• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI fires Peter Strzok, months after anti-Trump texts revealed

apdst said:
I know he did. Defending this bastard doesn't make you look good.
Click to expand...

Oh, you "know" he did? Well then, as long as we have your word for it then it must be true.
 
MrMike said:
Agreed. Him and every partisan (left or right) hack in the FBI that has abused their position needs to be purged.
Click to expand...

I must have missed something, just how did he abuse his position?
 
haymarket said:
Where and when and how did he take actions to rig and election?
Click to expand...

Spying on a campaign, launching an illegal investigation to undermine a candidate, ignoring crimes to aid a candidate.
 
apdst said:
It's a fact. Strzok said he "would stop" President Trump. Surely you don't think that someone with that attitude should be working at the FBI.
Click to expand...

Every single person has a political opinion, should conservatives only be hired?
 
Cardinal said:
Which "official action" are you referring to? When you use the qualifier "official" that suggests there is a specific action you are aware of that I am not.
Click to expand...

I'm quoting the IG's report, so you will have to take it up with Horowitz.
 
apdst said:
Spying on a campaign, launching an illegal investigation to undermine a candidate, ignoring crimes to aid a candidate.
Click to expand...

There was NEVER an illegal investigation, not was anyone ever spied on. get a life!
 
apdst said:
Spying on a campaign, launching an illegal investigation to undermine a candidate, ignoring crimes to aid a candidate.
Click to expand...

You said he "rigged" an election. Oh well.

Do you have links for all of those claims? And not from one of your favorite extreme right wing hack sites like Hot Air or Gateway Pundit, please.
 
Samhain said:
I'm quoting the IG's report, so you will have to take it up with Horowitz.
Click to expand...

Are you unable to cite an "official action" that Strzok was willing to do to rig the election?
 
apdst said:
Spying on a campaign, launching an illegal investigation to undermine a candidate, ignoring crimes to aid a candidate.
Click to expand...

What you call SPYING was him doing his job. What you call and illegal investigation is a legal investigation authorized by Republicans with the legal authority to do so. What you call ignoring crimes is something he does not have the power to prosecute or indict for.

This is all in your mind caused by your own political extremism and lack of acceptance of reality.
 
Floridafan said:
Every single person has a political opinion, should conservatives only be hired?
Click to expand...

They can't let that opinion elaffect their enforcement of the law. This can't be allowed jjust like racial bias can't be allowed.
 
Mycroft said:
My take:

1. Strzok cooperated with the FBI/DOJ...just like Page and others. Because of that, he kept his...well, not "his" job, but "a" job with the FBI.

2. He eventually outlived his usefulness to the investigation.

3. He was put in front of Congress, where he made himself look like an evil fool.

4. Now that he is cut loose from the FBI, he is open for indictment...and he'll have to pay for his own lawyer.

He deserves everything he is going to get.
Click to expand...
McCabe, too.
The entire cabal.
 
Cardinal said:
Are you unable to cite an "official action" that Strzok was willing to do to rig the election?
Click to expand...

Of course the apologist Trumpkins have nothing other than their own mental delusions based on willful political extremism causing them to live in an alternate reality of their own making.
 
apdst said:
Accountability sucks. Don't it?
Click to expand...
No, I’m good with it. I’ll ask you the same thing at the end of Manafort’s trial(s) and when the rest of this investigation takes down more of the dregs in Trump’s inner circle. Keeping my fingers crossed that we can nail Trump himself as well.
 
apdst said:
He said it and Lisa Page confirmed it.
Click to expand...

Source?

Also, please source your claims that he tried to rig the election by "spying on a campaign, launching an illegal investigation to undermine a candidate, ignoring crimes to aid a candidate."

And no sourcing from one of your favorite extreme right wing hack sites like Hot Air or Gateway Pundit, please.
 
apdst said:
They can't let that opinion elaffect their enforcement of the law. This can't be allowed jjust like racial bias can't be allowed.
Click to expand...

There is nothing that either he or his girlfriend have said that has affected this investigation.
 
haymarket said:
Of course the apologist Trumpkins have nothing other than their own mental delusions based on willful political extremism causing them to live in an alternate reality of their own making.
Click to expand...

Read what you wrote to yourself... very slowly as you look in a mirror, and think about it.

:peace
 
AlbqOwl said:
Actually I hate to see this in a way. As long as he was on the payroll, he could be required to produce this or that as requested. Will be a lot harder now. But. . .he was pretty much worthless as a witness to Congress because he refused to answer any questions so it probably won't make much difference.
Click to expand...

It also means he loses his taxpayer funded retirement.
 
AlbqOwl said:
Actually I hate to see this in a way. As long as he was on the payroll, he could be required to produce this or that as requested. Will be a lot harder now. But. . .he was pretty much worthless as a witness to Congress because he refused to answer any questions so it probably won't make much difference.
Click to expand...

You must be kidding, he testified for hours and answered all questions.
 
Renae said:
It also means he loses his taxpayer funded retirement.
Click to expand...

Yup. If there's one thing Trump loves to see, it's people he hates be deprived of their livelihood.
 
MrMike said:
Read what you wrote to yourself... very slowly as you look in a mirror, and think about it.

:peace
Click to expand...

Citing polls is citing real evidence and that is what I did. Rejecting them is delusional and that is what you did.

The reality is that far too many trumpkins are working overtime to share the mental problems of their idol and this discussion proves it.
 
haymarket said:
Citing polls is citing real evidence and that is what I did. Rejecting them is delusional and that is what you did.

The reality is that far too many trumpkins are working overtime to share the mental problems of their idol and this discussion proves it.
Click to expand...

Again...

You keep describing and weakly projecting your own behavior. I can only wish you well with the acute TDS and hope that eventually, it really does gets better.

You have a nice day!
 
MrMike said:
Again...

You keep describing and weakly projecting your own behavior. I can only wish you well with the acute TDS and hope that eventually, it really does gets better.

You have a nice day!
Click to expand...

NO. I am describing the mental delusions of Trumpkins brought on by their own extremist politics. You are the one rejecting polls as a measurement of public sentiment of division.

That is rejecting reality.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom