• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Dennis Rodman will be in Singapore for Trump-Kim summit

Praxas said:
It wasn’t but a few years ago folks like you said we shouldn’t meet with folks like Kim because it legitimizes their dictatorships. Oh wait that was with obama as president. Amazing how many trump ass kissers there are now.
Click to expand...
Ignoring kim didnt work. Thanks obama

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
danarhea said:
Y
And, BTW, that's 'grammatically". Yea, I'm half grammar and half Nazi
Click to expand...
Hey guess what, so am I and what you wrote below doesnt make sense either:
danarhea said:
You made it what it dishonestly appeared to be
Click to expand...
What does that mean ^^^ :confused:

danarhea said:
Look at me. I am a bass player with an IQ less than my age, and I could understand what he was trying to say
Click to expand...
His statement could be interpreted a bunch of different ways. Here is one way (notice where I placed the comma):

Not at all, conservatives were against obama talking or meeting with dictators because it legitimizes their dictatorships. So do you kiss your trump cutout each morning as well?
Click to expand...

Or he made a spelling error and he meant this:

No, not all conservatives were against obama talking or meeting with dictators because it legitimizes their dictatorships. So do you kiss your trump cutout each morning as well?
Click to expand...
But if you read it this way then the ending "because it legitimizes their dictatorships" doesnt make sense.

So which version is it then, cause I'm confused.
Also if you think I intentionally edited his post to make it appear something different you are dead wrong
 
Desert Storm said:
First of all your article says "some conservatives", not all of them.

Second of all, if Obama had met with KJU he probably wouldve done so out of a position of weakness, rather then out of a position of strength like Trump currently is doing.Obama's Iran deal was a nice precursor that showed him to be a weak leader by basically bribing Iran with billions of $$$.
I can't see Trump bribing NKorea to get a deal, he will get a deal by threatening them with military force.



Big difference there between Obama and Trump


EDIT: and btw nowhere in your article does it say Trump refuses to meet with Cuban leaders
Click to expand...

First of all, Obama didn't bribe anyone with billions, and the agreement with Iran worked just fine. Now what is trump gonna do if Iran restarts their nuclear program.
What position of strength is Trump negotiating with? You can be sure if NK meets with trump its because of China, not trump. Trump couldn't negotiate his way out of a paper bag. As it is, many conservatives are against a meeting with NK
 
Desert Storm said:
Hey guess what, so am I and what you wrote below doesnt make sense either:

What does that mean ^^^ :confused:


His statement could be interpreted a bunch of different ways. Here is one way (notice where I placed the comma):



Or he made a spelling error and he meant this:


But if you read it this way then the ending "because it legitimizes their dictatorships" doesnt make sense.

So which version is it then, cause I'm confused.
Also if you think I intentionally edited his post to make it appear something different you are dead wrong
Click to expand...

No it can't be interpreted a bunch of different ways, and editing it to make it look like what you wanted people to think it said is dishonest.
 
Last edited:
trouble13 said:
Ignoring kim didnt work. Thanks obama

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

That’s what you cons wanted before trumptard. Anything else and you guys called it appeasement just to talk with them you hypocrites!
 
Floridafan said:
First of all, Obama didn't bribe anyone with billions
Click to expand...
It was millions. It was officially for the release of hostages, but nobody believes that: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...u-s-law/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.801dc7eaafda

Do you really think Trump would pay hundreds of millions of dollars to get hostages released??
No, in fact he got 3 of them released from NKorea for free :lol:

Floridafan said:
What position of strength is Trump negotiating with?
Click to expand...
Military strength??

Floridafan said:
As it is, many conservatives are against a meeting with NK
Click to expand...
Horse****!! Most conservatives sites (and comments posted) I've read are all for a NKorea deal
 
trouble13 said:
I can verify for a fact that he never asked me

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Yeah you guys all lock and step lambasted obama for even talking to our enemies. Cons are the biggest hypocrites on the planet.
 
danarhea said:
No it can't be interpreted a bunch of different ways, and editing it to make it look like you wanted people to think what it said is dishonest
Click to expand...
So why dont you tell us Missy the bass player what exactly he meant, because I'm still not sure.
And lets just assume you have a far greater IQ then me, so I need help having it explained to me
 
Praxas said:
That’s what you cons wanted before trumptard. Anything else and you guys called it appeasement just to talk with them you hypocrites!
Click to expand...
Ouch, you got me. Its true i had no confidence that obama could negotiate his way out of a paper bag let alone onow how to out manuever a dictator. Now that trump occupies the WH i sleep easy at night.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
Ouch, you got me. Its true i had no confidence that obama could negotiate his way out of a paper bag let alone onow how to out manuever a dictator. Now that trump occupies the WH i sleep easy at night.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

At least you admit you glaring hypocrisy. This is why cons should never be trusted with any type of power.
 
Praxas said:
Yeah you guys all lock and step lambasted obama for even talking to our enemies. Cons are the biggest hypocrites on the planet.
Click to expand...
Not me, i never lambasted him for talking to them. I lambasted him for the things he said and agreed too.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Praxas said:
At least you admit you glaring hypocrisy. This is why cons should never be trusted with any type of power.
Click to expand...
Dont ne afraid of success, you should join us over here. Trump was wrong we dont get tired of winning

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
trouble13 said:
Dont ne afraid of success, you should join us over here. Trump was wrong we dont get tired of winning

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Trump supporter aren’t winning, they are just proving what anti American idiots and deplorables they really are.
 
Praxas said:
Trump supporter aren’t winning, they are just proving what anti American idiots and deplorables they really are.
Click to expand...

Don't be so insulting of idiots. LOL.
 
Praxas said:
Trump supporter aren’t winning, they are just proving what anti American idiots and deplorables they really are.
Click to expand...
I can smell the fear from your party all the way over here.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
 
Casper said:
Keep him at least a mile from the site of the meeting, he has nothing to add.
Click to expand...


Except Rodman has had more face to face time with Kim than practically any other US citizen. And except that Kim and Rodman do already have some form of a relationship. And Kim seems to have more respect for Rodman than he had for either Obama or Trump. Only a fool would dismiss what Rodman can add, or be prejudice against him over outward appearances. Rodman may not be useful in specifics of the deal, but his knowledge and relationship with Kim will be helpful in the ice breaking and awkward tension associated with first meetings. He very well may be only person in the room who has shaken Kim's hand before that's not Korean.


He isn't your typical first choice but given everything together he is a good choice to bring along.
 
Desert Storm said:
Actually his post wasnt grammarly sound (read the first few words I bolded). Thats why I ask him the question.
"Not at all conservatives"?? What the hell does that mean?? :confused:



BTW is "grammarly" a word.....LOL??
Click to expand...

Actually, he simply omitted a comma, which should have been apparent to anyone reading the sentence:

Not at all, conservatives were against obama talking or meeting with dictators because it legitimizes their dictatorships...
Click to expand...

Dana was correct; your misstatement and presumptive elimination of the first two words substantially changed the context, as was no doubt your intention.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom