• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump denies report he tried to fire special counsel Mueller

bearpoker said:
The fact that Trump has wanted to fire Mueller in the past and has considered it means that firing him is on Trumps list of options. It makes it more likely that Trump will fire him at some point.
Click to expand...

Yikes..... A Trump mind reader......
A much more pressing question, will we use military might against Syria and if we do when?
 
apdst said:
Facts proving a real crime and not an imaginary crime? Facts that were legally collected?
Click to expand...

That’s pretty funny...your implying that facts being collected over past months aren’t legal.
 
Superfly said:
You can't prove that by his apologists around here.

:doh
Click to expand...

They blindly assume that he walks on water. I'd like to see him try that.
 
Removable Mind said:
That’s hilarious. Sincerely, it is.

Your recollect of the reason for Nixon’s resignation seems to escape you. There was ample evidence to impeach and charge him with several serious crimes, but thanks to Gerald Ford, he instantly pardoned Nixon “in order to prevent the nation from being distracted” when there were other pressing issues to address.

A half dozen people closest to Nixon went to jail for crimes that Nixon would have been charged with.

It’ll be interesting to see what Trump will be charged with and to see if he tests the Constitution to see if he can pardon himself. If he can’t you know Pence will.
Click to expand...

The least charge against Nixon would have been obstruction of justice.
 
Removable Mind said:
That’s pretty funny...your implying that facts being collected over past months aren’t legal.
Click to expand...

It's possible. Surely you aren't saying that Mueller's team is above the law, nor infallable?

We already know that the whole investigation is based on false evidence and that Strzok aquired an illegal warrant. Now, we're supposed to believe that that actually have enough evidence to justify iolating attorney-client priviledge?
 
apdst said:
It's possible. Surely you aren't saying that Mueller's team is above the law, nor infallable?

We already know that the whole investigation is based on false evidence and that Strzok aquired an illegal warrant. Now, we're supposed to believe that that actually have enough evidence to justify iolating attorney-client priviledge?
Click to expand...

We? You have a mouse in your pocket?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom