• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client[W:1086]

Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

It also turns out the lawyer who argued for releasing ha nits name also represents CNN and the NYT. So there was a benefit to his clients to tarnish a competitors anchor.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

The attorney had no idea that the third client worked for Fox News. Stop inventing nonexistent conspiracies.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

I'm not commenting on her judicial record, or suggesting that she ought to be impeached. It is interesting however to note the character of people who attain high office, or reach an elevated judgeship in our courts. I'm not sure how Roy Moore now fits into this discussion, but I'll assume it's attempt #2 to do the 'whatabout whatabout whatabout'.

If you're looking for the ultimate whatabout comparison, try Judge Kozinski from the 9th Circuit Court in California. While presiding over a case involving indecency (beastiality porn) Judge Kozinski was outed as operating his own website that hosted beastiality inspired photos.

9th Circuit's chief judge posted sexually explicit matter on his website

Roy Moore just got whatabouted to upstanding citizen status, if you want to play morality ping pong.

My point, since it went over your head, is that I'm not up to speed on Judge Wood's private life. It's likely that she's perfectly suited for office and that the right is just doing what it always does by calling her a Clinton associate in order to undermine the credibility of her presiding over the Cohen case.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

The nanny story isn't relevant to the Cohen's defense, just discussing because it was a part of US history. Cohen isn't in Rikers yet, so don't think about his fat ass so much.

Cohen better come up with a story...Fast....Or he'll be hanging out in Rikers...We'll you bring him some Banana Bread?
 
George Stephanopoulos should begin everything he does, to include things like his interview with Comey, with "Hi, I'm George Stephanopoulos and I was the communications director for Bill Clinton's presidential campaign." You know...cuz ya'll want to be consistent, right?

Sigh.....A media person with bias...Gosh at least Sean Hannity is fair and balanced?....Right?.....LOL
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

It's only a crime if you can't afford a nanny or a baby sitter.

Congratulations. You have successfully identified that leaving a young child or infant alone is a crime and that leaving a young child or infant with a person old enough to take care of the young child or infant is not a crime.

Gee, she only had to wreck 2 marriages & 2 families in order to git her a rich husbind.

You're calling an attorney and district court judge a gold digger without any evidence in the world. That's transparent. And classless.

 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

It's worthless to counter you. You don't know anything about the law, you make up grade school interpretations of legal concepts, and you refuse to accept the truth when it's given to you in an impartial manner. That's called irrational; and it's a waste of one's time to argue with an irrational person. It's like trying to teach molecular physics to an advanced Alzheimer's patient.

Uh , he is living in the Mtns of Panama....So there is that....Pretty much explains it
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

Can anyone sane tell me why this matters? Aren't Trump and Hannity friends. Not a surprise they would have a lawyer that has represented both of them before.

Hannity railed against the Cohen investigation to his audience of millions without disclosing his association with Cohen. That isn't ethical. Then Cohen and his attorneys desperately tried to keep Hannity a secret because Hannity told them to over the weekend. That's why it matters.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

Two reasons:

They want Hannity silenced. Their agenda can't handle being challenged. In the long run, they wabt all dissent silenced.

They want to burn everyone even remotely connected to President Trump, so they can isolate him. It'll be easier to overthrow, I mean impeach him.

Except no one knew we were talking about Hannity until this happened. Go play your conspiracy games in the proper subforum.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

Except no one knew we were talking about Hannity until this happened. Go play your conspiracy games in the proper subforum.

I'll participate un this thread. Thank you.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

There's no law that makes it legal to hire illegal aliens.

There wasn't until 1986, which was after Wood hired her nanny. As JMR suggested, please read up before slandering judges.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

I'll participate un this thread. Thank you.

and elevate the discourse!
 
CNN attorney is responsible for the abuse of power in releasing Hannitys name...Andrew McCarthy lays it out in his article today.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Is CNN also responsible for the court ruling from 1993 that established the legal precedent? Typical smear campaign.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

Do you think that should extend to reporters and other pundits? Should they disclose who they voted for and how much they contributed to campaigns when reporting on political issues?

And I agree Hannity should have disclosed his connection to Cohen.

Uh, yeah, ethics apply to reporters. How a person votes does not create a conflict of interest. That's a myth that the right invented after it elected the current president.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

So she hired the nanny in March of 1986, and the employment of the nanny wasn't made illegal until November of 1986. The nanny was illegally employed by Wood for a period of 1 year, as she didn't become legal until December of 1987. I understand why Wood recused herself. Whether she had violated the law or not, it didn't look good for a prospective Attorney General of the United States to have done what she did.

No, it was never illegal to employ an illegal immigrant who was hired before November of 1986. In fact, it still is not illegal today. Wood never violated the law.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

How does it serve the criminal investigation?

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

Jesus ****ing christ. Read this carefully. Cohen himself made a motion to the court. He started the entire thing. In order for the judge to rule on the motion that Cohen himself presented to the court, she needed the names of his clients. That's how it serves the criminal investigation.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client[W:1086]

No, I won’t. Moving on.


Sent from my iPhone X using Telepathy.

You won't read the OP? Then you should stop posting and be moving on to somewhere else.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

You are so far off base, you are not even in the ballpark. Check out all The undisclosed connections that the rest of the media has with their Democrat co-conspirators. Plenty of it in the news today. Way bigger that Hannity speaking to a guy.

Fine for the left to be in bed with anyone they can possibly think of, but Hannity talks to someone, and IQ’s on the left drop to double digits. I’m banning myself from this thread, it might be contagious.


Sent from my iPhone X using Telepathy.

Why don't you list some known undisclosed conflicts of interest between the media and Democrats? Please be specific. If you can't, then I will know you're just spewing nonsense. Again.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

Height of silliness. Lots written yet truly vapid, repetitively so.

That you dont, simply refuse to accept valid interpretations of our Constitution that conflict with your overly narrow adherence to those of the bandwagon heading our nation off a cliff... isnt a problem I can solve. The law, as its come to be, has diluted our rights...and as they are OUR rights, not the government's, not the lawyers, certainly not an amateur's to intrepret them away from us.

We will be taking them back now.

Hannity owns HIS name. That is PROPERTY. NOBODY else owns it unless he freely gives of it. PERIOD. Deny it. To deny it is to love the law but to loathe, disdain justice.

The court, and I really couldnt give a pinched loaf whether you agree or not, just as being ugly, fat or a fool isnt illegal so you are allowed, the court has NO RIGHT, none, to Hannity's name. Doesnt belong to the government. Keep arguing for the overpowering state, statists do as statist will, but must be constantly opposed...

You are simply trying to drag me into agreeing with faulty law. Unjust law. It aint happening. You can ridicule, you can harp, cajole, complain all you care to...if its not just, it should not be. We are here to improve, to form a more perfect union, not devolve back into that which our founders fought against.

You may well understand "law", doubtful as that point is far from proven, but what is dismally, repeatedly plain to see is you havent the slightest concept, nor concern, of Justice.

I am never embarrassed to take ANY righteous stand. The Constitution was built rugged, tough, it can certainly take my takings interpretation. If it can take the embarrassment of granting the right of privacy to the extent of allowing mass infanticide, homicides by the tens of millions, it can certainly weather my little tempest here.

I am well within my rights, no where near out of bounds. Surprise surprise surprise, you dont make common sense nor the rules nor even a interesting read. :lamo

Seeing as you keep passing yourself off as a legal expert, I ll ask again, just what are your bone fides? By the way, the 14th didnt amend the BOR, it extended, incorporated them.

You are embarrassing yourself so badly. Hannity owns his name, does he? Then you must have received his permission to use it. May we see the license he gave you to use his property? And the Fourteenth Amendment amended the Constitution. That's what amendment means. Please tell me you're still in high school or something.
 
Sigh.....A media person with bias...Gosh at least Sean Hannity is fair and balanced?....Right?.....LOL

Nope, he isn't either but at least you look amazing making a false assumption about what I think/believe.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

Just how hard is it to figure out that I have understood that from the very beginning? Question is why can you folks not understand, apparently almost to the degree of an impossibility, that the court most certainly can know, but it is not a requirement to make everything scooped up in raid be made available to the public.

Otherwise social security numbers should be released.

To make a person's SSN public would cause that person harm. A name is not an SSN. So that's a failed comparison.
 
Re: Sean Hannity revealed as Michael Cohen’s 3rd client

I know, right?

They dont even do that with conservative judges.

And you know they wamt to. I think they know if that were to ever start there would probably start an avalache. Since they cannot win at the ballot box, they so often now go through the courts to get what they want. If impeachment for pure rank partisanship were to become the possiblity, not even the rule, that might send an unwanted (to any cheater judges, either side) message that maybe they better hand down bias free, Constitutionally sound and based judgements.

Its great to have an independent judiciary ...unless and until they begin ruling against that which makes America great.

Oh, so you like an independent judiciary only so far as it issues rulings like you like. Brilliant.
 
Back
Top Bottom