• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

North Carolina's gerrymandered map is unconstitutional, judges rule, and may have to be redrawn

The court could just draw their own map, or use an old one. There are lots of less than perfect alternatives that are better than what is scheduled to happen that they could choose.

In Pennsylvania? They drew their own map, and it is the map that will be used in November.

They should refuse to mail out ballots in compliance with the map. Don’t change polling places, declare the court map illegitimate and don’t cooperate. Courts were never intended to be a super legislature
 
They should refuse to mail out ballots in compliance with the map. Don’t change polling places, declare the court map illegitimate and don’t cooperate. Courts were never intended to be a super legislature

North Carolina isn't a mail ballot state like yours. Most voting is done on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November on site.

And there is plenty of room in the local jails for people who are in contempt of court.
 
North Carolina isn't a mail ballot state like yours. Most voting is done on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November on site.

Ok, so don’t print compliant ballots for the polling place


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Demanding a changing the map a few months before an election would a huge bullet point under OUR GOVERNMENT SUCKS!

This is a completely unreasonable demand, they needed to act with-in reasonable time frames, they need to be reasonable.
They can redraw boundaries with computers in an hour. It's getting the parties to agree that takes time.

But the larger issue is why should voters go to the polls this November with boundaries that are drawn to have the scale tilted to one party?
 
They can redraw boundaries with computers in an hour. It's getting the parties to agree that takes time.

But the larger issue is why should voters go to the polls this November with boundaries that are drawn to have the scale tilted to one party?

I've felt like that for 30 years in Illinois. But its not Republicans drawing the lines.
 
I've felt like that for 30 years in Illinois. But its not Republicans drawing the lines.
It’s wrong either way. I think lines should be drawn as close to uniform squares as possible to avoid politicians picking their voters.
 
It’s wrong either way. I think lines should be drawn as close to uniform squares as possible to avoid politicians picking their voters.
State legislators could fix that issue by defining how the districts are to be drawn.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
 
State legislators could fix that issue by defining how the districts are to be drawn.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk

They benefit from the Gerrymandering so why would they?
 
It's not impossible as they claim, they just don't want to because they know it will hurt them. I've been previously against computer analytic district lines being drawn due to possible corruption from programmer(s), but at this point the state government have proven they are even less reliable to do the right thing (and that includes both sides).

We shall see.
 
State legislators could fix that issue by defining how the districts are to be drawn.
They could and should -- if they believe in real democracy and not just being self-serving.
 
Back
Top Bottom