• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House GOP refuses to renew election security funding as Democrats fume over Russian interference

Yes, I saw that Republicans claim there is enough funding from previous campaigns. I'm sure that's true for their own campaigns because they don't need to concern themselves with hacking attempts, because all hacking will be directed at Democratic candidates and not themselves.
Not just that there is enough funding but that there is allocated funding from the previous years that is not spent. But YOU know better. You are just SURE that isnt true.

:lamo

And its so ****ing cute watching you people do your little dance NOW about hacking. ALL of this **** happened...when? That's right..under the Obama administration. And it happened under the watchful eyes of WHO? That's right...OBAMA'S DOJ...OBAMA'S CIA. OBAMA'S Homeland Security. OBAMA'S FBI.

But NOW....you want to **** yourself over hacking. And nary a word about the people ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE for letting the bear eat all your snacks.
 
Not just that there is enough funding but that there is allocated funding from the previous years that is not spent. But YOU know better. You are just SURE that isnt true.

:lamo

And its so ****ing cute watching you people do your little dance NOW about hacking. ALL of this **** happened...when? That's right..under the Obama administration. And it happened under the watchful eyes of WHO? That's right...OBAMA'S DOJ...OBAMA'S CIA. OBAMA'S Homeland Security. OBAMA'S FBI.

But NOW....you want to **** yourself over hacking. And nary a word about the people ACTUALLY RESPONSIBLE for letting the bear eat all your snacks.

Cool beans. And are those funds enough to address the additional threats from Russian hackers?
 
The Republican party is a pack of complicit traitors.

House GOP refuses to renew election security funding as Democrats fume over Russian interference

House Republicans plan to vote Thursday on a spending bill that excludes new money for election security grants to states, provoking a furious reaction from Democrats amid a national controversy over Russian election interference.​

In light of the subject matter of your thread I have a story here that certainly offers some food for thought. If you don't mind me doing so.

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mb4ezy/top-voting-machine-vendor-admits-it-installed-remote-access-software-on-systems-sold-to-states
The nation's top voting machine maker has admitted in a letter to a federal lawmaker that the company installed remote-access software on election-management systems it sold over a period of six years, raising questions about the security of those systems and the integrity of elections that were conducted with them.

In a letter sent to Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) in April and obtained recently by Motherboard, Election Systems and Software acknowledged that it had "provided pcAnywhere remote connection software … to a small number of customers between 2000 and 2006," which was installed on the election-management system ES&S sold them.

The statement contradicts what the company told me and fact checkers for a story I wrote for the New York Times in February. At that time, a spokesperson said ES&S had never installed pcAnywhere on any election system it sold. "None of the employees, … including long-tenured employees, has any knowledge that our voting systems have ever been sold with remote-access software," the spokesperson said.

ES&S did not respond on Monday to questions from Motherboard, and it’s not clear why the company changed its response between February and April. Lawmakers, however, have subpoena powers that can compel a company to hand over documents or provide sworn testimony on a matter lawmakers are investigating, and a statement made to lawmakers that is later proven false can have greater consequence for a company than one made to reporters.
 
Cool beans. And are those funds enough to address the additional threats from Russian hackers?
Well now one would assume that since there is EXCESS money not being spent, then yes...its adequate. One would also assume that the NSA is hard at work doing their job. That is...unless the president has given them stand down orders specifically related to Russian hacking.

Oh...wait...that was the LAST administration.....

and you said dick.
 
Well now one would assume that since there is EXCESS money not being spent, then yes...its adequate. One would also assume that the NSA is hard at work doing their job. That is...unless the president has given them stand down orders specifically related to Russian hacking.

Oh...wait...that was the LAST administration.....

and you said dick.

How do you know that the remaining funds that Republicans claim exist are sufficient in order to address Russian hacking?
 
Cool beans. And are those funds enough to address the additional threats from Russian hackers?

Prove the threats are additional, then prove you have a clue about what the budget should be.
 
How do you know that the remaining funds that Republicans claim exist are sufficient in order to address Russian hacking?
Because no one has offered any evidence it ISNT and there ARE remaining funds. Oh...but we DO have plenty of people spewing their vapid partisan nonsense not knowing the first ****ing thing they are talking about claiming it ISNT adequate. Dont we.
 
Prove the threats are additional, then prove you have a clue about what the budget should be.
Hell he already proved he hadnt even READ what he was posting on til he got called out on it. Then he started posting his OH so informed OPINION that it must not be enough...because...he knows stuff....
 
Hell he already proved he hadnt even READ what he was posting on til he got called out on it. Then he started posting his OH so informed OPINION that it must not be enough...because...he knows stuff....

Leftwingers want to pretend this is the first time Russians have tried to effect our elections. The childishness and disingenuousness of this premise demonstrate willful ignorance or just pure lying. When's the last time you seen them lose their cookies over some sort of election interference by another state? Didn't the Chinese try this once, and what did liberals do? Oh wait.....

https://www.nationalreview.com/2017...clinton-reelection-campaign-media-downplayed/

There isn't a single leftwinger in the world that isn't a hypocrite on this issue.

/issue
 
Leftwingers want to pretend this is the first time Russians have tried to effect our elections. The childishness and disingenuousness of this premise demonstrate willful ignorance or just pure lying. When's the last time you seen them lose their cookies over some sort of election interference by another state? Didn't the Chinese try this once, and what did liberals do? Oh wait.....

https://www.nationalreview.com/2017...clinton-reelection-campaign-media-downplayed/

There isn't a single leftwinger in the world that isn't a hypocrite on this issue.

/issue
The most asinine thing that they do is COMPLETELY ignore the FACT that ALL of this occurred under the watchful eye of their beloved Obama...who not only KNEW about it...but actually ordered his own intel agencies to stand down. Yet they completely **** themselves over Trump and Russia. Kinda like they dont even acknowledge the video of the democrats LAUGHING at the notion that Russia is a threat, or the video of Hillary Clinton championing Russia...actually promising to STRENGTHEN Russia.

****ing insane.
 
The most asinine thing that they do is COMPLETELY ignore the FACT that ALL of this occurred under the watchful eye of their beloved Obama...who not only KNEW about it...but actually ordered his own intel agencies to stand down. Yet they completely **** themselves over Trump and Russia. Kinda like they dont even acknowledge the video of the democrats LAUGHING at the notion that Russia is a threat, or the video of Hillary Clinton championing Russia...actually promising to STRENGTHEN Russia.

****ing insane.

You know what Obama's response to Putin was about the hacking and interference? "Cut it out!"

I can't believe Putin (former KGB) didn't just **** his pants in fear over those words.
 
Because no one has offered any evidence it ISNT and there ARE remaining funds. Oh...but we DO have plenty of people spewing their vapid partisan nonsense not knowing the first ****ing thing they are talking about claiming it ISNT adequate. Dont we.

So you just took Republicans at their word.
 
So you just took Republicans at their word.
I took 2 different articles at face value without presuming I knew better than them based on nothing more than a mindless partisan hunch.
 
You know what Obama's response to Putin was about the hacking and interference? "Cut it out!"

I can't believe Putin (former KGB) didn't just **** his pants in fear over those words.

Which showed he had more balls than Trump. Putin probably **** his pants from laughter after leaving Helsinki. The entire Duma is probably rolling on floor by now.
 
Which showed he had more balls than Trump. Putin probably **** his pants from laughter after leaving Helsinki. The entire Duma is probably rolling on floor by now.

Nice dodge.
 
Back
Top Bottom