• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Acting ethics chief flags Trump financial disclosure form for Rod Rosenstein

Mycroft said:
What has he done that's illegal?

Don't bother answering. Nothing is the correct answer.

But Mueller is fully capable of trumping something up...even if it's nothing. Too bad, though. Mueller can't even do that because he can't indict.

The Trump haters are angry. I don't blame them. But it's going to get worse. The Trump haters are going to see corrupt Obama administration official getting indicted. They are going to see the entire "Russia" thing implode.

And after all that...Trump will still be President.
Click to expand...

We don’t know what Mueller has. You have to be an extreme optimist to think there’s no way Mueller has uncovered anything. He’s indicted a lot of people close to Trump.
 
iliveonramen said:
We don’t know what Mueller has. You have to be an extreme optimist to think there’s no way Mueller has uncovered anything. He’s indicted a lot of people close to Trump.
Click to expand...

There is nothing for Mueller to have.
 
biff_poindexter said:
I don't think so, and if it is illegal -- he didn't mean it or even knew it was illegal. He will be fine.

Obama broke the law a hundred times
Click to expand...
Can you enlighten me on these hundred times?
 
Mycroft said:
Well...okay then. There you go. All I'm doing is being useful to Putin.

Way to play the Russian card. That's something that's only done when you have nothing else.

btw, I suggest you read the Strzok/Page texts. You might learn something. Or...don't. Your choice. But you are going to hear about them again...along with a lot of other stuff when the indictments start coming. (and I'm not talking about Trump indictments)
Click to expand...

Time will tell.
 
Parrish said:
Time will tell.
Click to expand...

What's interesting is that the other stuff is coming very soon.

There was a WSJ story...behind their paywall, of course...that Horowitz is taking the next step in the process to release part of his IG investigation report. This part concerns the FBI's handling of the Hillary email investigation.

Wall Street Journal – Multiple subjects of a report on the Justice Department’s handling of a 2016 investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email use have been notified that they can privately review the report by week’s end, signaling t he long-awaited document is nearing release.

The report is likely to reignite the volatile debate over the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s handling of the Clinton probe, and it will put Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department’s inspector general, in a familiar place—taking aim at members of the law enforcement community.


Those invited to review the report were told they would have to sign nondisclosure agreements in order to read it, people familiar with the matter said. They are expected to have a few days to craft a response to any criticism in the report, which will then be incorporated in the final version to be released in coming weeks. (more)

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...ton-email-investigation-for-principal-review/
Click to expand...

After this review process, this part of the report will be submitted to the DOJ and they'll consider the next course of action.

But there is more coming. Here are some of the things Horowitz is investigating:

doj-oig-investigation-1.jpg


The wailing from the left will be deafening.
 
tres borrachos said:
You apparently remembered it wrong. The rest of us remembered it right.
Click to expand...

Ask around, most don't recall him saying "woman." Most don't remember what he said at all. Most don't care. The jokes got stale.

You only get to speak for yourself. There is no "us."
 
OldFatGuy said:
Ask around, most don't recall him saying "woman." Most don't remember what he said at all. Most don't care. The jokes got stale.

You only get to speak for yourself. There is no "us."
Click to expand...

Interesting irony in your post. First you says this:

most don't recall him saying "woman." Most don't remember what he said at all. Most don't care

Then go on to tell me I only get to speak for myself.

Is this the new logic in Trump Fan Nation when you are corrected on a completely false statement, and you have no choice but to continue making yourself look foolish?
 
jmotivator said:
Bonus points for staying in character with the Fatty Arbuckle reference! :lamo
Click to expand...

The shame of all this, is like Fatty who tried in the media and sent to jail while innocent, is the Mueller is a straight up guy. A man who expects his subordinates and compatriots to be as honest and forthright as himself. He keeps getting smacked down by the sycophants and perverts of American politics, none having an honest bone in their bodies. And it is happening to him again.
 
OldFatGuy said:
The shame of all this, is like Fatty who tried in the media and sent to jail while innocent, is the Mueller is a straight up guy. A man who expects his subordinates and compatriots to be as honest and forthright as himself. He keeps getting smacked down by the sycophants and perverts of American politics, none having an honest bone in their bodies. And it is happening to him again.
Click to expand...

While they may have nothing to do with his investigation, the fact is Mueller has plenty of bones in his closet. Given the eagerness with which the Trump haters bring up Trump's bones, the Mueller haters are fully justified in bringing up his bones.

Sorry, but that's just how this stuff works nowadays.

Some of us don't care about the bones, though. We prefer facts.
 
tres borrachos said:
Interesting irony in your post. First you says this:

most don't recall him saying "woman." Most don't remember what he said at all. Most don't care

Then go on to tell me I only get to speak for myself.

Is this the new logic in Trump Fan Nation when you are corrected on a completely false statement, and you have no choice but to continue making yourself look foolish?
Click to expand...

Why ask me, when you assume I am part of Trump's fan club?

Ask for yourself. You'll most of those you ask will have no idea what you are asking about. One of my neighbors recently asked if Hilary was married to a guy named Bill? I asked which Hilary? She said Duff.

Most people do not care about national politics. They have more important concerns, for instance, what is on TV tonight? What's on sale at the supermarket? Where is Kenya West these days? And the headlines, another mutlmillion dollar payday sports guy just got busted for (fill in the blank_). I'm going to the dentist tomorrow and I'm sick to my stomach. Is it supposed to rain again tomorrow? Oh, what a cute puppy. You know, real life.
 
OldFatGuy said:
Why ask me, when you assume I am part of Trump's fan club?

Ask for yourself. You'll most of those you ask will have no idea what you are asking about. One of my neighbors recently asked if Hilary was married to a guy named Bill? I asked which Hilary? She said Duff.

Most people do not care about national politics. They have more important concerns, for instance, what is on TV tonight? What's on sale at the supermarket? Where is Kenya West these days? And the headlines, another mutlmillion dollar payday sports guy just got busted for (fill in the blank_). I'm going to the dentist tomorrow and I'm sick to my stomach. Is it supposed to rain again tomorrow? Oh, what a cute puppy. You know, real life.
Click to expand...

Because your neighbor confuses Hilary Duff with Hillary Clinton means that most people think Bill Clinton said "that girl" and would be mad about it if he did it today?
 
tres borrachos said:
Because your neighbor confuses Hilary Duff with Hillary Clinton means that most people think Bill Clinton said "that girl" and would be mad about it if he did it today?
Click to expand...

Yup. She's a typical American. And she merely illustrates the issues.

Ask yourself why the Kardashians are more interesting to people than politicians? It's difficult to determine who is the biggest or has the biggest derriere. People are more interested in who Taylor Swift dumped as boyfriend than the mideast. So it goes.

It isn't the specifics of the conversation as you'd like to believe. It is the reality of fantasy. Do you understand? People are more interested in escaping their perceptions of the mundane.

During my daily wanderings, as I pass by kids in strollers, carriages, I always lean over and say, "Don't worry, one day you'll escape." Too bad I'm raising their hopes. Escaping is what they'll be trying to do all their lives.
 
OldFatGuy said:
Yup. She's a typical American. And she merely illustrates the issues.

Ask yourself why the Kardashians are more interesting to people than politicians? It's difficult to determine who is the biggest or has the biggest derriere. People are more interested in who Taylor Swift dumped as boyfriend than the mideast. So it goes.

It isn't the specifics of the conversation as you'd like to believe. It is the reality of fantasy. Do you understand? People are more interested in escaping their perceptions of the mundane.

During my daily wanderings, as I pass by kids in strollers, carriages, I always lean over and say, "Don't worry, one day you'll escape." Too bad I'm raising their hopes. Escaping is what they'll be trying to do all their lives.
Click to expand...

I've posted on here for 6 years, and I don't ever remember someone saying "Clinton called Lewinsky a girl!". Not once.

Of course many many people are more interested in Taylor Swift than politics. That's why we have a reality TV game show host as President. But what does that have to do with you saying incorrectly that Clinton called Lewinsky a girl? That soundbite I posted for you I would suspect most adult Americans heard in 1997 or whenever he said it, and for years after that. His lie was captured on video and rightfully played in a loop for ages.
 
tres borrachos said:
I've posted on here for 6 years, and I don't ever remember someone saying "Clinton called Lewinsky a girl!". Not once.

Of course many many people are more interested in Taylor Swift than politics. That's why we have a reality TV game show host as President. But what does that have to do with you saying incorrectly that Clinton called Lewinsky a girl? That soundbite I posted for you I would suspect most adult Americans heard in 1997 or whenever he said it, and for years after that. His lie was captured on video and rightfully played in a loop for ages.
Click to expand...

Here is not everywhere else. When we look around at the general ignorance of politics on the part of most Americans, for many a positive choice, you can't blame TV for Trump's campaign success. Barely half of eligible voters bother. I've heard woman and girl interchanged far to often to care, other than as a point of humor. Why you belabor a sarcastic statement is beyond me. Get a grip, it's not important at all.
 
OldFatGuy said:
Here is not everywhere else. When we look around at the general ignorance of politics on the part of most Americans, for many a positive choice, you can't blame TV for Trump's campaign success. Barely half of eligible voters bother. I've heard woman and girl interchanged far to often to care, other than as a point of humor. Why you belabor a sarcastic statement is beyond me. Get a grip, it's not important at all.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, I had no idea you were being sarcastic when you made the incorrect claim that Clinton called Lewinsky a girl. I think a lesson in posting sarcastic comments would benefit you. Yours came across as very sincere. Your posts subsequent to that also don't indicate that your original incorrect post was sarcastic.

I actually have a grip, which is why I tend to point it out to posters who make incorrect claims about something rooted in history.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom