• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Exclusive: FBI seized recordings between Trump's lawyer and Stormy Daniels' former lawyer

Actually, the overwhelming majority of Americans (57%) think Trump is unfit to be President. Oh, wait, the 57% number was based on polls in Sept and Dec 2017. There is a new one out.... now the number is 56% that think Trump is unfit.

https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/q...val-fit-to-be-president/2017/09/27/id/816161/


Its only a majority of Republicans who give Trump a pass on his integrity. Fortunately, Republicans (including those that identify themselves as such) represent only 37% of the population. A majority of a minority is still a minority.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/republican-percentage-drops-gallup_us_5a2dbf49e4b069ec48ae6aec

Full disclosure: I dont place much trust in polls meant more to influence than inform, first off ....

But...pretty damned good percentages for an American public being bombarded 24/7/818 and counting by constant "bombshells " of "Russian collusion" and, when that hoax collapsed, the stupid "obstruction" then "mentally unfit" after which a ten year old one night stand ..all this.by a biased media, according to the Harvard study, that is presenting negative stories about President Trump at a minimum rate of 91% of the time.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...age-has-been-negative/?utm_term=.7225b70a5614

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/19/harvard-study-trump-most-negative-coverage/

In answer to your statement, its mainly only the Republicans because we keep up with real, more fair and even handed news, not just near total fake news. I imagine, before he OIG report came out, for instance, you might have believed, amid the relentless influence of all the negative and false reporting, that Andrew McCabe was fired by President Trump and fired unjustly, right?

Now the ostensibly more informed folks on this site, even an overwhelming majority of the generally clueless slackers here, can no longer avoid the truth that McCabe lied 4 times, at least two of those times under oath, in furtherence of his own personal over FBI duties and obligations ...and this then was the reason that the Office of Professional Responsibility AND the Inspector General recommended that he be fired and AG Sessions followed those recs and fired his ass. Right?

But that, with a near totally compromised media, is very slow news to filter across a nation fed a constant diet of anti Trump news (read: lying propaganda).

So... whats your excuse?
 
I'm not sure I follow...if all of this is going on, it is because it happened. If Trump got elected by flagrantly violating laws intended to keep our elections fair and honest, how is that even right?

If the Trump campaign didn't do anything illegal (speaking of major crimes, not piddly minor ones), then they should have absolutely nothing to worry about. So what does it say about them when they are constantly lying about meetings they've had? Lying about e-mails they exchanged? Why is the President publicly bemoaning the fact Jeff Sessions won't breach policy/law and shut down the investigation?

Donald Trump is acting like a man who has committed major crimes and is trying to hide it. Whether he did or not, we'll find out, but he (and so many of his campaign team) are acting very guilty.

Well, if the Trump campaign conspired with a foreign government to aid them in gaining the Presidency, if the President is (as some have claimed) compromised by the same foreign government who helped elect him, I'd say the expense would be that we would have worked to restore the integrity in our elections.

If it comes out the Trump campaign committed major violations, then shouldn't that be punished? Surely you do not support a country where winning an election by flagrantly violating laws is okay if the candidate belongs to the correct party, do you?

This has nothing to do with liberals. Donald Trump appointed Rod Rosenstein, a Republican. Rosenstein hired Mueller, a Republican, to investigate after Trump fired Comey, a Republican. The Republican federal prosecutor in NY (the one who recused himself) was appointed by Donald Trump.

This isn't about liberals or establishment. This is about the rule of law.

And if you are concerned about division being sown, then you CANNOT support this President. This President INTENTIONALLY sows division to better his political ambitions. He's not divisive because of his policies, he intentionally tries to divide to stir up his base, regardless of the policy. You cannot claim to be against division and support this President.

This is very well said. Agree with all your points.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
That's just not true. We have already been provided with several pieces of evidence that there may be something.

He has not been convicted of anything, but, again, he is acting like a man who has something to hide.

Stormy has little to do with Mueller's investigation, with the possible exception of Cohen's activities.

That's not a "when did you stop beating your wife" scenario, it's a hypothetical. Hypothetically speaking, if they were to have committed major violations, should they be excused simply because of their party affiliation?

Not being a Trump supporter doesn't make someone a liberal. And, again, Donald Trump appointed Rosenstein...

So what you're saying is Mueller cares more about doing what's right?

:roll:

First of all, the investigation is being headed by a Republican. Second of all, "The special counsel’s office pointed out to us that the legal standards for Justice Department hiring "prohibit the use of political or ideological affiliations to assess applicants.""
How many 'Democrat campaign donors' on special counsel team probing Trump campaign-Russia ties? | PolitiFact Wisconsin

J-Mac, if you think Trump is squeaky clean, then you have not been paying much attention.

No, I'm telling you who you CAN'T support if you care about division being sown.

If that's a concern, you cannot support this President.

It's not an opinion, it's his tactic. He regularly sows division in his speeches and on Twitter. Hell, the man ended DACA and then blamed Democrats for ending DACA.

It's not an opinion, it's just a fact.

No, I expect a President to be presidential. Obama dealt with far worse than what Trump is dealing with and he never acted the way Trump has acted.

It has nothing to do with liberals, conservatives or anyone else. It has to do with the behavior of the President and his team. We KNOW Sessions met with Russians and lied about it. We know Michael Flynn has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about conversations he had with Russians. We know Trump Jr., Kushner and Manafort met with a Russian attorney to get dirt on Clinton and then lied about it. We know Papadapolous lied to the FBI about his involvement with the Trump campaign and we know he shot his mouth off to an Australian diplomat about compromising material the Russians had on Clinton. We know the Russians actively interfered in our election, to Trump's benefit. We know Roger Stone claimed to be in contact with Wikileaks and foreshadowed Wikileaks release of e-mails. We know Trump made concerted efforts to start business in Russia. We know Cohen claimed to never be in Prague, but it now appears he was (as detailed in the Steele dossier). We know Cohen and Keith Davidson seemed to keep running into each other when creating NDAs for mistresses and we have not heard a believable tale as to where the money came from. We know Kushner couldn't get a security clearance (even after having to revise his form several times for his omissions), Sessions had to recuse himself from the Russia investigation, Comey was fired by Trump for "the Russia thing", etc.

The idea there is no evidence and that this is just sour grapes after an election simply does not conform with reality.

Yes yes yes to all of this!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Full disclosure: I dont place much trust in polls meant more to influence than inform, first off ....

But...pretty damned good percentages for an American public being bombarded 24/7/818 and counting by constant "bombshells " of "Russian collusion" and, when that hoax collapsed, the stupid "obstruction" then "mentally unfit" after which a ten year old one night stand ..all this.by a biased media, according to the Harvard study, that is presenting negative stories about President Trump at a minimum rate of 91% of the time.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...age-has-been-negative/?utm_term=.7225b70a5614

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/19/harvard-study-trump-most-negative-coverage/

In answer to your statement, its mainly only the Republicans because we keep up with real, more fair and even handed news, not just near total fake news. I imagine, before he OIG report came out, for instance, you might have believed, amid the relentless influence of all the negative and false reporting, that Andrew McCabe was fired by President Trump and fired unjustly, right?

Now the ostensibly more informed folks on this site, even an overwhelming majority of the generally clueless slackers here, can no longer avoid the truth that McCabe lied 4 times, at least two of those times under oath, in furtherence of his own personal over FBI duties and obligations ...and this then was the reason that the Office of Professional Responsibility AND the Inspector General recommended that he be fired and AG Sessions followed those recs and fired his ass. Right?

But that, with a near totally compromised media, is very slow news to filter across a nation fed a constant diet of anti Trump news (read: lying propaganda).

So... whats your excuse?

First of all, media bias works both ways, so I can certainly turn on Fox News to get my fill of right wing propaganda and talking points that would put POTUS on a pedestal, even if he shot someone. I would never do that because Fox News is complete garbage, but you can't sit there and say anti trump News is propaganda. Trump is so much of a dumpster fire that even unbiased sources of information (such as BBC News, Reuters, NPR) seem biased to trump supporters. But that's the reality of it all. Anti-trump has essentially become the norm and the truth because trumps presidency is nothing but chaos, because he is a chaos president. Unless you watch Fox News 24/7, which is clearly one of the only outliers propping up this administration (and giving trump advice, because they know he's watching, which reminds me of State TV). I would much rather read and digest news sources that don't have obvious bias but I can't help it if NPR or Reuters is reporting all of the scandals in the Trump Administration because that's the reality of what's going on. There are more negative stories about trump because, well, there's not many positive stories to report. How many times can you report about the economy and job numbers doing well? Of course all media has some bias, that's not news. But if you are going to claim a huge portion of the media is anti trump, the other side will claim that breitbart and Fox News is pro-trump. It kind of works both ways. Which is why I try to stick to sources that don't provide their own lens and make us think on our own. But seriously, most news is anti trump because that's just what is actually happening. Between the constant revolving door at the WH, people resigning left and right, ethical scandals between the president and his staff, and now the Cohen scandal (the president's personal attorney getting raided by the FBI is a pretty huge deal, even to sane republicans, don't ya think?) ... please tell me how reporting either of these can NOT sound anti trump? I'm actually reading an article in NPR right now about how Mueller's favorability has dropped. That's not anti trump, correct? Maybe you need to change up your sources, the TV sounds like it's getting to you! And I never read anywhere that said McCabe was fired by trump. I never once thought that, either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
First of all, media bias works both ways, so I can certainly turn on Fox News to get my fill of right wing propaganda and talking points that would put POTUS on a pedestal, even if he shot someone. I would never do that because Fox News is complete garbage, but you can't sit there and say anti trump News is propaganda. Trump is so much of a dumpster fire that even unbiased sources of information (such as BBC News, Reuters, NPR) seem biased to trump supporters. But that's the reality of it all. Anti-trump has essentially become the norm and the truth because trumps presidency is nothing but chaos, because he is a chaos president. Unless you watch Fox News 24/7, which is clearly one of the only outliers propping up this administration (and giving trump advice, because they know he's watching, which reminds me of State TV). I would much rather read and digest news sources that don't have obvious bias but I can't help it if NPR or Reuters is reporting all of the scandals in the Trump Administration because that's the reality of what's going on. There are more negative stories about trump because, well, there's not many positive stories to report. How many times can you report about the economy and job numbers doing well? Of course all media has some bias, that's not news. But if you are going to claim a huge portion of the media is anti trump, the other side will claim that breitbart and Fox News is pro-trump. It kind of works both ways. Which is why I try to stick to sources that don't provide their own lens and make us think on our own. But seriously, most news is anti trump because that's just what is actually happening. Between the constant revolving door at the WH, people resigning left and right, ethical scandals between the president and his staff, and now the Cohen scandal (the president's personal attorney getting raided by the FBI is a pretty huge deal, even to sane republicans, don't ya think?) ... please tell me how reporting either of these can NOT sound anti trump? I'm actually reading an article in NPR right now about how Mueller's favorability has dropped. That's not anti trump, correct? Maybe you need to change up your sources, the TV sounds like it's getting to you! And I never read anywhere that said McCabe was fired by trump. I never once thought that, either.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your own total bias acknowledged (apparently unknowingly by you ) by your post is typical confirmation bias. We all suffer this same malady to some extent, just you lefties have terminal cases yet cannot see it in yourselves at all and so believe the BBC and NPR are somehow neutral honest arbiters of the news. I guess when one hits the terminal stages some of the side effects are blindness and being tone deaf.

Yes, raiding the personal atty of the president IS A PRETTY HUGE SCANDAL. You want somebody, a left leaning Democrat that openly confesses he voted for Hillary...but still has integrity for the rules, our rule of law and the Constitution...see what famous propounder of equality of rights lawyer and professor of law, Alan Dershowitz logically asserts about this gross overstep.

They better have more rock solid evidence against Cohen than we currently know... or many folks, including colluding judges, will be going to jail themselves when we have final conclusion of this mess.
 
Your own total bias acknowledged (apparently unknowingly by you ) by your post is typical confirmation bias. We all suffer this same malady to some extent, just you lefties have terminal cases yet cannot see it in yourselves at all and so believe the BBC and NPR are somehow neutral honest arbiters of the news. I guess when one hits the terminal stages some of the side effects are blindness and being tone deaf.

Yes, raiding the personal atty of the president IS A PRETTY HUGE SCANDAL. You want somebody, a left leaning Democrat that openly confesses he voted for Hillary...but still has integrity for the rules, our rule of law and the Constitution...see what famous propounder of equality of rights lawyer and professor of law, Alan Dershowitz logically asserts about this gross overstep.

They better have more rock solid evidence against Cohen than we currently know... or many folks, including colluding judges, will be going to jail themselves when we have final conclusion of this mess.

I'm not a "leftie". But thanks for assuming such a thing. What sources would you direct me to, then, since you're clearly more knowledgeable than the rest of us? Please, do share.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
IOW, you wanted Trump to NOT be who he is...I call BS...You banked on it.....Comey wasn't a hero of the left until he outed that he was totally in the tank politically trying to help Hillary, then working to sink Trump....What is happening now, is a disgrace...And people like yourself that are in here gleefully cheering for this are the problem IMHO.

I don't know why you would call anything a disgrace. The American legal system is working the way it is supposed to, and evidence will lead just where it is supposed to, and the final judgement will be fair.
 
I'm not a "leftie". But thanks for assuming such a thing. What sources would you direct me to, then, since you're clearly more knowledgeable than the rest of us? Please, do share.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe only one, CSPAN, and that only without additional side commentary.

All news with added human commentary will necessarily have a bias. I attempt to target an issue and search myself, knowing that even the algorithms for search in those engines, as has been established by many studies, are now clearly left biased.

I am in Panama and data is expensive and internet slow and intermittent here so do not have unlimited means... but when able watch youtube and other sites videos on politics and other items of interest. I ll watch, targeted and for flavor Fox, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, TYT, Jones, Lionel, etc...read articles from nearly anyplace I find what I think to be valid information. I have a large collection of books, both real, virtual and audio that have helped in forming my views on what is real, what is truth, what is pertinent and what is not.

Here on site I get a synthesis of allied and opposing views. Many here are just here to simply vent by pulling the ring and toss in a drive by verbal handgrenade without much thought or mental/research preparation...in other words spewing while parrotting party positions they havent thought very deeply about.

I can learn things from targeted opponents here as well. The ones that do actually do some research, do put up, if not valid arguments, actually argued points which I consider and do more research to bolster my points if the opposing argument is still lacking in convincing me otherwise.

Its why I offer up Dershowitz, I dont always agree with him, but he seems more often than not to be very well acquainted with logic, the law and the circumstances and argues straight up what all that gets him.
 
Full disclosure: I dont place much trust in polls meant more to influence than inform, first off ....

But...pretty damned good percentages for an American public being bombarded 24/7/818 and counting by constant "bombshells " of "Russian collusion" and, when that hoax collapsed, the stupid "obstruction" then "mentally unfit" after which a ten year old one night stand ..all this.by a biased media, according to the Harvard study, that is presenting negative stories about President Trump at a minimum rate of 91% of the time.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...age-has-been-negative/?utm_term=.7225b70a5614

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/19/harvard-study-trump-most-negative-coverage/

In answer to your statement, its mainly only the Republicans because we keep up with real, more fair and even handed news, not just near total fake news. I imagine, before he OIG report came out, for instance, you might have believed, amid the relentless influence of all the negative and false reporting, that Andrew McCabe was fired by President Trump and fired unjustly, right?

Now the ostensibly more informed folks on this site, even an overwhelming majority of the generally clueless slackers here, can no longer avoid the truth that McCabe lied 4 times, at least two of those times under oath, in furtherence of his own personal over FBI duties and obligations ...and this then was the reason that the Office of Professional Responsibility AND the Inspector General recommended that he be fired and AG Sessions followed those recs and fired his ass. Right?

But that, with a near totally compromised media, is very slow news to filter across a nation fed a constant diet of anti Trump news (read: lying propaganda).

So... whats your excuse?
]]

So, we all appreciate your concession that what you really meant by "the overwhelming majority of Americans are not concerned with the sex life, especially 10 years stale, of the known playboy we elected", was the overwhelming majority of Republicans, as I have shown you that the overwhelming majority of American's think Trump is unfit for office - they are concerned about Trump the person. I agree with you the overwhelming majority of Republicans don't care, IMHO, proving they have no real values...

So, it seems by your words per above, you single out Republicans because you think they are better informed? Wow. You can't make that claim with evidence supporting your position. Meanwhile, allow me to show you my evidence to suggest they are actually less informed and rather incestuous with regard to their news gathering (translated: they tend to get their news from very limited sources, that primarily tell them what they want to hear)

Survey: Conservatives Cluster Around One News Source | Time
https://www.vox.com/2016/4/1/11340882/republicans-democrats-media-fox

What also strikes me in your post is your whining about the negative coverage Trump gets, as if he is somehow he is just a humble little old President that is just misunderstood. If only the media wasn't so mean, we might all learn to like and appreciate him..... Wow! Really?

First off, media management is the President's job. If he is getting bad press, he is either doing something very wrong and/or is very poor at press management. Let me help you: both are at play. On press management, he is the guy the coined the term "fake news" to counter every story he does not like. Lies in the press? Please? Trump has no moral foundation to make that statement since he lies a lot, and always has....

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/23/opinion/trumps-lies.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-claims-over-355-days/?utm_term=.9bd65fdab03a
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/01/politics/donald-trump-sotu-ratings/index.html
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/01/donald-trump-lies-liar-effect-brain-214658
https://www.factcheck.org/person/donald-trump/
https://www.vogue.com/article/donald-trump-lies-200-days

To be continued....
 
.....continued....

Trump gets bad press because he does bad things. He is a man of little character as evidenced by his three marriages, countless affairs, four bankruptcies, aggressive business practices (not paying his bills), and racist/bigoted tendencies.

Donald Trump?s business disaster is worse than you think - MarketWatch
Opinion | Trump, the Bad, Bad Businessman - The New York Times
Donald Trump's Many Business Failures, Explained
Is Donald Trump a Successful Businessman? Not Really. | Daily Wire

Face it: decent Americans are appalled at his classless and crass approach to the Presidency. Trump has behaved in ways we have never seen from a US President, a position that comes with a certain sense of honor and decorum that seems way above his trailer trash pay grade.

Trump's lack of preparation of the job, his arrogance, ignorance and temperament were widely known before the election. This is why he received NO endorsements from major US newspapers, including staunch conservative papers (such as the Arizona Republic, Dallas Morning News, USA Today and Cincinnati Enquirer) who told us in 2016 that Trump was unfit for the job. You should read some of them...

https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2016/09/07/recommend-hillary-clinton-us-president
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/op...dorses-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/90728344/
http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/editorial/2016/09/27/hillary-clinton-endorsement/91198668/

Trump has done very little to prove any of those editorials wrong. In fact, he has acted even worse, in many cases, to the fears articulated in those arguments. Bad press? No, bad behavior from a US President.

A very large percentage of AMERICANS thought Trump was unfit for office in 2016. Fortunately for Trump, there were enough people willing to give him a chance. Now, with 56-57% that think he is unfit (a steady number since the Quinnipiac poll first came out in Sept 2017, well before anyone heard of Stormy Daniels), many that gave him the chance see the err of their ways. Oddly, 40% love him.... they are the ones willing to look the other way on his obvious shortcomings.... OK, that is America.

Meanwhile, you should stop with this narrative of fake news, polls are real, and the press is mean, as they add up to paint a picture of someone that is not in touch with reality. Recognize that you are merely willing to look the other way. Meanwhile, you are in the minority. Its ok, right now we have minority rule in America. Its a bit of anomaly, but it does happen, on occasion, in our system. If, however, you don't respect the fact that you are in the minority, the majority will eventually run you out.

PS - I have no idea what McCabe has to do with any of this. Are you whinning? If you wish to argue the merits of the Trump/Russia investigation, I am more than happy to do so..... on another thread.
 
Last edited:
.....continued....

Trump gets bad press because he does bad things. He is a man of little character as evidenced by his three marriages, countless affairs, four bankruptcies, aggressive business practices (not paying his bills), and racist/bigoted tendencies.

Donald Trump?s business disaster is worse than you think - MarketWatch
Opinion | Trump, the Bad, Bad Businessman - The New York Times
Donald Trump's Many Business Failures, Explained
Is Donald Trump a Successful Businessman? Not Really. | Daily Wire

Face it: decent Americans are appalled at his classless and crass approach to the Presidency. Trump has behaved in ways we have never seen from a US President, a position that comes with a certain sense of honor and decorum that seems way above his trailer trash pay grade.

Trump's lack of preparation of the job, his arrogance, ignorance and temperament were widely known before the election. This is why he received NO endorsements from major US newspapers, including staunch conservative papers (such as the Arizona Republic, Dallas Morning News, USA Today and Cincinnati Enquirer) who told us in 2016 that Trump was unfit for the job. You should read some of them...

https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2016/09/07/recommend-hillary-clinton-us-president
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/op...dorses-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/90728344/
http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/editorial/2016/09/27/hillary-clinton-endorsement/91198668/

Trump has done very little to prove any of those editorials wrong. In fact, he has acted even worse, in many cases, to the fears articulated in those arguments. Bad press? No, bad behavior from a US President.

A very large percentage of AMERICANS thought Trump was unfit for office in 2016. Fortunately for Trump, there were enough people willing to give him a chance. Now, with 56-57% that think he is unfit (a steady number since the Quinnipiac poll first came out in Sept 2017, well before anyone heard of Stormy Daniels), many that gave him the chance see the err of their ways. Oddly, 40% love him.... they are the ones willing to look the other way on his obvious shortcomings.... OK, that is America.

Meanwhile, you should stop with this narrative of fake news, polls are real, and the press is mean, as they add up to paint a picture of someone that is not in touch with reality. Recognize that you are merely willing to look the other way. Meanwhile, you are in the minority. Its ok, right now we have minority rule in America. Its a bit of anomaly, but it does happen, on occasion, in our system. If, however, you don't respect the fact that you are in the minority, the majority will eventually run you out.

PS - I have no idea what McCabe has to do with any of this. Are you whinning? If you wish to argue the merits of the Trump/Russia investigation, I am more than happy to do so..... on another thread.

Amen to all of this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
.....continued....

Trump gets bad press because he does bad things. He is a man of little character as evidenced by his three marriages, countless affairs, four bankruptcies, aggressive business ...

***

Face it: decent Americans are appalled at his classless and crass approach to the Presidency. Trump has behaved in ways we have never seen from a US President, a position that comes with a certain sense of honor and decorum that seems way above his trailer trash pay grade.

***


Trump has done very little to prove any of those editorials wrong. In fact, he has acted even worse, in many cases, to the fears articulated in those arguments. Bad press? No, bad behavior from a US President.

***
Meanwhile, you should stop with this narrative of fake news, polls are real, and the press is mean, as they add up to paint a picture of someone that is not in touch with reality. Recognize that you are merely willing to look the other way. Meanwhile, you are in the minority. Its ok, right now we have minority rule in America. Its a bit of anomaly, but it does happen, on occasion, in our system. If, however, you don't respect the fact that you are in the minority, the majority will eventually run you out.

PS - I have no idea what McCabe has to do with any of this. Are you whinning? If you wish to argue the merits of the Trump/Russia investigation, I am more than happy to do so..... on another thread.
Actually...

It was folks like JFK, LBJ, Teddy K, Bill Clinton that taught us that WE as a people dont much care what a President does in his private sex life. Within bounds, of course with JFK, Teddy and BJ certainly extending those limits. When BJ's escapades came out it was my first year teaching. 9th graders, just coming outta middle school and guess how common became discussions of the President, oral sex worked its way into the global studies class? Commonplace by way before the end of the school year.

Pretty sleazy. So I cannot really hear your whimp whimp whimpering about how bad Donny Trump is made out to be. I ve known, it was beyond commonly known as it was widely publicized, all my life of fabled Trumps adept Lotharianism. He was always the Don #Juan.

Its not news, its olds, man.

You send me a ton of purely negative opinion...not much pertinent truth involved. Does go towards proving the minimum 91% negative coverage in the Harvard study I referenced. Hat tip.

You say Trump has done nothing good. Who between slenderman and Trump did better with:

1. GDP growth
2. Bringing companies back w investments and jobs
3. Bringing foreign companies w/ investments jobs
4. Stock Market
5. Illegal immigration border crossings
6. Getting rid of the individual mandate
7. Reforming taxes, spawning bonuses
8. Offer made to DACA folks
9. China rethinking trade in a manner more favorable to the US
10. Putting NATO on notice to pony up their share
11. Moving promised embassy to Jerusalem
12. Drawing a red line in Syria and following through (twice)
13. Has Kim Jung un talking denuking the Korean Peninsula

A good lucky 13 to start, not close to all the metrics involved, but a start.

I only added the MCCABE question to see if any of your sources were up to snuff. You know, not onto their "truth", rather onto the actual truth. Truth where it meets the reality. I mean it was pretty easy if they were giving you the real scoop to know McCabe had lied, that his wife had taken oh some much much more in donations from Terry McA, Clinton Foundation rep and Guv of Virginny, much more than regular state races should require, that Mcc was later in charge of investigating Hillary, that nothing ever really moved, happened but he did leak about it for personal aggrandizement...

How many of your sources called out McCabe as the bad guy in his own firing, told you the truth about who fired him and why...before the OIG on Mcc came out? Any of them? I doubt it.

No person could handle the hostile press bette than the Don. He pisses the snot outta the dopes on our side that dont yet recognize the success of his method. I dont expect you will get it either. Its like I would tell my students, you have to want to be happy, at least travelling in its direction if you ever want to wind up there. Success the same, same with truth.


Listen, in almost all public commons areas with TVs blaring I have CNN jammed down my throat. As a seeker of information I constantly randomly rove looking at issues thru several sources. So our side sees your stuff and our stuff...you see mainly only yours...you know the "straight down the middle" honestly fake news. We get, almost under duress, more perspective.

I appreciate you attempts to annex what I did say to mean what you said or meant for me to say.

If I should need somebody for that job I ll conduct interviews, thanks anyhow. :2wave::peace
 
Back
Top Bottom