• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Mueller: Paul Manafort may have been the Trump campaign's 'back channel' to Russia

JANFU said:
Pls use another source aside from the DC as I and many others do not find it credible that and they have trackers that one must white list in order to view.

Recent allegations - My words, from what has been published on various credible sources.
Question - how many US passports can a US citizen hold?

The OP is in regards to Mantafort being suspected of having a back channel to Russia. No words or comments on that?
Cohen news sources

https://www.vox.com/2018/4/13/17236660/michael-cohen-prague-trump-steele-dossier



https://www.google.com/search?q=michael+coeh+praue&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b
Click to expand...

Stop with the ad hom link attacks. The link linked the actual CNN broadcast.
 
Tanngrisnir;1068433863[B said:
]Pleny of evidence has been found[/B], and Mueller is a lifelong conservative republican, appointed by a lifelong conservative republican.

Paying attention is something I find to be very important.
Click to expand...

Plenty of evidence has been found. Really, what evidence? What crime has been committed?
 
Vern said:
let me stop you right their BF, Mueller is not a liberal and you have no idea what he's found. You need to understand as a conservative you are unable to differentiate fact from fiction especially when you really want to believe something. And that's why you quickly start commenting/whining about dossiers, Hillary, emails, DNC lawsuit. Your deflections are for your own benefit. You cant put too much thought into your beliefs hence you obediently flail about other topics.
Click to expand...

Please remind me again what evidence do you have that a crime of collusion has been committed, by whom and what did they colluded to do? We've been through this before. :2wave:
 
RAMOSS said:
And, I am sure you think that the midterms will have the Republicans picking up more of the house too.
Click to expand...

And, I am sure you think that at the midterms you have the Democrats taking back the house too.
 
JANFU said:
Mueller: Paul Manafort may have been Trump campaign 'back channel' to Russia - Business Insider



Now it just starts to come out. I am sure when the Felonies are submitted to the courts, people are going to be more than surprised

Recent allegations have Cohen meeting with Russians in Prague after Mantafort left the campaign.

I stated that Mueller would lay more charges by NLT than mid Jun so as not to be seen as interfering in the 18 elections.

I think Cohen when he sees the charges, he will flip on Trump in a New York minute, parts or all of the case will revert to Mueller.

I expect more Felonies and some of these people will be just as surprised as the rest of us
Click to expand...

Backchannel, is this another Stormy thread ?
 
MSgt said:
Burn.
Click to expand...

I like to think of it as more of a blowtorch trying to cut the armor protecting his delusions. Look how everybody who doesn't agree is his enemy and a liberal and he is free to make up any "fact" he wants. I think I need a bigger blowtorch.
 
Born Free said:
Please remind me again what evidence do you have that a crime of collusion has been committed, by whom and what did they colluded to do? We've been through this before. :2wave:
Click to expand...

Let me type this real slow for you and try to address it this time. Mueller is not a liberal and you have no idea what he's found. Try to focus on that and then we can discuss what we know.

And BF, the people feeding you information about the investigation are the same liars who told you that President Obama was born in Kenya, his BC a forgery, he wants to kill old people and of course the vile and disgusting "stand down" lies. You should be more skeptical of your conservative masters than me or Mueller
 
JANFU said:
Mueller: Paul Manafort may have been Trump campaign 'back channel' to Russia - Business Insider



Now it just starts to come out. I am sure when the Felonies are submitted to the courts, people are going to be more than surprised

Recent allegations have Cohen meeting with Russians in Prague after Mantafort left the campaign.

I stated that Mueller would lay more charges by NLT than mid Jun so as not to be seen as interfering in the 18 elections.

I think Cohen when he sees the charges, he will flip on Trump in a New York minute, parts or all of the case will revert to Mueller.

I expect more Felonies and some of these people will be just as surprised as the rest of us
Click to expand...
Here is what the article said:

Kevin Downing, Manafort's main defense lawyer, argued to US District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington, DC that Rosenstein's order appointing Mueller, which authorizes him to investigate Russia's interference in the election and "any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation," does not cover Manafort's consulting work in Ukraine.
Michael Dreeben, a seasoned prosecutor working on Mueller's team, pushed back and said they were justified in probing Manafort because of his status as Trump's campaign chairman and his "long-standing ties to Russia-backed politicians."
"Did they provide back channels to Russia?" Dreeben said. "Investigators will naturally look at those things."

That doesn't even remotely suggest that they found back channels but that it was a natural question for investigators to ask and a natural course for the investigation to take. This article provides zero evidence that any such back channel was found or ever existed.
 
hanger4 said:
Cohen says he wasn't in Prague at that time. Jake Tapper said it was a different Cohen.

*CNN’s Jake Tapper reported on the day that the dossier was published that a government source told him that a different Michael Cohen was who visited Prague.*

https://www.google.com/amp/amp.dailycaller.com/2018/04/14/michael-cohen-prague-mueller/

Jake Tapper
@jaketapper
Government source confirms different Michael Cohen was in Prague (link: http://snpy.tv/2jvhQZX) snpy.tv/2jvhQZX
9:22 AM · Jan 11, 2017

January 11, 2017 would have been Obama government sources. Why would they lie ??
Click to expand...

"Hey. I'm with the government. It wasn't trump's Michael Cohen in Prague. Pass it on."
 
Born Free said:
Please remind me again what evidence do you have that a crime of collusion has been committed, by whom and what did they colluded to do? We've been through this before. :2wave:
Click to expand...

What was the result of the DNA test in the Baxter murder?
 
Born Free said:
What is wrong with you liberals, you've been looking for COLLUSION for 18 months and found nothing. I can't count the times I've heard "looking more and more like COLLUSION to me" and "so and so is going to flip" and all that BS. Now you liberals have filed a lawsuit against Trump's campaign and the Russians and by doing so will open up all of Hillary's files, e-mails, her server and all her actions, the phony dossier paid for by Hillary and why you did not protect the DNC server after HLS said you should. I'm thrilled you filed that lawsuit now Trump has all the discovery he wants to get every document you have. And you get nothing as everything Trump had was given to Mueller and still nothing. But now your stupid lawsuit opens up every file cabinet the DNC and Hillary along with anyone involved with the Hillary campaign. Fun times ahead for the Pubs.
Click to expand...

What? You cant wait for the Mueller final report? Your no better than those ready to convict the man. People in glass houses....
 
Chomsky said:
... . But if the feds brought it out, I suspect they've got more to back it up.
Click to expand...

From the guys who brought you the Iraq lies, the Afghanistan lies, the Bush 1 Kuwait war lies, the Gulf of Tonkin lies, the ... .

And you wonder why you are the most gullible people ever.
 
hanger4 said:
Stop with the ad hom link attacks. The link linked the actual CNN broadcast.
Click to expand...

No, I mentioned DC, so give it a rest. I watched that link, I also asked some questions and provided links.
 
yankintx said:
What? You cant wait for the Mueller final report? Your no better than those ready to convict the man. People in glass houses....
Click to expand...

You forgot the house investigation found no collusion, Mueller has been at it for 15 months with all democrat lawyers and have found nothing.
 
Born Free said:
You forgot the house investigation found no collusion, Mueller has been at it for 15 months with all democrat lawyers and have found nothing.
Click to expand...

Oh and you have privileged access to what Mueller has found thus far ? Please !! Your wishful thinking has been noted. Either way it has damaged the GOP brand for the midterms, and as Martha Stewart would say, that is a good thing. Tell us, do you often presume to know what is inside a special investigators bag? How many indictments? Not bad eh. I would prefer to know if our elections were compromised and by who. The GOP, not so much.
 
JANFU said:
No, I mentioned DC, so give it a rest. I watched that link, I also asked some questions and provided links.
Click to expand...

Was DC wrong in what they reported Tapper said ??
 
PoliSciXtina said:
I'm not a liberal. I just happen to have a working brain. Thanks for assuming and acting like you know everything about me. And why are you even mentioning Hillary? Pathetic. I don't give a hoot about Hillary. She's not even the current President. The whataboutism is quite frankly getting old on this board. My stupid lawsuit? You are seriously grasping at straws and it's quite embarrassing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Oh boy you haven't seen anything yet. The whataboutism is rampant on this site, but IDK you will find anything much better elsewhere. So stick to bashing idiots for assuming what and who yo support. Sad to say, you'll get used to it after a few months.
 
Born Free said:
You forgot the house investigation found no collusion, Mueller has been at it for 15 months with all democrat lawyers and have found nothing.
Click to expand...

any rational person would agree with that.

These aren't rational people.

Not only do they disagree with it, they think you are insane for believing it. That's the level of crazy we're dealing with here.
 
Born Free said:
You forgot the house investigation found no collusion, Mueller has been at it for 15 months with all democrat lawyers and have found nothing.
Click to expand...

I am going to correct your BS lie of a post. How many of those investigators are Dems? Look it up, and come back.
 
Born Free said:
You forgot the house investigation found no collusion, Mueller has been at it for 15 months with all democrat lawyers and have found nothing.
Click to expand...

er ur BF, you were in the thread where I show Nunes lied about why Don Jr was meeting the Russians. And that is not the first time he proved he was a liar and a trump stooge. And you cant even deny it because you took the tact that it wasn't illegal.

Born Free said:
Is that a crime?
Click to expand...

So you can cling to "its not illegal" all you want but you cant deny nunes is a liar and trump stooge.
 
JoeTrumps said:
any rational person would agree with that.

These aren't rational people.

Not only do they disagree with it, they think you are insane for believing it. That's the level of crazy we're dealing with here.
Click to expand...

Crazy would be lots of things, this is not one of them. You should turn off Fox, its clouding what has become obvious except to the blatant partisan, if the shoe fits, wear it.
 
yankintx said:
Oh and you have privileged access to what Mueller has found thus far ? Please !! Your wishful thinking has been noted. Either way it has damaged the GOP brand for the midterms, and as Martha Stewart would say, that is a good thing. Tell us, do you often presume to know what is inside a special investigators bag? How many indictments? Not bad eh. I would prefer to know if our elections were compromised and by who. The GOP, not so much.
Click to expand...

I did not read it as I would not whitelist it. Also a rag, IMHO. Now the points I made? Care to rebut, reply?
 
yankintx said:
Oh and you have privileged access to what Mueller has found thus far ? Please !! Your wishful thinking has been noted. Either way it has damaged the GOP brand for the midterms, and as Martha Stewart would say, that is a good thing. Tell us, do you often presume to know what is inside a special investigators bag? How many indictments? Not bad eh. I would prefer to know if our elections were compromised and by who. The GOP, not so much.
Click to expand...

I repeat "You forgot the house by-partisan investigation found no collusion". BTW the indictments you mentioned had what to do with collusion?

In bold if that were true, you would want Mueller to investigate the phoney dossier paid for by Hillary and the FBI and the DOJ under Obama.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom