• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Supreme Court rules for Trump in challenge to his administration's travel ban

American

American

Trump Grump Whisperer
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
96,114
Reaction score
33,461
Location
SE Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/26/supreme-court-rules-in-trump-muslim-travel-ban-case.html

The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday in favor of President Donald Trump in Trump v. Hawaii, the controversial case regarding concerning Trump's September order to restrict travel to the U.S. for citizens of several majority Muslim countries.
In the 5-4 opinion penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, the court found that Trump's immigration restriction fell "squarely" within the president's authority. The court rejected claims that the ban was motivated by religious hostility.

"The [order] is expressly premised on legitimate purposes: preventing entry of nationals who cannot be adequately vetted and inducing other nations to improve their practices," Roberts wrote. "The text says nothing about religion."
Click to expand...



The premise from opponents has been found to be wholely ungrounded.
 
Glad they ruled correctly. The judges legislating from the bench denying this in previous law suits should be called out for their anti American foolishness.
 
Good decision!
 
late said:
Gorsuch.
Click to expand...

LOL, come off it, Gorsuch was a great choice over Obama's ****ty choice to replace a far greater man who died suddenly.
 
Last edited:
notquiteright said:
5-4 isn't wholly anything... Math still count even if it doesn't for Trump and his supporters... :peace
Click to expand...

Well all it shows is that there are 4 activist judges that need to be countered at any cost on the court.
 
I think this is the correct ruling. I never thought the statutory arguments had much merit. The Establishment Clause argument I always thought was closer, but I think the Court made a persuasive argument here that it should be subject only to rational basis review. And under that review it would have to stand.
 
As Don, jr might well accurately put it, Love it!

The whole kit and caboodle that is the leftist combined with both party establishments is beginning its slow, but rapidly gaining velocity, collapase. The cries you hear here, here here, will be from the dying gasps of dried out swamp creatures.

See yaas laters, alligators, get in the big pile crocodile...no matter how many your tears, you wont have enough to refill that old swamp.:2wave:
 
Nice to see judges rule on the actual order for once, not what they imagined it being.
 
late said:
It was the result of blatant cheating.
Click to expand...

Hardly, it was because Obama was out maneuvered. It was hardly a new thing, and if you want to talk stolen, Bork was a stolen seat what Kennedy did to him was immoral.
 
Gonna guess all the people saying this wouldn't happen won't be posting in this thread.:doh
 
Supreme Court rules for Trump in challenge to his administration's travel ban

The 5 conservative judges on the SCOTUS bench also saw nothing wrong with Texas gerrymandering intended to disenfranchise black citizens.

Supreme Court Is Cool With Texas-Style Apartheid
 
late said:
Actually, no.

All that tells us is that Republicans cheat.
Click to expand...

It proves that Liberals don't understand The Constitution. The circuit judges that blocked the travel ban should all be reviewed for their fitness to sit on the bench. They knew the travel bans were legal and if they didn't, they should have and don't need to be a federal judge.
 
Rogue Valley said:
Supreme Court rules for Trump in challenge to his administration's travel ban

The 5 conservative judges on the SCOTUS bench also saw nothing wrong with Texas gerrymandering intended to disenfranchise black citizens.

Supreme Court Is Cool With Texas-Style Apartheid
Click to expand...

That article was pure cancer. You really should vet your sources better. Sounds like it was written by a 17 year old student clueless about the world.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom