• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Liberal 9th Circuit backs right to carry firearms in public, in latest pro-2nd Amendment ruling

Common Sense 1

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2016
Messages
18,842
Reaction score
13,776
Location
United States
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Private
A grand surprise from the 9th circuit! The correct ruling for law abiding
citizens who wish to protect themselves and their family if necessary. :cool:


Liberal 9th Circuit backs right to carry firearms in public, in latest pro-2nd Amendment ruling

Liberal 9th Circuit backs right to carry firearms in public, in latest pro-2nd Amendment ruling | Fox News

The liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals endorsed the right of individuals to carry firearms in public in a ruling Tuesday, striking down a lower court argument that the Constitution only protects that right at home.

“Analyzing the text of the Second Amendment and reviewing the relevant history, including founding-era treatises and nineteenth century case law, the panel stated that it was unpersuaded by the county’s and the state’s argument that the Second Amendment only has force within the home,” the ruling states.

The case resulted from Hawaii resident George Young being denied twice in 2011 as he sought to carry a handgun. Two of the three judges -- who were both appointed by Republican presidents -- ruled against a lower court upholding the restriction.

Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain wrote in his opinion that “for better or for worse, the Second Amendment does protect a right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense.”

In his dissent, Judge Richard Clifton said states have “long allowed for extensive regulations of and limitations on the public carry of firearms,” the order said.
 
A grand surprise from the 9th circuit! The correct ruling for law abiding
citizens who wish to protect themselves and their family if necessary. :cool:


Liberal 9th Circuit backs right to carry firearms in public, in latest pro-2nd Amendment ruling

Liberal 9th Circuit backs right to carry firearms in public, in latest pro-2nd Amendment ruling | Fox News

The liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals endorsed the right of individuals to carry firearms in public in a ruling Tuesday, striking down a lower court argument that the Constitution only protects that right at home.

“Analyzing the text of the Second Amendment and reviewing the relevant history, including founding-era treatises and nineteenth century case law, the panel stated that it was unpersuaded by the county’s and the state’s argument that the Second Amendment only has force within the home,” the ruling states.

The case resulted from Hawaii resident George Young being denied twice in 2011 as he sought to carry a handgun. Two of the three judges -- who were both appointed by Republican presidents -- ruled against a lower court upholding the restriction.

Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain wrote in his opinion that “for better or for worse, the Second Amendment does protect a right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense.”

In his dissent, Judge Richard Clifton said states have “long allowed for extensive regulations of and limitations on the public carry of firearms,” the order said.

Awesome... A liberal judge who actually knows the meaning of the second amendment.
:2dance:
 
The liberals will be along shortly to school us on Constitutional law.
 
A few of them were probably mugged recently.
 
Back
Top Bottom