(CNN) Former Lawyer for Stormy Daniels, Karen McDougal Cooperating with Cohen Probe

GDViking said:

I love the term loony left, when it's the right that put our loony tune in Chief in office.

The right owns this cartoon character...

Click to expand...

Chomsky said:

Source: (CNN) Former Lawyer for Stormy Daniels, Karen McDougal Cooperating with Cohen probe

This article and video help demonstrate why some of us believe Michael Cohen is facing certain indictment.

Several of the three women that have come forward so far (Stormy & Karen), claim that the subject lawyer in the title - Keith Davidson - sold them out. They claim unbeknowst to them at the time, that Davidson was in cahoots with Trump & his lawyer, acting in Trump's best interests rather than theirs. In fact, in the video it appears there are at least six suspicious cases where Davidson ended-up with Cohen in these specific types of Trump related cases.

In addition, on CNN last night one of the legal guests claimed that Avenatti is not making hollow claims when he insists Cohen will be indicted within 90 days, but rather Avenatti knows this via interaction with the feds. The guest was coy about this of course, but a light-bulb went off in my head:

--> If Davidson is cooperating with the feds, Avenatti surely is as well!

I suspect by the nature of his cooperation, including the investigative paths the feds are taking him down, Avenatti may indeed have enough knowledge to put together the backing for his "90 day indictment" claims.

I think we also need to keep in mind, that WaPo reported Keith Davidson's lawyer claims Davidson never consented to being taped by Micheal Cohen. In addition, CNN claims the feds are in possession of the Cohen-Davidson tapes through their recent search warrant! I'll post (in the thread) these two source links as reference, for your perusal.

Also as an aside, I've just watched a cable pundit's hearsay claim that Davidson is supposedly furious with Cohen for his surreptitiously taping him.

So, it seems to me none of the above is good for Mr. Cohen. I suspect Micheal Cohen is in some really deep doo, here.

Click to expand...

Chomsky said:

Each case has its own merits, and to get the judge to sign-off on Cohen's warrant was no easy task. I suspect the bar was very high.

Here, the feds already have the taped conversations between Davidson & Cohen, along with Cohen's records, so if they didn't raid I suspect they are checking Davidson's honesty & forthcomingness in the matter. He may become a cooperative witness, here.

Now if you want to see some type of conspiracy against Trump via Cohen, I don't, but that doesn't mean you or others might not.

Click to expand...

Fletch said:

No, since November of 2016, the left has taken that mantel and run with it. The election of Trump really wasn't all that loony, particularly considering who you guys put up to run against him. It could easily be argued that you guys chose the one person on Earth that Trump could actually beat. Not too smart that. Kinda loony, in fact.

Click to expand...

trouble13 said:

You raise a fair point that something that goes unspoken about all this controversy is how it deflects away from the fact that clinton ran a terrible campaghin and was not very likable.

The dnc bent over backwards to help her win the nomination and the party elected her with the medias full endorsement. They all acted like it was right to inherit the presidency despite her obvious flaws and lack of effort. Now they want to blame trump voters for not capitulating to their desired outcome.

Truth is clinton failed to coalesce her party. She didnt get bernie and stein people behind her and she lost.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Click to expand...

GDViking said:

And she did not have Russia working with her.
Maybe in the next election the Democrats should get China to back their candidate and we can find out which one is best at fixings us elections.

After all foreign interference is the new normal as Trump's administration has taken zero action to combat it, however has gone out of it's way to deny it happened and pretend illegal residents had some effect on the election.

One has been 100% proven, one has been 100% disproven. Why does trump consistently ignore facts?

Click to expand...

trouble13 said:

I think there are some red flags to raise questions and its enough to merit reviewing the procedures. I dont think its unreasonable for the public to demand transparency from their gov.

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Click to expand...

j-mac said:

Couldn't get "collusion"... Couldn't get obstruction... Obama legacy being dismantled...Obama officials referred for criminal investigation.. And what now? A good 'ol fashioned sex/smear scandal using a Joe Biden operative...reeks of desperation...

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Click to expand...