• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Revokes Security Clearance of John Brennan, Former C.I.A. Director

braindrain said:
You are wasting you're time. Apparently you haven't had much interaction with that poster. He is well known for making up B.S. stories. Ask him about the time he tool out a bad guy with a throwing knife.
Click to expand...

 
Mycroft said:
There is way too much detail to go into here, but it's available on the Internet if you have a hankering to know. Suffice it to say that Brennan is a liar and he is corrupt.



It's not. And neither is him having a security clearance.
Click to expand...
So nothing eh?
 
prometeus said:
You have no clue what Brennan is doing or working on or with, so before spouting your uneducated opinion educate yourself on the topic first.
Click to expand...

Wow relax...... you said it your self its an opinion, so treat it like it no need to get hostile.

Secondly My apologies, Brennan is an MSNBC/NBC contributor

https://www.thewrap.com/ex-cia-chief-john-brennan-signs-as-msnbc-nbc-as-contributor/

So again I personally with my OWN opinion question this. Why he retains a Clearance to being a person that can go on a MSM and provide information to that may be classified.

If he is working for the government as contractor and has relevance than sure. But I dont think so,


Any ways again relax, I am privileged to my opinion and I can be respectful about it.
 
OldFatGuy said:
They certainly do not. Not in the military and not in the rest of the government.

You are a CIA Chief? God help us.
Click to expand...

When it comes to timelines, security clearances all work the same way. That is part of the set in place policy for them.

And you need to learn to figure out a joke related to play on words that you posted. You didn't say "CIA chief", rather just chief. I am a Chief Petty Officer, Chief for short, in the Navy.
 
Middleground said:
Well we all know it was in the very least Darth Cheney. But still, that is why he was charged with.
Click to expand...

I guess, if you are misinformed, like most leftists. Richard Armitage leaked the name, and did not violate the law doing so. Scooter Libby did nothing wrong, just a process crime along the way, in an investigation where Fitzgerald knew from the beginning who the leaker was, but he had to get somebody.
 
So, former communist CIA head, who goes all over the leftist media trashing Trump, lied before Congress, lies about and tries to undermine the President, gets his clearance revoked. It's about time.

My question is, why the hell does Comey still have his? Another liar and a leaker, get his revoked too.
 
Anthony60 said:
So, former communist CIA head, who goes all over the leftist media trashing Trump, lied before Congress, lies about and tries to undermine the President, gets his clearance revoked. It's about time.

My question is, why the hell does Comey still have his? Another liar and a leaker, get his revoked too.
Click to expand...

None of that is true.
 
Anthony60 said:
And, I'll throw in that Brennen should never have had a security clearance. But hey, that's me. If you vote for a Marxist, I don't really want you as CIA director.
Click to expand...

If you voted for Trump you might as well just come out and say that you voted for a Marxist.
 
roguenuke said:
When it comes to timelines, security clearances all work the same way. That is part of the set in place policy for them.

And you need to learn to figure out a joke related to play on words that you posted. You didn't say "CIA chief", rather just chief. I am a Chief Petty Officer, Chief for short, in the Navy.
Click to expand...

As a CPO you should know why you are wrong. SC's can be, and often are, mission specific. And you're conflating SOP SC basic with agency head rules and traditions. You should know better.
 
Any legal beagles here who can tell us if a sitting prez can revoke a former prez's security clearance? my guess would be'No',but I'd appreciate a definitive answer..thx in advance
 
prometeus said:
Trump Revokes Security Clearance of John Brennan, Former C.I.A. Director



https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/15/us/politics/john-brennan-security-clearance.html

Trump is a vindictive low life piece of crap.
Click to expand...

Looks as though we may have another Lester Holt like moment here with this tweet.

"Donald J. Trump
‏
Verified account

@realDonaldTrump
14h14 hours ago

The Rigged Russian Witch Hunt goes on and on as the “originators and founders” of this scam continue to be fired and demoted for their corrupt and illegal activity. All credibility is gone from this terrible Hoax, and much more will be lost as it proceeds. No Collusion! "

So once again, just like with Comey, he is saying that he wanted these people to be fired or demoted because of their connections with the Russian investigation. Keep on digging that obstruction hole, Mr President.
 
Middleground said:
From what I have read, their years of experience can resulting having them consulted on certain security matters.
Click to expand...

Without a doubt, a possibility. And for career people, an expectation. But such is still an if even for those who are trusted and with the right friends. Nothing is automatic. Brennan has a problem, he's burnt bridges. Now future income will be based on book deals, and public name recognition is more important to him than his integrity. I heard prior to today he's been seeking employment with a think tank or higher educational institution. Can't verify that. But I've also heard he is persona non grata because of integrity issues. None which had anything to do with today's events.

When Bush sr. submitted his SC, it was re-granted 4 days later by an executive order from the new CIA director. That seems to be have been the pattern with short timeline variances. A new director of any agency will usually want to milk the knowledge of a predecessor, reasonable transmission of powers inclusive of non apparent data. Better from a friendly voice than a bitter shriek.
 
Atomic Kid said:
Looks as though we may have another Lester Holt like moment here with this tweet.

"Donald J. Trump
‏
Verified account

@realDonaldTrump
14h14 hours ago

The Rigged Russian Witch Hunt goes on and on as the “originators and founders” of this scam continue to be fired and demoted for their corrupt and illegal activity. All credibility is gone from this terrible Hoax, and much more will be lost as it proceeds. No Collusion! "

So once again, just like with Comey, he is saying that he wanted these people to be fired or demoted because of their connections with the Russian investigation. Keep on digging that obstruction hole, Mr President.
Click to expand...

He is a moron. There's no other way to look at it.
 
Linc said:
Why do Veterans Bastardize their Service for #45?
Click to expand...

Speak for yourself, but I doubt you are a veteran of anything other than your own fantasies. What is wrong with people who can't show respect for the office of the presidency. Is personal hate of a particular individual best expressed by refusal to use a name? Or is it plain stupidity?

Trump has you right where he wants you. So subsumed by hate you are unable to think clearly about priorities. Silly way to react, accomplishes nothing but to diminish your own voice, gaining laughter from those you seek to convince of an alternate view from their own. For everyone, respect has to be earned, including you. One of those instance where you get what you give. Temper tantrum behavior does nothing more than increase your own nuisance factor.
 
Anthony60 said:
Except that that statement makes no sense, and has nothing to do with the point. Other than that, great!
Click to expand...

He was being supported and promoted for election by a Marxist state, was he not?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom