• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Summerville area woman charged with assaulting boy at community pool, assaulting deputies

1.)Posters have already agreed that you posited mental illness as the cause for a random outburts of racism absent bigotry and hatefulness:


2.)Your refusal to accept a DP challenge tells us all we need to know. It's a bit harder to debate when you can't make yourself so incomprehensible that people simply ignore you. The funniest part is that you actually agreed with a person who expressed the exact same sentiment in your posts, by saying that it just had to be a mental issueue.
LMAO another dodge and owned again!

1.) aaaaand ANOTHER lie, nobody here claimed i said what YOU claimed i did . . .NOBODY LMAO man this is fun destorying your lies
2.) your challenge is based on a lie, its based on your false and proven wrong premise. its a DESPERATE deflection thats not working and blowing up in your face much to my delight as you keep dodging and running from my challeneges and questios :)

what i did fully agree to is an official debate on what YOU CLAIMED i said . . i notice you are still running from that too and acting like it didnt happen? i wonder way? we all know why.

so here we go AGAIN:
let me know when you can support your false claim and post ONE fact that makes it true ON. . we are waiting

in fact that challenge (like i said posts ago) goes out to ANYBODY . . does ANYBODY agree with his false claim and can they prove it true . . let us know
 
LMAO anouther dodge and owned again!

I bet you thought this was a really cool expression like 10 years ago too. Anyways, here is the link to the debate challenge. You are welcome to continue shying away from it, or accept it. At this point, we've all seen you without a single piece of evidence come to the "logical" assessment that she must be mentally ill absent bigotry and racism.

You haven't explained how you arrived at such a logical conclusion based on nothing other than a news clipping. This is all given that hitting cops, and assaulting random people is not synonymous or anywhere near that with mental illness. However, you push on - after you got caught with your pants down and after you were challenged to back up your words.
 
So your answer is NO you can not. thanks!

I don’t care about your petty squabble with the other poster, I’m just trying to get you to explain what you did intend to say. Why did you capitalize “MUST”? It is a strong word on its own and you made it stronger by capitalizing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
1.) I bet you thought this was a really cool expression like 10 years ago too.
2.) Anyways, here is the link to the debate challenge.
You are welcome to continue shying away from it, or accept it.
3.) At this point, we've all seen you without a single piece of evidence come to the "logical" assessment that she must be mentally ill absent bigotry and racism.
4.) You haven't explained how you arrived at such a logical conclusion based on nothing other than a news clipping. This is all given that hitting cops, and assaulting random people is not synonymous or anywhere near that with mental illness.
5.) However, you push on - after you got caught with your pants down and after you were challenged to back up your words.

1.) AND another dodge instead of defending your false claim and accepting my challenge, again, i wonder why?
2.) yep a debate you are desperately trying to have based on your lie that was proven factually wrong, why do you keep running from the debate i said id have based on your post? hmmmmmmm
3.) good thing i dont need that since you are the only one that made that claim LMAO
4.) and another lie, i clearly explained why i think what i actually said could be true.... there is no explanation for the lie you made up
5.) aaaaand another lie i back up my actual words just fine, its your factually proven wrong lie that still has no support and you keep running from :)

i can do this all day, i love destroying lies its my second favorite thing to do here and yours was so easy. so here we go, ill ask you again and you will dodge and run again

let me know when you can support your false claim and post ONE fact that makes it true ON. . we are waiting

in fact that challenge (like i said posts ago) goes out to ANYBODY . . does ANYBODY agree with his false claim and can they prove it true . . let us know
 
1.) I don’t care about your petty squabble with the other poster, I’m just trying to get you to explain what you did intend to say.
2.) Why did you capitalize “MUST”? It is a strong word on its own and you made it stronger by capitalizing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1.) yet you posted again , like i said your answer is no. if your answer is not no, say its yes and answer my questions :shrug:
2.) because to assault people like that and bite cops i think its a safe guess to thinking there might be a mental issue involved, weird i also said right after the comma i mean i hope, also never said racism. . i wonder what that means too? LMAO
 
1.) AND another dodge instead of defending your false claim and accepting my challenge, again, i wonder why?
2.) yep a debate you are desperately trying to have based on your lie that was proven factually wrong, why do you keep running from the debate i said id have based on your post? hmmmmmmm
3.) good thing i dont need that since you are the only one that made that claim LMAO
4.) and another lie, i clearly explained why i think what i actually said could be true.... there is no explanation for the lie you made up
5.) aaaaand another lie i back up my actual words just fine, its your factually proven wrong lie that still has no support and you keep running from :)

i can do this all day, i love destroying lies its my second favorite thing to do here and yours was so easy. so here we go, ill ask you again and you will dodge and run again

let me know when you can support your false claim and post ONE fact that makes it true ON. . we are waiting

in fact that challenge (like i said posts ago) goes out to ANYBODY . . does ANYBODY agree with his false claim and can they prove it true . . let us know

Weird, you still haven't accepted a real debate challenge and have instead chosen to post here, where you cannot be regulated for spreading falsehoods and aren't forced to back up any of your logical conclusion with any facts. How quaint but it does not change the fact that you tried to associate mental health to racism and failed miserably when called on it.
 
1.) yet you posted again , like i said your answer is no. if your answer is not no, say its yes and answer my questions :shrug:
2.) because to assault people like that and bite cops i think its a safe guess to thinkn there might be a mental issue involved, weird i also said right after the comma i mean i hope. . i wonder what that means too? LMAO

You chose not to answer my questions, in this case, your dodge is noted. As for the other poster, you are looking bad not kicking his butt in the debate challenge. I'm disappointed you are avoiding his challenge, you could take him with one hand tied behind your back. On this thread, I was merely trying to get you to explain what you wrote. At this point, I was curious. It frankly isn't that important or interesting of a breaking news topic, strange that you thought it is, but whatever.
 
1.)Weird, you still haven't accepted a real debate challenge and have instead chosen to post here, where you cannot be regulated for spreading falsehoods and aren't forced to back up any of your logical conclusion with any facts.
2.) How quaint but it does not change the fact that you tried to associate mental health to racism and failed miserably when called on it.

another dodge
1.) you havent offered a real debate you offered the lie you got caught makign up
2.) another lie, i never even mentioned racism in my OP ooooooops ANOTHER reason your false cliam fails :lamo
seems your false claim dont hold water, now please support your proven wrong claims in post 10, provide one fact that makes your claim true . . ONE, thanks!
 
1.) yet you posted again , like i said your answer is no. if your answer is not no, say its yes and answer my questions :shrug:
2.) because to assault people like that and bite cops i think its a safe guess to thinking there might be a mental issue involved, weird i also said right after the comma i mean i hope, also never said racism. . i wonder what that means too? LMAO

This isn't backed by any study or fact concerning mental illness and attacks on cops. The mentally ill are actually least likely to attack cops. As a matter of fact, studies by governments show that people with mental illness have more contact with police, but are no more likely to be violent than regular people:

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2015001/article/14176-eng.htm

Homeless individuals who have a mental health disorder have been found to have increased contact with police (Canadian Mental Health Association BC Division 2005). This contact with police may not necessarily be violent in nature, and may be more likely related to minor offences that may be perceived as inappropriate, disruptive or potentially dangerous by members of the public (Fischer et al. 2008). In addition, those who are homeless and also have a mental health disorder may be in contact with police due to personal safety risks, or as a result of being a victim of a crime, since previous research has found that these individuals tend to be more vulnerable to victimization (Markowitz 2011).

Further literature:

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class journal research

The Post also recorded whether the individual killed was attacking police at the time of their death. The second and third figures display differences in behavioral characteristics as a percentage of incidents by mental health status. In both figures, we see that people with mental illness were involved in less dangerous situations: they were less likely to be armed with a projectile weapon (bottom) and they were less likely to be attacking police (middle).

You are simply incorrect, and have been found trying to bull**** people.
 
Lol, but he never said that she just has to have a mental, he said she must. Get it right.

I'm not really sure why you've got a bee under your bonnet on this subject.

The OP's comment seems appropriate - any woman who bites a cop certainly seems as if she has a little something wrong in her brain.

I don't see a comment that insists racism is a mental illness, but then again, we don't know that the woman was a racist -- just a weirdo.

She was unable to control herself, both with the boy, and then again with the cop. That's not normal, do you think?

The only suggestion of racism was from the boy's mother, and she said the slur was used before the video started. But, it wasn't a public pool and others have said the boys didn't belong there. The charges against her do not include "hate crime" so it's unlikely racism was involved.

A man who identified himself as a resident of the subdivision and a friend of Sebby-Strempel, said he was there on his own behalf. He accused one of the boys of “flipping the bird” and claimed the pool was “clearly marked that you have to be with a resident. Otherwise you would be trespassing. It’s clearly marked with several signs.”

He also alleged that the pool has various rules. “One, if you are under the age of 16 you must be accompanied by someone. You need to be there with a resident. If you can not open the gate yourself, you do not belong there,” the man contended.
https://heavy.com/news/2018/06/stephanie-sebby-strempel/

So, the kids probably should not have been there -- but the woman should have just gone ahead and called 911 as she threatened to -- and not smacked the kid - -that was totally out of line.

The worst part of all was what she did to the policemen who came to her house -- she shoved one into a wall, and he injured his knee, and she bit the other one.

Now, I don't know how folks act where you come from -- but in my opinion, it takes a special kind of loony to do that.
 
1.) You chose not to answer my questions, in this case, your dodge is noted.
2.) As for the other poster, you are looking bad not kicking his butt in the debate challenge. I'm disappointed you are avoiding his challenge
3.), you could take him with one hand tied behind your back.
4.) On this thread, I was merely trying to get you to explain what you wrote. At this point, I was curious. It frankly isn't that important or interesting of a breaking news topic, strange that you thought it is, but whatever.

1.) i directly answered it? in #2 your lie is noted LMAO
2.) based on whos opinion? yours :lamo cant debate somethign i never said :shrug:
3.) already did all that is needed is to qoute post #1 and post #10 and post number 10# fails
4.) I thought it was? weird i dont remember saying that either . . more fantasy that cant be supported.

so your answer is still no, if you want to change your answer to yes and answer my questions please let me now thanks
 
another dodge
1.) you havent offered a real debate you offered the lie you got caught makign up
2.) another lie, i never even mentioned racism in my OP ooooooops ANOTHER reason your false cliam fails :lamo
seems your false claim dont hold water, now please support your proven wrong claims in post 10, provide one fact that makes your claim true . . ONE, thanks!

So then no response to a simple debate challenge, huh? All because you got caught trying to make up a narrative without any evidence of mental illness.

How amazing.
 
1.)This isn't backed by any study or fact concerning mental illness and attacks on cops. The mentally ill are actually least likely to attack cops. As a matter of fact, studies by governments show that people with mental illness have more contact with police, but are no more likely to be violent than regular people:

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2015001/article/14176-eng.htm



Further literature:

SAGE Journals: Your gateway to world-class journal research

2.)You are simply incorrect
3.) and have been found trying to bull**** people.

1.) who said it was backed by a study??? oh thats right . . NOBODY LMAO
2.) wrong, nothing proves my hopes were incorrect or correct yet . . nothing, why did you post a lie like that?
3.) never happened in this thread, claim after claim you tried failed including this post here, all destroyed by FACTS.
now please, support your proven wrong claims in post 10, provide one fact that makes your claim true . . ONE, thanks!
 
This isn't backed by any study or fact concerning mental illness and attacks on cops. The mentally ill are actually least likely to attack cops. As a matter of fact, studies by governments show that people with mental illness have more contact with police, but are no more likely to be violent than regular people:
.

She could very well have IED mental disorder -- it would explain not only her outburst with the kids, but also with the cops.

Bottom line is -- do sane people bite cops?
 
I'm not really sure why you've got a bee under your bonnet on this subject.

I pointed out that the OP said it must be mental illness, even though there was no evidence of it. Then, they got mad, then you came in, said it takes somebody crazy to do all of this - again - just because it happened. Weird, I'm repeating what you're saying but the OP is losing his mind trying to number everything I say and hope I won't notice he's still trying to claim it's mental illness without any evidence of it.
 
So then no response to a simple debate challenge, huh? All because you got caught trying to make up a narrative without any evidence of mental illness.

How amazing.

The only lie exposed was yours over and over again :)
We are STILL waiting for you to post one fact that makes your claim in post #10 true . . one. please do so now, thanks!
 
She could very well have IED mental disorder -- it would explain not only her outburst with the kids, but also with the cops.

Bottom line is -- do sane people bite cops?

Another suggestion without a single drop of evidence. Funny.
 
The only lie exposed was yours over and oer again :)
We are STILL waiting for you to post one fact that make your claim in post #10 true . . one. please do so now, thanks!

AGENT J, show me a single piece of evidence pointing to this person being mentally ill. Here, let's see:

1. Attacks cops - not a sign of mental illness by any stretch.
2. Assaults people - not a sign of mental illness by any stretch.

Wha else do you have?
 
1.) who said it was backed by a study??? oh thats right . . NOBODY LMAO

So you've made a claim about what it must be absent racism without evidence. Amazing.
 
I pointed out that the OP said it must be mental illness, even though there was no evidence of it. Then, they got mad, then you came in, said it takes somebody crazy to do all of this - again - just because it happened. Weird, I'm repeating what you're saying but the OP is losing his mind trying to number everything I say and hope I won't notice he's still trying to claim it's mental illness without any evidence of it.

That's just a figure of speech, dude, and in my opinion, it's a valid assessment.

Why do you care?

People express their opinions every day -- all day long -- yet, you've chosen to have a hissy fit about this particular one.

It's like you're personally insulted by the idea that the woman might have a screw loose.

What gives?
 
That's just a figure of speech, dude, and in my opinion, it's a valid assessment.

It's a figure of speech to say what things must be without evidence? That's pretty moronic in any part of the country.
 
Back
Top Bottom