Sean Hannity linked to shell companies that spent $90M on property [W:298,518]

Mason66 said:

What is considered a shell company in this instance?

Would that be a corporation?

Click to expand...

leekohler2 said:

OMG! He just told you! It’s in the OP for god’s sake! Wow, I mean, I knew ethics didn’t mean anything to the right, but man, the willful ignorance is stunning.

Click to expand...

leekohler2 said:

Seriously? Wow. Tell you what- I don’t ever want to hear anyone on the right criticize anyone lime Stormy Daniels ever again. You all have no sense of ethics whatsoever. It’s all explained in the OP. What further clarification could you possibly need?

Wait no, I think I’ve finally figured it out. As long as you can make lots of money, anything’s ok to the right. Screw integrity, professional ethics, etc.

Click to expand...

leekohler2 said:

Not surprised you don’t see it. The right never had any ethics or morals to begin with. The election of Trump proved that in spades. And what has happened since has proven it even more. There is literally nothing you people value other than power.

Click to expand...

j-mac said:

Well, maybe so....But this sort of trash is pure smear, and passes for BN? I mean come on....How many of these serial threads from this particular member does this site have the stomach for? In a time not too long ago it would have been considered spamming the site, and action would have been taken...I guess today it is all good....

The worst part of it is that there is NOTHING cited in his OP or corresponding posts in this thread that show that Hannity has done ANYTHING illegal...It's akin to gossip, more than actual news...But, that's the era that progressive liberals are ushering in....Slander, smear, innuendo, all good enough as long as it destroys the opposition....This is a war!

I hope they are up for the backlash.

Click to expand...

Yes_Minister said:

And yet your side keeps talking about investigating the Clintons, you do not apply the same standards equally to everyone.

Click to expand...

Yes_Minister said:

How do you know its baseless? Maybe its nothing or maybe he broke the law, its an unethical conflict of interest regardless.

I guess you think the rules do not apply to elite class conservatives like Hannity.

Click to expand...

justabubba said:

exactly what conflicts of interest hannity had which should be found unethical
please point them out

Click to expand...

GDViking said:

Um clearly they whitewater turned out to not be shady as it was investigated for four years and ended up in a blow job.

Do you think trumps deals will withstand the same scrutiny?

I wonder if hannity and trump were ever in a deal together or if they just shared the same mob lawyer...

Click to expand...

Yes_Minister said:

I am just saying conservatives back in the day wanted investigate the Clintons, so there is a double standard at play.

Click to expand...

leekohler2 said:

My god! It’s in the OP! What needs to be explained?! Are you seriously that blind? If you couldn’t see it in the OP, no amount of me explaining it is going to make a difference.

Click to expand...

jmotivator said:

It is clear that the seized documents from Cohen are being leaked for propaganda purposes.

YOu guys upset how much federal money these real estate companies are getting? Wait until Hannity's law suit.

Click to expand...

Yes_Minister said:

And yet your side keeps talking about investigating the Clintons, you do not apply the same standards equally to everyone.

Click to expand...

leekohler2 said:

My god! It’s in the OP! What needs to be explained?! Are you seriously that blind? If you couldn’t see it in the OP, no amount of me explaining it is going to make a difference.

Click to expand...

MateoMtnClimber said:

The article states that the information is public.

"Hannity’s chosen investment strategy is confirmed by thousands of pages of public records reviewed by the Guardian, which detail a real estate portfolio of remarkable scale that has not previously been reported."

It also reaffirms my opinion that Hannity is the lowest, most dishonest, most hypocritical scumbag on TV. He rails against the programs that make him rich and blames a former president for an inherited economy while he gets even more rich off of it. Anyway, my personal disgust for the man is immaterial, but I'm not sure this is nothing. Why can't he just be honest with his audience? At the very least, I sense a guilty conscience.

Click to expand...

Yes_Minister said:

Hannity is on a news channel, reporting on stories he had a conflict in interest in, that is unethical.

Also how do you know there is not more to this story, it could be nothing or it could lead to domething more serious, you don't know.

Your side always want to investigate the Clintons, but you want to give people like Hannity a pass, different rules for different people. Meanwhile I do not like the Clintons or Hannity, so I say apply the same rules to both of them.

Click to expand...

Anthony60 said:

Oh, no! Hannity made real estate investments and didn't disclose his person finances on the air. What a monster! Skirting the rules, because we always see hosts on CNN and MSNBC disclosing all the people they were in bed with in the Obama administration. NOT!

Click to expand...

poweRob said:

Hannity making millions off the foreclosures with help from Ben Carson's HUD. He had Ben Carson on his show to kiss his ass about how great a guy Carson is for HUD and of course didn't disclose all this. And THIS is the small "real estate" discussions Hannity had with Cohen.

Sean Hannity linked to shell companies that spent $90M on property

Fox News host Sean Hannity is linked to a group of shell companies that have spent $90 million buying hundreds of homes across the U.S through the help of foreclosures and the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Guardian reported Sunday. More than 870 homes in seven different states have been purchased over the past decade, ranging from large mansions to rentals for low-income families, according to the newspaper.

For some of the mortgages, Hannity reportedly obtained funding from HUD under the National Housing Act loan program, which was first guaranteed under President Obama’s administration. Secretary Ben Carson’s department recently increased Hannity’s original $17.9 million mortgage for purchases in Georgia by an additional $5 million, records obtained by the Guardian show. Hannity did not disclose his cooperation with HUD when he had Carson on his show last June, the Guardian noted.​

Click to expand...

Yes_Minister said:

Hannity is on a news channel, reporting on stories he had a conflict in interest in, that is unethical.

Also how do you know there is not more to this story, it could be nothing or it could lead to domething more serious, you don't know.

Your side always want to investigate the Clintons, but you want to give people like Hannity a pass, different rules for different people. Meanwhile I do not like the Clintons or Hannity, so I say apply the same rules to both of them.

Click to expand...

ludin said:

again no conflict of interest he is allowed to buy and sell realestate.

Because the clintons are always have their hands involved in unethical manners.

there is nothing unethical about buying and selling HUD homes.

Click to expand...

leekohler2 said:

Seriously? Wow. Tell you what- I don’t ever want to hear anyone on the right criticize anyone lime Stormy Daniels ever again. You all have no sense of ethics whatsoever. It’s all explained in the OP. What further clarification could you possibly need?

Wait no, I think I’ve finally figured it out. As long as you can make lots of money, anything’s ok to the right. Screw integrity, professional ethics, etc.

Click to expand...

Yes_Minister said:

If real estate deals are nothing, was White Water nothing?

Click to expand...

Moon said:

Apparently an LLC is now considered a shell company. Shell company sounds more sinister and illicit, so the drones are picking up that term.

Click to expand...

justabubba said:

then copy/paste the excerpts from the OP which prove your assertion

you can't
you won't
because such documentation of wrongdoing is not found there
plenty of speculation, but zero facts

but prove me wrong. meet my repeated challenge for you to provide facts to support your allegation

Click to expand...