• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Melania wears 'I don't really care do u?' coat on migrant visit

Statement from the FLOTUS Communications Director

First Lady Melania Trump has arrived in Texas to take part in briefings and tours at a nonprofit social services center for children who have entered the United States illegally and a customs and border patrol processing center. Her goals are to thank law enforcement and social services providers for their hard work, lend support and hear more on how the administration can build upon the already existing efforts to reunite children with their families.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-flotus-communications-director/

"You've got four hours to get this place into shape. FLOTUS is coming."
___________


Of course, the statement is stupidly dishonest. Obama used to detain families. A court ordered them to release them. So he released them but put them in a program involving monitoring, advice, and legal orientation. 99.6% showed up at immigration court. Trump canceled that program in April 2017.

That's all need to be done to "reunite children with their families".

https://www.aclu.org/blog/immigrant...and-detention/fact-checking-family-separation

https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2017/06/ice-shuts-down-program-for-asylum-seekers/529887/




Step 1: Reunite them

Step 2: Release them.

Step 3: Restart the program.

:shrug:





It really how easily Trump seems to dupe his supporters. Or maybe it isn't duping at all. Maybe they know he's full of ****.
 
The only thing more appropriate, would be if she wore her T-shirt that says, "I'm with stupid" with an arrow that points up to herself!

Worst choice of clothing ever to wear to such an event!

She didn't wear it to the event. It was traveling gear...for the media's benefit.
 
Or maybe it really is nothing but I look forward to seeing all the people who claim they know the real story.

This woman doesn't wear $39 jackets...in fact, it is too hot for a jacket right now...it is June. So unless she is climbing Pike's Peak...it means something. Now what? I don't know, but it was very inappropriate for the visit.
 
No hidden message, my ass. I'm intrigued by this. A woman of fashion never wears a piece she doesn't mean. I'd love to know her true intention.

Not sure about that. She's into the chic fashion thing for sure. But damn. Couldn't somebody on her staff have discreetly drop a little hint about it to her just in case she wasn't aware of how it might look?
 
From the Donald:



I knew it! LOL!! Melania is just as good at trolling the media as her husband. Well played, First Lady!

Well at least she won't be accused of class, lol.
 
Not sure about that. She's into the chic fashion thing for sure. But damn. Couldn't somebody on her staff have discreetly drop a little hint about it to her just in case she wasn't aware of how it might look?

Do you seriously think no one did?
 
She didn't wear it to the event. It was traveling gear...for the media's benefit.

Really? Since when does the media film people's backsides?

Perhaps she intended for her stupid husband to read it as she was walking out the White House front door! LOL!
 
Not sure about that. She's into the chic fashion thing for sure. But damn. Couldn't somebody on her staff have discreetly drop a little hint about it to her just in case she wasn't aware of how it might look?

How it would look was the point. I dont know if she was a genius in the art of attention getting before Trump, but she is certainly now.
 
What? It was a tweet. You quoted a tweet.

No, he quoted and linked to Trump's FB page. I'm sure the tweet says the same thing, though. Did you drink a bunch of coffee or something? Didn't get enough sleep?
 
No, he quoted and linked to Trump's FB page. I'm sure the tweet says the same thing, though. Did you drink a bunch of coffee or something? Didn't get enough sleep?

So it was a tweet. Thanks for your confirmation.
 
Did Twitter buy Facebook when I wasn't looking?

I have no idea. Is there some sort of greater value that the couple of you are trying to assign to a FB post over a tweet? My point is that quoting 45 to explain his wife's behavior hours after it happened is about as bright as an overcast night.
 
Back
Top Bottom