• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

German town braces for neo-Nazi concert on Hitler's birthday

apdst said:
So, you would be ok with repealing the 1st Amendment?
Click to expand...

I was wondering when you would show up to defend Nazis. You're a little late. I'm afraid we've run out of the president's favorite flavor of psycho Kool-Aid.
 
MateoMtnClimber said:
I was wondering when you would show up to defend Nazis. You're a little late. I'm afraid we've run out of the president's favorite flavor of psycho Kool-Aid.
Click to expand...

Do you honestly not understand that the 1st Amendment is not about Free Speech only for those with whom you agree?
 
MateoMtnClimber said:
I was wondering when you would show up to defend Nazis. You're a little late. I'm afraid we've run out of the president's favorite flavor of psycho Kool-Aid.
Click to expand...

I'm glad to see you finally be honest about suppressing free speech. This is why you people can't win elections.
 
HowardBThiname said:
Do you honestly not understand that the 1st Amendment is not about Free Speech only for those with whom you agree?
Click to expand...

Of course not. Libbos only support The Constitution when it suits their agenda.
 
HowardBThiname said:
The social warriors are making things worse, much worse. The neo's had dwindled down to a little trickle and no one paid attention to the poorly attended rallies. Then, Obama announced that it was time to get rid of the Confederate Flag and that got everyone going. The libs decided they would be social heroes and they started opposing anything Right of center - that naturally led to a buildup of the neo's and we've been seeing the "showdowns" for the past couple of years. Now, it's a "thing" again. Just goes to show how liberals are their own worst enemies.
Click to expand...

So your explanation for the reemergence of the violent far right is . . . Obama?
 
MateoMtnClimber said:
Disgusting, isn't it? Just like the Nazi apologists and sympathizers, wouldn't you say?
Click to expand...

What's worse are the anti-American idiots who think free speech is only speech they agree with. The Left is 100% on that one.
 
HowardBThiname said:
Do you honestly not understand that the 1st Amendment is not about Free Speech only for those with whom you agree?
Click to expand...

Why the **** are you talking about the 1A? I never said the Nazis can't meet. I wondered why they're so emboldened to meet in public and how a civilized society can push them back into the sewers.
 
MateoMtnClimber said:
Why the **** are you talking about the 1A? I never said the Nazis can't meet. I wondered why they're so emboldened to meet in public and how a civilized society can push them back into the sewers.
Click to expand...

We're talking about the 1st Amendment because you're advocating the use of violence to suppress political speech you disagree with. And you call other people nazis? :lamo
 
MateoMtnClimber said:
Why the **** are you talking about the 1A? I never said the Nazis can't meet. I wondered why they're so emboldened to meet in public and how a civilized society can push them back into the sewers.
Click to expand...

We can't "push them." If we ignore them, both they, and Antifa, will crawl back to their respective sewers. It's by trying to push that you create the resistance, and they become stronger and larger. If you really want them to go away - ignore them.
 
MateoMtnClimber said:
No one ever said he isn't biracial. Get real and stop lying for the first time in your existence on this forum. We said he's the first black president. And then two of you entered some fantasy land wherein because the man is half white he isn't black. We all know what you're trying to do. It's pathetic.
Click to expand...
I notice that you liars like to call others liars. I actually don’t think you are lying on this. I think that you have had it so burned into your mind that he is black, you just can’t bring yourself to admit the truth, no matter how obvious.

He’s biracial. End of story. If you can say he’s a black man, then you can say he’s a white man. Doesn’t work. That’s why we say he is biracial. Much more accurate. Two races, biracial. Understand?

I guarantee you one thing. Once the Democrats actually do run a black person for President, they will start calling Obama biracial.


Sent from my iPhone X using Telepathy.
 
MateoMtnClimber said:
We're on the same page with "swear words". It takes a particularly warped animal to invent sounds just for the sake of insisting that they not be used. Several Asian languages don't even have a concept of "swear words" like we have, i.e., they really don't have any words that children cannot say in front of their parents or that cannot be said on television, etc. This country lost its mind when Janet Jackson's nipple flashed on TV screens. There are lots of complicated cultural undertones in there.

As far as letting racists be racists, yes, you and I disagree. We can't stop anyone from being racist and having racist ideas, of course. This is the US after all. But I strongly support anti-discrimination legislation. The reason is that history has shown us beyond a shadow of a doubt that Americans cannot be trusted to treat each other decently in the absence of legal/political intervention. It would be nice to think that if people could openly discriminate against women and racial minorities and non-straight people and religious minorities and persons with disabilities in the public realm that everyone else would just take their money and their business elsewhere. Only that's not what happens. Bigots become more self-assured. The majority will opt for convenience over ideals and continue to support those people and businesses. Smaller communities will refuse to serve minorities altogether. We've already been down the unregulated path. It didn't work. That's why we invented anti-discrimination laws in the first place.

To the extent that we allow blatant hatred, discrimination, and intolerance to exist in public, we embolden violent extremist groups like the Nazis in the OP.
Click to expand...

Actually the unregulated path did and would continue to work if given the chance. The reason anti-discrimination laws were originally created were due to local and state governments enforcing segregation. Even if they did stop selling then that opens the market up for someone to fill that position. For instance, we can use the modern example of "white flight", as more white people leave the inner city and move to the suburbs many of the white owned shops went with them, this opened up a hole in the market and gave minorities the opportunity to open their own restaurants, gas stations, stores etc. In my opinion, anti-discrimination laws cause more harm then good especially in hiring situations because it gives whites an actual advantage as they will have less risk for potential law suits.
 
apdst said:
We're talking about the 1st Amendment because you're advocating the use of violence to suppress political speech you disagree with. And you call other people nazis? :lamo
Click to expand...

Tell me more about the violence. Or the suppression. Any of it really. Provide one single post.
 
HowardBThiname said:
We can't "push them." If we ignore them, both they, and Antifa, will crawl back to their respective sewers. It's by trying to push that you create the resistance, and they become stronger and larger. If you really want them to go away - ignore them.
Click to expand...

Ah, I understand your perspective. Thanks.
 
ecofarm said:
No more good ole boy club? So sad :(
Click to expand...

All the Nazi sympathizers just stormed into this thread. It's probably lost any value and certainly has just seen an overall decimation of its collective intelligence.
 
ecofarm said:
No more good ole boy club? So sad :(
Click to expand...

"Good ole boy's club?" That's not even close to being apropos.

The people opposing the neo's are itching for a war, and, as a result, the neo numbers are growing. So are the anti numbers. It's like two gangs getting ready to rumble. It's actually the opposite of what you claim to want.

Which is why I'm hesitant to believe that you want peace at all.
 
MateoMtnClimber said:
Tell me more about the violence. Or the suppression. Any of it really. Provide one single post.
Click to expand...

Your words...

MateoMtnClimber said:
Why the **** are you talking about the 1A? I never said the Nazis can't meet. I wondered why they're so emboldened to meet in public and how a civilized society can push them back into the sewers.
Click to expand...
 
MateoMtnClimber said:
All the Nazi sympathizers just stormed into this thread. It's probably lost any value and certainly has just seen an overall decimation of its collective intelligence.
Click to expand...

The supporters of freedom, liberty and equal rights stormed into this thread.
 
Slingshot Bob said:
I live in a very mixed neighborhood and the reality here at ground level, is evident.
Click to expand...

I live in a mixed neighborhood and the evidence is, it's a pretty good neighborhood.
What IS the real meaning of "mixed neighborhood" to everyone anyway?

I guarantee you it means different things for different people. ;)

Dallas is just one example of post-1964 segregation in real estate.
HOA covenants continued to have clear cut demands that no one sell a home to a black family in neighborhoods North of I-30 all the way till the mid-1990's.
 
MateoMtnClimber said:
All the Nazi sympathizers just stormed into this thread. It's probably lost any value and certainly has just seen an overall decimation of its collective intelligence.
Click to expand...

The retort in this thread was better than most. It served as much purpose as any other thread.

And, we can always aim more towards the specific topic.
 
MateoMtnClimber said:
All the Nazi sympathizers just stormed into this thread. It's probably lost any value and certainly has just seen an overall decimation of its collective intelligence.
Click to expand...

And to all of them, thank you for not being shy about who and what you are.
I like knowing who all the Nazi sympathizers are.
And to all of them, Karl Popper says there's absolutely nothing morally wrong about refusing to tolerate intolerance, and that failing that, the intolerant will ABUSE the values of tolerance in ways which allow them to take control.

The Paradox of Tolerance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom