• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI may have modified witness reports, misled DOJ watchdog with 'false information,' GOP Rep says

This right here is an example of FAKE NEWS... This thread is what is called BREAKING news and Donald Trump is not the topic of conversation.

Since you're not a mod, I could give two shakes of a piss about what you think. I made a VALID comparison and the entire Trump presidency is FAKE since he lies CONSTANTLY. Go pound sand if you don't like what I have to say.
 
~ I am wondering who will blame whom ? Will McCabe plead innocent to the actions of Strozk ? Will they both turn on Comey ?
Could get interesting ...
 

You know, if the FBI would have just recorded their interviews with Clinton and the members of her staff, those 302's would be irrelevant... Which brings up the question of why the FBI would choose to conduct all those interviews and not at least record audio on them?

Hasn't recording interviews with suspects become pretty much standard law enforcement procedure in the United States?

.
 
Trump lovers have also labeled it fake news when it's done, so cut YOUR hypocrisy.

Do you deny the recent decline of journalistic integrity and the very many recent instances of fake news? If I provide you with say... 10 example, will you STFU? Or will you continue moving goalposts and insulting people as you always have when faced with contradicting evidence?
 
Of course you do, you have a convenient answer for everything. It's called Breaking News, so try to get over yourself.

This isn't breaking news, this is breaking speculation. Maybe you've forgotten the difference... :shrug:

PS: Despite the eye roll inducing, overly aggressive response, I won't ask you to get over yourself, I know you can't... ;)
 
Do you deny the recent decline of journalistic integrity and the very many recent instances of fake news? If I provide you with say... 10 example, will you STFU? Or will you continue moving goalposts and insulting people as you always have when faced with contradicting evidence?

When you hold the actual President of the United States to a higher standard, let me know. Until then, the press has FAR less fake news than what comes out of Trumptard's mouth.
 
Have to laugh at the responses in this thread question about how the story is written using May, and possibility.
So that language is used so the story can't be true when 99% of the Trump bashing that goes on here uses that type of wording over and over and our friends here eat it up!

If this allegation is factual the FBI has major problems because their credibility will have been seriously damaged.


It's a right wing hack trying to take down the FBI. Right wingers and republicans and the Freedom Caucaus have no credibility, all these people do is lie and spin. So some hack making unproven bull**** allegations against the FBI for political purposes, gee, wonder why people laughing at this article

Man, some people have no shame at all
 
~ I am wondering who will blame whom ? Will McCabe plead innocent to the actions of Strozk ? Will they both turn on Comey ?
Could get interesting ...

McCabe is in the thick of things... Remember the "insurance policy" text from Strzok to Page?

Strzok: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office—that there’s no way he gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40…”​

Why in the hell would McCabe be engaging is such a conversation in his office the first place if politics played no factor in either the Clinton or the Spygate investigation?

.
 
When you hold the actual President of the United States to a higher standard, let me know. Until then, the press has FAR less fake news than what comes out of Trumptard's mouth.

Again with Trump... You just can't help yourself can you?

Since you talk about holding the president to a higher standard, what about the Lisa Page text to Strzok in September 2016 that said "potus wants to know everything we're doing." That would be the same president who has stated publicly that he had nothing to do with, and had no knowledge of the investigation into the Trump campaign.

Where was your "standard" then?

schultz.jpg

.
 
I like the "they may have done X" sort of thing. Real credible.

The FBI may have hired strippers for a retirement party, many of whom were illegal aliens.

lol
Another lockstepper.
 
Another lockstepper.

better than dubstep.

But no, the only thing you have right now is supposition and conspiracy theory. If there is evidence, then present it. If there is evidence, then prosecute. But you ain't got anything to back it up. Vaporware.
 
In other news, the FBI also may not have modified witness reports.

Do you even understand why people think these threads lack any credibility?

P.S. This is also why Fox News stories belong in the Conspiracy Theory section
 
better than dubstep.

But no, the only thing you have right now is supposition and conspiracy theory. If there is evidence, then present it. If there is evidence, then prosecute. But you ain't got anything to back it up. Vaporware.

I don't have anything, but apparently the IG does.
 
I don't have anything, but apparently the IG does.

Nothing solid, nothing real. We'll see what comes of it. Right now, it's just supposition.
 
Again with Trump... You just can't help yourself can you?

Since you talk about holding the president to a higher standard, what about the Lisa Page text to Strzok in September 2016 that said "potus wants to know everything we're doing." That would be the same president who has stated publicly that he had nothing to do with, and had no knowledge of the investigation into the Trump campaign.

Where was your "standard" then?
.

Wow, an out of context text. It's funny again, how you complain about the press when the president currently lies more than any other president before. Again, let me know when you hold the president at a higher standard. Until then, you have nothing worth looking at. Your partisan garbage is old.
 
Wow, an out of context text. It's funny again, how you complain about the press when the president currently lies more than any other president before. Again, let me know when you hold the president at a higher standard. Until then, you have nothing worth looking at. Your partisan garbage is old.

Again with Donald Trump?

Are really so consumed by hatred that you are incapable of engaging in any conversation without attempting to turn it into a Trump bash fest?
 
Again with Donald Trump?

Are really so consumed by hatred that you are incapable of engaging in any conversation without attempting to turn it into a Trump bash fest?

I brought a valid comparison and it's you who's been whining and crying about it. If you don't like it, go pound sand. You guys hold the media to a higher standard than the president of the United States.
 
Trump haters have been posting "if" threads and posts for over a year now. So cut you hypocrisy.

But now you agree with the "ifs" so me thinks the hypocrisy us all Yours.
 
I guess we know why the Democrats have chosen this week to suddenly be outraged by the border problems...
 
All I see here is leftwing lockstep, but nothing more. Nobody has proven Trump colluded, but you're all damn sure of it. So much so we have about 10,000 threads since last year about it.

Still acting like potential collusion is Trump’s only issue. That’s cute. Very 2017 of you.
 



"a top House Republican charged"

"raised the possibility that"




Look, I don't buy into your idiotic war on "anonymous sources" stating facts. Those should just be viewed with suspicion. But you're citing something worse. You're citing the accusations of people seeking to protect Trump as evidence that "[t]his definitely pretty. Wow, just wow."

Wow indeed.







I guess we know why the Democrats have chosen this week to suddenly be outraged by the border problems...

It was all a clever plot to use mind control worms from space to force Trump to start tweeting about the need for his policy on Saturday, and then force a bipartisan group of voters, interest groups, and politicians to all agree.

You nailed it. They probably did 9/11, too.

:applaud
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom