Well, it's all very curious to me. There's the criminal referral to SDNY followed by the FBI raid and the start of preliminary proceedings. During that time, Cohen and the president both said that the president never knew that Daniels was paid. The president used a fake name on the NDA that he never signed. Cohen said he paid the NDA consideration out of his personal funds. The president again claimed he never knew anything.
Then the civil suit in CA gets stayed for ninety days so the SDNY case can proceed. Just days later, one of the president's new lawyers gets on Fox News and changes
every single aspect of both Cohen's and the president's stories.
I'm usually pretty good at finding the common thread, but this entire presidency is such a cluster that I just can't figure out this bit. Presumably the president violated campaign finance laws by accepting an "in kind" donation from Cohen under the original circumstances. So perhaps they've fixed that problem by saying that the president in fact repaid the Daniels money via Cohen's firm. But now we have lots more questions, don't we? Did the president pay Cohen when Cohen paid Daniels days before the election? If he did, why did they both lie? If he didn't, when did he? Was it still a campaign finance crime? Most importantly, what can we even believe anymore? Surely nothing that the president says, ever, nor anyone associated with him. It's just a jaw dropping disaster.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/27/politics/stormy-daniels-lawsuit-stay/index.html