- Joined
- Jul 8, 2016
- Messages
- 18,842
- Reaction score
- 13,775
- Location
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Yeah, it's true. He didn't personally "dig up" a lot of stuff as Director of the CIA. Are we in kindergarten here?
The Russian meddling during the election did not happen "under Obama". It happened in the dark and the intelligence community has been, and apparently still is, working to ferret it out. That this takes time should not be difficult to understand.
Yeah, it's true. He didn't personally "dig up" a lot of stuff as Director of the CIA. Are we in kindergarten here?
The Russian meddling during the election did not happen "under Obama". It happened in the dark and the intelligence community has been, and apparently still is, working to ferret it out. That this takes time should not be difficult to understand.
It didn't happen in the dark. Obama had requested to be kept in the loop. Didn't you know that?
Yeah, it's true. He didn't personally "dig up" a lot of stuff as Director of the CIA. Are we in kindergarten here?
The Russian meddling during the election did not happen "under Obama". It happened in the dark and the intelligence community has been, and apparently still is, working to ferret it out. That this takes time should not be difficult to understand.
It didn't happen in the dark. Obama had requested to be kept in the loop. Didn't you know that?
bubbagone said:As CIA Chief he had deep insight but he didn't know about the good stuff - that happened during his tenure, mind you - until the media reported it.
Either he was a crappy CIA Chief or he's still lying.
Are you saying that you believe Obama wasn't fully aware of Russian meddling?
eta: and I mean WHILE President.
No. I mean the fact that the meddling occurred during his term in office does not confer on him any responsibility for it happening, nor make him responsible or his CIA director responsible for discovering all of the facts relating to it. It did make him and the CIA responsible for launching a serious investigation into it, which they did.
John Brennan: President Trump’s Claims of No Collusion Are Hogwash
he said that there was no "colusion." that's different.
https://www.vox.com/2018/7/17/17583046/trump-no-colusion-collusion-putin-helsinki-statement
:lol:
seriously, though, this dude has made some super dumb political moves which are worse than his poor spelling. eventually, just having a cultish base won't be enough to protect him, i would guess.
Perhaps the booming economy and record unemployment will.
It this where someone tells Bubbagone that CIA can monitor foreign adversaries like Russia, but cannot wholesale spy on Americans on U.S. soil.
Should we also inform him that if FBI is conducting an investigation into Americans, they can randomly share details of an ongoing investigation?
You should be on FOX news with this, they love spinning nonsense on top of absurdity, with a kiss of stupidity.
In the real world, there is plenty of evidence of Americans working with Russians to interfere in the 2016 election. He's correct that the only question remaining is will they be indicted, and will they be found guilty. Big ones in the public record are Trump Tower, along with the unnamed American in the most recent Russian hacking indictment, along with Roger Stone (and maybe Jr again) in connection with Guccifer/Wikileaks, and potentially more with Butina who infiltrated the NRA as desperately seeking old white GOP men to screw for information. We know they happily obliged to that, but what else? TBD.
Mueller is communicating with indictments and through Rosenstein.
Perhaps the booming economy and record unemployment will.
It's odd watching conservatives trash a man who played a key role in the decision to take out Osama Bin Laden. But, yeah, he's a political hack or something..
You've heard that he wrote it .... now you can read the whole thing.
When you're done, ask yourself ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/16/...tml?rref=collection/sectioncollection/opinion
It ain't there.
But one thing did jump off the screen ...
Get that?
Such a public clarion call certainly makes one wonder what Mr. Trump privately encouraged his advisers to do — and what they actually did — to win the election. While I had deep insight into Russian activities during the 2016 election, I now am aware — thanks to the reporting of an open and free press — of many more of the highly suspicious dalliances of some American citizens with people affiliated with the Russian intelligence services.
As CIA Chief he had deep insight but he didn't know about the good stuff - that happened during his tenure, mind you - until the media reported it.
Either he was a crappy CIA Chief or he's still lying.
Just joking, it's both.
#45 Has the Ultimate Ace to Grind; time for Pence/Kasich before it’s too Late
He sounds a lot like Obama. They both didn't know about the "good stuff" but learned about it from the newspaper. :lamo
Them apples don't fall far from the tree, do they?
#45 Has the Ultimate Ace to Grind; time for Pence/Kasich before it’s too Late
If the media was better at his job than he was, that makes him crappy.
You think the media uncovered something legitimate that the CIA couldn't?
Lying in a Congressional hearing makes him a liar.