Accused Russian agent Mariia Butina tried to trade sex for influence, say prosecutors

WASHINGTON — The gunslinging Russian woman accused of cozying up to American officials to infiltrate the U.S. political system — at the behest of her Kremlin-linked mentor and with the help of her American boyfriend — allegedly tried to trade sex for influence.


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/crime-...-butina-tried-trade-sex-influence-say-n892426

Click to expand...

She would have had more success as a NYT reporter... as trading pie for scoops is accepted there.

She also would have had an easy time with Dead Chappaquidick Kennedy, as he’s a known Communist sympathizer, and with his buddy Dodd... could have used her in one of their sandwich thingies.

Or Bill Clinton... Lord knows, if it has a hole and a pulse, he’s on it.

What was she thinking? Decades of communist sympathizing on the Left, 8-years with a Manchurian Candidate, a former Commi voter heading Obama’s CIA... and she tries to make her way into the political ranks through a gun lobby? ROTFLOL...

What was she thinking?

Click to expand...

The same could be asked of you for making this nonsense thread.

thread fail .............. :failpail: ...........

Meh. As a female wannabe spy, if sex is gonna be your move....maybe....be hotter?

KevinKohler said:

Meh. As a female wannabe spy, if sex is gonna be your move....maybe....be hotter?

Click to expand...

Maybe she didn't need to be. This is "US Person 1":

zimmer said:

She would have had more success as a NYT reporter... as trading pie for scoops is accepted there.

She also would have had an easy time with Dead Chappaquidick Kennedy, as he’s a known Communist sympathizer, and with his buddy Dodd... could have used her in one of their sandwich thingies.

Or Bill Clinton... Lord knows, if it has a hole and a pulse, he’s on it.

What was she thinking? Decades of communist sympathizing on the Left, 8-years with a Manchurian Candidate, a former Commi voter heading Obama’s CIA... and she tries to make her way into the political ranks through a gun lobby? ROTFLOL...

Click to expand...

Probably could have had an easy time with President Grab'embythe***** too. And who knows? Given Trump's nauseating display of fealty toward Putin in Helsinki some Russian probably did.

Cardinal said:

Maybe she didn't need to be. This is "US Person 1":

Click to expand...

Hoo boy. There had to have been some kind of payoff or ulterior reason for her to want to jump in bed with him.

Atomic Kid said:

Hoo boy. There had to have been some kind of payoff or ulterior reason for her to want to jump in bed with him.

Click to expand...

She did it for mother Russia......Still she complained about being used by these pudgy conservative white man...

KevinKohler said:

Meh. As a female wannabe spy, if sex is gonna be your move....maybe....be hotter?

Click to expand...

Frankly, after seeing this **** for the first time I started to wonder if she was trying to play off the Avengers movie series character Black Widow - red hair, guns, female.

The Mark said:

Frankly, after seeing this **** for the first time I started to wonder if she was trying to play off the Avengers movie series character Black Widow - red hair, guns, female.

Click to expand...

Yeah....except scarlet Johnson is smoking. I'd sell government secrets for her. The other one...meh, not so much.

Cardinal said:

Maybe she didn't need to be. This is "US Person 1":

Click to expand...

I guess no one told him to watch out for red heads, eh?

zimmer said:

She would have had more success as a NYT reporter... as trading pie for scoops is accepted there.

She also would have had an easy time with Dead Chappaquidick Kennedy, as he’s a known Communist sympathizer, and with his buddy Dodd... could have used her in one of their sandwich thingies.

Or Bill Clinton... Lord knows, if it has a hole and a pulse, he’s on it.

What was she thinking? Decades of communist sympathizing on the Left, 8-years with a Manchurian Candidate, a former Commi voter heading Obama’s CIA... and she tries to make her way into the political ranks through a gun lobby? ROTFLOL...

Click to expand...

She was simply getting paid by the same people paying you. Nice sig comrade...

cuban smokes said:

thread fail .............. :failpail: ...........

Click to expand...

When the USA has traitors in office right by the balls, you give them ‘no quarter’.

They need to keep close tabs on her...Putin is known for killing witnesses

KevinKohler said:

Yeah....except scarlet Johnson is smoking. I'd sell government secrets for her. The other one...meh, not so much.

Click to expand...

Johansson, but I see your point.

It's all relative though, I'm sure for many Butina was/is been appealing.

Atomic Kid said:

Probably could have had an easy time with President Grab'embythe***** too. And who knows? Given Trump's nauseating display of fealty toward Putin in Helsinki some Russian probably did.

Click to expand...

It's more likely Trump's head was in Putin's crotch and not hers. LOL.

poweRob said:

She was simply getting paid by the same people paying you. Nice sig comrade...

Russian bots are using #WalkAway to try to wound Dems in midterms​

Click to expand...

Gay Former Democrat eloquently explains why he left The Disgusting Democrat Party... and now it’s a Russian Conspiracy... You folks will eat anything, and believe anything... except the truth... it’s sad, but at the same time...




PS. Democrats are already making excuses for losing in November... ROTFLOL...

This story fits in very nicely, very consistently, with the media/deep state narrative about Russophobia. Our propaganda never ceases. Yes Alex, there IS a war on for our minds.

ClaraD said:

They need to keep close tabs on her...Putin is known for killing witnesses

Click to expand...

You have Putin confused with the Clinton Klan.

zimmer said:

Gay Former Democrat eloquently explains why he left The Disgusting Democrat Party... and now it’s a Russian Conspiracy... You folks will eat anything, and believe anything... except the truth... it’s sad, but at the same time...

...ROTFLMFAO​

PS. Democrats are already making excuses for losing in November... ROTFLOL...

Click to expand...

There is absolutely no evidence that Democrats are going to lose in November. There is, however, an almost an unlimited supply of evidence that Democrats are going to be successful.

And the evidence is entirely based, not only on just Trump's poor socioeconomic and foreign policies, as well as his dismal and decrepit personal behavior, but also on the GOP's unwillingness to stand up for itself against their irrational mob who can't reconcile their undefined ideal of MAGA with the reality of the pile of **** that has come from it. And this is the truly sad part about this mess. In an ideal system, our two Parties would actually compete positively by being the best they can be for the nation, leaving voters feeling good about actually voting. Competition breeds excellence. However, today, because of Trump and the GOP's lack of integrity, Democrats really don't have to do anything to win. In January, all they needed was Roy Moore and Trump's endorsement, didn't they?

In the end, your original post and your reasoning behind the creation of this denigrating and bitter-inspired thread is all MAGA ever meant. The only people who can't see this are those who thought that Roy Moore, based on Orange Leader's endorsement, was a fine candidate and worthy of a leadership position within the GOP and within the United States of America.

Don't worry about things like "truth" and accusing others of believe anything. Start actually trying to figure out what MAGA even means before moving into a realization on how this blind devotion to Trump has left you all so easily manipulated into actually defending Trump's statements to support Putin, before Trump reversed what he stated as a mistake, leaving all of you without your partisan paddles. I mean, you are only one Trump Tweet or FOX News piece away from believing that gravity is made up. That is how bad this mess has gotten. And this is what voters are going to be very aware of in November.

MSgt said:

There is absolutely no evidence that Democrats are going to lose in November. There is, however, an almost unlimited supply of evidence that Democrats are going to be successful.

And the evidence is entirely based, not only on just Trump's poor socioeconomic and foreign policies, as well as his dismal and decrepit personal behavior, but also on the GOP's unwillingness to stand up for itself against their irrational mob who can't reconcile their undefined ideal of MAGA with the reality of the pile of **** that has come from it. In the end, your original post and your reasoning behind the creation of this denigrating and bitter-inspired thread is all MAGA ever meant. The only people who can't see this are those who thought that Roy Moore, based on Orange Leader's endorsement, was a fine candidate and worthy of a leadership position within the GOP and within the United States of America.

Don't worry about things like "truth" and how others will believe anything. Start actually trying to figure out what MAGA even means before moving into a realization on how easily manipulated you continue to be. I mean, you are only one Trump Tweet or FOX News piece away from believing that gravity is made up.

Click to expand...

Not sure where you are getting your numbers from
Rcp has trump rated at about 43.1% overall. That is about where obama was at the same time.
For the economy he is above 50%.

those are pretty successful numbers for a president.

you need to stop reading the liberal hack sites and start looking for better data.

Thoreau72 said:

You have Putin confused with the Clinton Klan.

Click to expand...

Putin has already sent agents to other countries to kill witnesses.

ludin said:

Not sure where you are getting your numbers from

Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure there is not a single number in my post. Perhaps you meant analysis?

ludin said:

Rcp has trump rated at about 43.1% overall. That is about where obama was at the same time.
For the economy he is above 50%.

those are pretty successful numbers for a president.

Click to expand...

Good. Let's play the simple man's game (except I will provide a link and date the poll for you)...

The 43.1% approval rating is from the period between June 27 to July 27 in RCP. Today is July 19. This period is not over. During this period, and from the source you presented, RCP also has Trump at a 52.6 disapprove rating with a -9.5 spread in its latest poll aggregate average.

Now, throughout Obama's presidency, his spread of approval/disapproval rating, according to RCP, went from +20.2 to -10.4, depending on the year. Obama's -10.4 was in 2014. The mid-term elections in 2014 saw sweeping gains by the GOP in the Senate and the House. So...what do you think a -9.5 spread for Trump this year might mean?

Now that we have actually gotten some numbers, let's use that silly brain of ours and work on the environmental analysis...

What just happened on July 16? The entire world just watched Trump crap his pants, yet again, and people across the American spectrum let him hear it. This merely foloows a year of Trump crapping his pants from one issue to the next. From bungling the immigration thing, the North Korea thing, and not the Putin thing, the man is a moron. Come November, these polls will not decide who is and is not elected in the mid-term. It's this crap from Trump that will be remembered. As it is, the vote will generally fall on ideology, despite the moron in the White House. This is routinely a given. But it is because of the moron in the White House that Democrats will show up in droves. Were this a presidential election, we may have even seen Republicans abstain, like they did for Roy Moore and like Democrats did for Hillary Clinton. You see, there are far more people in the country who understand that the economy is not based on a single man's existence, and certainly not one who just contradicted his massive tax-cut with a massive increase in spending. ...or save us all from nuclear war then called North Korea an extraordinary threat. ...or just crapped on the U.S. for Putin's sake.

ludin said:

you need to stop reading the liberal hack sites and start looking for better data.

Click to expand...

How embarrassing for you. Worry less about how best to prove your allegiance to Orange Leader and more about thinking beyond the altar.

MSgt said:

I'm pretty sure there is not a single number in my post. Perhaps you meant analysis?



Good. Let's play the simple man's game (except I will provide a link and date the poll for you)...

The 43.1% approval rating is from the period between June 27 to July 27 in RCP. Today is July 19. This period is not over. During this period, and from the source you presented, RCP also has Trump at a 52.6 disapprove rating with a -9.5 spread in its latest poll aggregate average.

Now, throughout Obama's presidency, his spread of approval/disapproval rating, according to RCP, went from +20.2 to -10.4, depending on the year. Obama's -10.4 was in 2014. The mid-term elections in 2014 saw sweeping gains by the GOP in the Senate and the House. So...what do you think a -9.5 spread for Trump this year might mean?

Now that we have actually gotten some numbers, let's use that silly brain of ours and work on the environmental analysis...

What just happened on July 16? The entire world just watched Trump crap his pants, yet again, and people across the American spectrum let him hear it. This merely foloows a year of Trump crapping his pants from one issue to the next. From bungling the immigration thing, the North Korea thing, and not the Putin thing, the man is a moron. Come November, these polls will not decide who is and is not elected in the mid-term. It's this crap from Trump that will be remembered. As it is, the vote will generally fall on ideology, despite the moron in the White House. This is routinely a given. But it is because of the moron in the White House that Democrats will show up in droves. Were this a presidential election, we may have even seen Republicans abstain, like they did for Roy Moore and like Democrats did for Hillary Clinton. You see, there are far more people in the country who understand that the economy is not based on a single man's existence, and certainly not one who just contradicted his massive tax-cut with a massive increase in spending. ...or save us all from nuclear war then called North Korea an extraordinary threat. ...or just crapped on the U.S. for Putin's sake.



How embarrassing for you. Worry less about how best to prove your allegiance to Orange Leader and more about thinking beyond the altar.

Click to expand...

No i was simply countering the argument that you made. it was pretty simple to do by just a little bit of searching.
I wasn't proving allegiance to anyone.

I was simply introducing facts instead of TDS ranting. there is a difference.