion, and nobody will be because, again, collusion is not a legal term. What remains to be seen is which laws, if any, were broken in the process.

2. To answer to your response after that, the answer is "Yes, the trump tower meeting was collusion. If you say it isn't, then you need to look up the meaning of 'collusion.'"

3. To answer your next response, the answer is "I said the 'Trump Campaign,' not Trump himself."

4. To answer your inevitable statement that there was nothing wrong with the meeting, the answer is "If there was nothing wrong with the meeting, then you need to address why trump and everybody associated with the meeting lied about the meeting and tried to obscure its existence."

5. To answer your next claim, "Yes, the stories kept changing."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/pol...eeting-n900191

6. To answer your inevitable response that there was nothing wrong with getting damaging info on Clinton, the answer is "Then why did he and Donald Jr. claim for nearly a year that it was about adoptions?"

7. To answer your claim that it doesn't matter anyway because the Russians didn't deliver the damaging info on Clinton, the answer is "You don't know that."

8. To answer your claim that there were no crimes committed during collusion because nobody was charged, the answer is, "the Special Counsel's investigation isn't over." This will be the same response to any question concerning why there hasn't already been some specific outcome to the investigation you're thinking of.

9. To answer your claim that there's no evidence of a crime, the answer is, "The Special Counsel isn't keeping the public directly apprised of the status of his investigation, and therefore he isn't sharing that evidence with us. We will learn what the evidence is (if there is any) when the completed report is made public." This will be the same answer to any question concerning any development within the investigation.

Hope that helps.
Click to expand...

So...you seem to know this all is provable fact.
Hell man! You need to go teach the DOJ how to conduct an investigation.

or maybe...

Pfft...come and blow all this hot air, when someone actually proves something.
 
Buzz62 said:
Indeed. Yet...you lost to this person.
Gee...you must be real smaaarrrt.
Click to expand...
Actually, I'm not Hillary Clinton. And the entire country lost. But a course correction is well underway.

Standby.
 
Buzz62 said:
So...you seem to this all this is provable fact.
Hell man! You need to go teach the DOJ how to conduct an investigations.

or maybe...

Pfft...come and blow all this hot air, when someone actually proves something.
Click to expand...

Try typing with your fingers instead of your forehead.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Democrats feel there is enough bad information attached to Kavanaugh to send to the FBI???? WTF???



CNN | Democrats send 'information' concerning Kavanaugh nomination to FBI
Click to expand...

The old "I have secret information I cannot share which sheds light on the heretofore unknown criminal activity of Judge K. which should be sufficient to force Congress to yield to democrat demands that his hearings be stopped immediately and a special prosecutor to be appointed to cast a shadow over his life for the next decade or so, depending on how long it takes the prosecutor to prove he did something bad in his life."
 
Cardinal said:
Send your evidence to the FBI, and if they agree that it's important enough to open a criminal investigation into, we can discuss that. That said, I'm not aware of criminal investigations preventing the duties of elected politicians.
Click to expand...

I have just become aware of unfortunate information involving Cardinal. A child may or may not be involved. I may or may not have forwarded this information on to the appropriate legal authorities, but I ask everyone to be circumspect, understanding the sensitivity of the matter, the trauma endured, and the need to allow this to go through proper legal channels or not. Regardless while this does or does not go through legal channels depending on what information is or is not received by law enforcement who do or do not have information on Cardinal relating to a child (it's in the name. It was there in front of us the whole time), the important thing is, Everything Cardinal Posts From Now On Must Be Viewed As Under Suspicion And Less Legitimate Due To My Undemonstrated Non-Accusation


Which, is the point. Democrats have gone from "I Must Release For I Am Spartacus" to "You Won't Believe What Susie Said About Sally To Mary, But Of Course, I Can't Tell You, But It's Just Awful".

We continue our descent into idiocy, abuse, and social-media-driven politics :(

:roll:
 
cpwill said:
I have just become aware of unfortunate information involving Cardinal. A child may or may not be involved. I may or may not have forwarded this information on to the appropriate legal authorities, but I ask everyone to be circumspect, understanding the sensitivity of the matter, the trauma endured, and the need to allow this to go through proper legal channels or not. Regardless while this does or does not go through legal channels depending on what information is or is not received by law enforcement who do or do not have information on Cardinal relating to a child (it's in the name. It was there in front of us the whole time), the important thing is, Everything Cardinal Posts From Now On Must Be Viewed As Under Suspicion And Less Legitimate Due To My Undemonstrated Non-Accusation


Which, is the point. Democrats have gone from "I Must Release For I Am Spartacus" to "You Won't Believe What Susie Said About Sally To Mary, But Of Course, I Can't Tell You, But It's Just Awful".

We continue our descent into idiocy, abuse, and social-media-driven politics :(

:roll:
Click to expand...

If you have evidence of this very serious crime then it's your duty to send it to law enforcement so they can properly ascertain its validity.
 
holbritter said:
That kind of desperation will not bode well at the polls. High school for Christ sake! Embarrassing.
Click to expand...

While the public is generally forgiving of what people have done in their teens, there are limits.

In any case, the FBI has signaled that they will not open a criminal investigation into this.
 
Cardinal said:
While the public is generally forgiving of what people have done in their teens, there are limits.

In any case, the FBI has signaled that they will not open a criminal investigation into this.
Click to expand...

Which means it was nothing serious. Ok, thanks.
 
holbritter said:
Which means it was nothing serious. Ok, thanks.
Click to expand...

That doesn't mean it wasn't anything serious, but it certainly does give the suggestion that this isn't something that falls within their purview.
 
Cardinal said:
If you have evidence of this very serious crime then it's your duty to send it to law enforcement so they can properly ascertain its validity.
Click to expand...

Yes, and in the meantime, everything you say is tainted. Because that's how this works, right? Damage through vague accusation when you can't actually find anything to pin on a guy?
 
Fenton said:
:roll:

Oh for Gods sake, they are throwing a full on temper tantrum. Sorry idiots. elections have consequences and Kavanaugh will be confirmed
Click to expand...

A curious post given the Garland incident.
 
cpwill said:
Yes, and in the meantime, everything you say is tainted. Because that's how this works, right? Damage through vague accusation when you can't actually find anything to pin on a guy?
Click to expand...

No, and I'm not aware of anything I said that would lead you to conclude I'd agree with that.
 
Samhain said:
Do you smell that? Its desperation.

Also in the letter is the proof that Mitt Romney didn't pay his taxes and Trump holds dual US-Russia citizenship.

At the same time, I've been given information from a confidential source that Diane knowingly employed a Chinese spy for 20+ years and keeps her housekeeper tied up in the basement. I've forwarded this secret information to Sam the butcher.
Click to expand...

Isn't that the same guy who has Obama's secret Kenyan birth certificate and manages Hillary's secret pedophilia ring out of a pizza joint in DC?
 
Probably an "unauthorized hug".
"He hugged me without permission! RAPE! RAPE!"

Let's look at this:
-11th hour "mystery letter"
-Person concerned wants to remain forever unidentified
-Kavanaugh has been the nominee for..what...2 months? and this is just now coming out
-Frankenstein had her chance to bring it up during the Hearings and yet said nothing.

This has all the stench of a bloated beached Blue Whale. Frankenstein's turn at being Spartacus like Corny Booker.
 
Roadvirus said:
Probably an "unauthorized hug".
"He hugged me without permission! RAPE! RAPE!"

Let's look at this:
-11th hour "mystery letter"
-Person concerned wants to remain forever unidentified
-Kavanaugh has been the nominee for..what...2 months? and this is just now coming out
-Frankenstein had her chance to bring it up during the Hearings and yet said nothing.

This has all the stench of a bloated beached Blue Whale. Frankenstein's turn at being Spartacus like Corny Booker.
Click to expand...

A hug? That's quite the assumption.
 
Erod said:
It's criminal how your Democrats are handling themselves in this "hearing". It's desperate and pathetic.
Click to expand...

Imagine how they'll act if Ginsburg croaks and Trump is still President. Man oh man...talk about the Mother of All Spaz Attacks.
 
Cardinal said:
A curious post given the Garland incident.
Click to expand...

Garland who ? What's odd about Garland was Obama's indifference over McConnell refusing to hold confirmation hearings.

I think Obama and the Democrats let it slide because Hillary was a shoe in, and they figured why put up a fuss.

Well Hillary didn't win and now they're desperate.
 
Fenton said:
Garland who ? What's odd about Garland was Obama's indifference over McConnell refusing to hold confirmation hearings.

I think Obama and the Democrats let it slide because Hillary was a shoe in, and they figured why put up a fuss.

Well Hillary didn't win and now they're desperate.
Click to expand...

That doesn't explain why McConnell refused in the first place. There was no excuse for that. Obama was just trying to be a gentleman. With the GOP, that's like trying to pet a rabid dog.
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
My thoughts exactly. Even on Kavanaugh at first. I was fine with him. He was a good choice, yet it doesn't appear he is vetted well enough.
Click to expand...

You're buying into the never Trump rhetoric. Surprise, surprise. This week it's some alluded to anonymous letter whose contents is known only to Ms. Feinstein and a couple other people to be named later. This one so serious it had to be forwarded t the FBI.

Last week it was another anonymous document supposedly written by a person high up in the Trump admin. Next week it will be something else. Crying wolf is getting a bit much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom