• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Ex-Playboy Model Karen McDougal Sues to Break Silence on Trump

NeverTrump

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Saladin4 said:
Poor Melania.....This has to be humiliating for her...Maybe she'll go back to Transylvania
Click to expand...

Poor Melania?

She knew what she was getting when she let him climb aboard. They like the luxury, the fame, the wealth and the power.....having the toilet overflow on occasion is part of it, why you have to get used to the taste of ****.
 
Grand Mal said:
American Media, that owns the National Enquirer, paid her to keep silent? Well, isn't that a bizarre twist. Don't they usually pay for speaking up?
This is going to precipitate something outa the White House.
Click to expand...

Owner of the Enquirer is a good buddy of trump......
 
NeverTrumpGOP said:
Time's up Trump:

A former Playboy model who claimed she had an affair with Donald J. Trump sued on Tuesday to be released from a 2016 legal agreement requiring her silence, becoming the second woman this month to challenge Trump allies’ efforts during the presidential campaign to bury stories about extramarital relationships.
Click to expand...

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/20/us/ex-playboy-model-sues-to-break-silence-on-trump.html

There's a new stormy playbook in town.
Click to expand...

Why is this an issue?

This has to do with personal lives, consensual sex between adults, and gold-digging women trading sexual favors for wealth and powerful contacts.

Did these women NOT know he was married at the time? Did they NOT finagle money out of the deal? Are they simply seeking new fame and possible fortune in this new feeding frenzy of "metoo-ism"?

Are we turning into the British press where sex "scandals" based on Victorian prudishness is the order of the day? :doh

Just more, "how do I hate thee" character assassination so loved by many members of the opposition. :coffeepap:
 
Last edited:
Fearandloathing said:
Poor Melania?

She knew what she was getting when she let him climb aboard. They like the luxury, the fame, the wealth and the power.....having the toilet overflow on occasion is part of it, why you have to get used to the taste of ****.
Click to expand...


They have their own ROTO-ROOTER mobile franchise! :mrgreen:
 
Saladin4 said:
Poor Melania.....
Click to expand...

"Poor" Melania? She married for money and she got it. And when you marry for money, you pay every cent.
 
Captain Adverse said:
Why is this an issue?

This has to do with personal lives, consensual sex between adults, and gold-digging women trading sexual favors for wealth and powerful contacts.

Did these women NOT know he was married at the time? Did they not get money out of the deal? Are they simply seeking new fame and possible fortune in this new society of "metoo-ism"?

Are we turning into the British press where sex "scandals" based on Victorian prudishness is the order of the day? :doh

Just more, "how do I hate thee" character assassination so loved by many members of the opposition. :coffeepap:
Click to expand...

It's not "character assassination" if it's true. If it's true, it's just further observation of absence of character.
 
Captain Adverse said:
Why is this an issue?

This has to do with personal lives, consensual sex between adults, and gold-digging women trading sexual favors for wealth and powerful contacts.

Did these women NOT know he was married at the time? Did they not get money out of the deal? Are they simply seeking new fame and possible fortune in this new society of "metoo-ism"?

Are we turning into the British press where sex "scandals" based on Victorian prudishness is the order of the day? :doh

Just more, "how do I hate thee" character assassination so loved by many members of the opposition. :coffeepap:
Click to expand...

If it is no "Big" deal then trump and his goons can just ignore it... or Admit it and move on.....Because it is no "Big" deal
 
Cardinal said:
"Poor" Melania? She married for money and she got it. And when you marry for money, you pay every cent.
Click to expand...

She should consider going back to her homeland in Transylvania, at least there she has some standing in Wallachia and would be shown the respect her heritage deserves
 
Saladin4 said:
She should consider going back to her homeland in Transylvania, at least there she has some standing in Wallachia and would be shown the respect her heritage deserves
Click to expand...

But then she might not have money. She made the decision that her first priority was financial security, and I've been given no reason to think that priority has changed.
 
Saladin4 said:
Poor Melania.....This has to be humiliating for her...Maybe she'll go back to Transylvania
Click to expand...

I have to admit I feel bad for her, but she did know what she was getting into. I mean the guy your married to cheats on the past two wives, what the hell makes you think he won't again?
 
Cardinal said:
But then she might not have money. She made the decision that her first priority was financial security, and I've been given no reason to think that priority has changed.
Click to expand...

She is a descendant from a long line of Voivodes that date back 500 years....She will have dignity and respect....Her relatives were not people to be trifled with as the Ottoman Turks found out so long ago
 
Captain Adverse said:
Why is this an issue?

This has to do with personal lives, consensual sex between adults, and gold-digging women trading sexual favors for wealth and powerful contacts.

Did these women NOT know he was married at the time? Did they NOT finagle money out of the deal? Are they simply seeking new fame and possible fortune in this new feeding frenzy of "metoo-ism"?

Are we turning into the British press where sex "scandals" based on Victorian prudishness is the order of the day? :doh

Just more, "how do I hate thee" character assassination so loved by many members of the opposition. :coffeepap:
Click to expand...

Once again, the issue isn't the philandering. The issue is the payoff.
Are you really not alarmed at the pattern?
 
Saladin4 said:
Poor Melania.....This has to be humiliating for her...Maybe she'll go back to Transylvania
Click to expand...

Perhaps she should not have married fat, disgusting, despicable piece of **** just because he had money. When you are basically a prostitute with a long term contract....
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
Perhaps she should not have married fat, disgusting, despicable piece of **** just because he had money. When you are basically a prostitute with a long term contract....
Click to expand...

Indeed...But the women of Transylvania have been sold off for centuries as "trophy" brides.Many are taught the "dark arts" to ensnare their unsuspecting husbands...Melania may have a few tricks up her sleeve before all is said and done
 
Saladin4 said:
She should consider going back to her homeland in Transylvania, at least there she has some standing in Wallachia and would be shown the respect her heritage deserves
Click to expand...

As Representative Gowdy said, 'if you're innocent, act like it' ...
 
Captain Adverse said:
Why is this an issue?

This has to do with personal lives, consensual sex between adults, and gold-digging women trading sexual favors for wealth and powerful contacts.

Did these women NOT know he was married at the time? Did they NOT finagle money out of the deal? Are they simply seeking new fame and possible fortune in this new feeding frenzy of "metoo-ism"?

Are we turning into the British press where sex "scandals" based on Victorian prudishness is the order of the day? :doh

Just more, "how do I hate thee" character assassination so loved by many members of the opposition. :coffeepap:
Click to expand...

If the $130,000 payment by Cohen was made on behalf of Trump before the election it would be a violation of federal law that stipulates a person cannot donate more than $2,700 directly to a campaign. To my knowledge has not been legally determined why or how or if Cohen paid the money to Daniels out of his love and devotion to Trump or whether Cohen and/or Trump were motivated by reasons of questionable and illegal intent.

If the money was paid for the purpose of silencing Daniels because Trump was running for president it would be a violation of federal law for paying money to influence the election.

Cohen says the money came from him, not Trump. Trump denies everything including having an affair with Daniels. But then there is NDA, which Trump never signed but Cohen and Trump maintain is binding and legal.

If it all falls on Cohen he is in deep ****. Or then again Cohen might be convinced to come to Jesus with Mueller which could be very bad for Trump depending on Trump's involvement in the payment to Daniels. Did Trump reimburse Cohen? If so, where did the reimbursement come from?

You might remember John Edwards faced a similar issue concerning an affair and a baby that resulted. Edwards lost the nomination and went to court over the affair and the hush money.

It doesn't seem anyone is at all surprised by Trump's lack of character. He has been fairly open about the fact that he's cheated on all his wives and will **** anything that will stand still long enough. There is no argument there. Even his evangelical base is perfectly fine with it. They don't care.

The issue then isn't about morals. It is about federal election laws. There is certainly smoke there, but fire(s)? It looks fairly certain the issues will be determined by the courts.

Now another woman has stepped up with similar claims of a hush agreement in 2016.
 
Last edited:
SouthernDemocrat said:
Perhaps she should not have married fat, disgusting, despicable piece of **** just because he had money. When you are basically a prostitute with a long term contract....
Click to expand...

Sentenced to wife without parole
Doing hard time in the kitchen
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
Perhaps she should not have married fat, disgusting, despicable piece of **** just because he had money. When you are basically a prostitute with a long term contract....
Click to expand...

If you're referring to her being a call girl, the evidence for that no longer exists (if it ever did). The origin of that claim goes back to a Suzy front page article, which now can no longer be found. In fact, the only search result you'll get on this topic is on how news outlets were forced to retract the claim. If it's true that she was a sex worker then somebody went to a lot of effort at scrubbing the bejeezus out of the internet of that claim, which when you think about it is a pretty impressive accomplishment.
 
Grand Mal said:
Once again, the issue isn't the philandering. The issue is the payoff.
Are you really not alarmed at the pattern?
Click to expand...

Compared to what Bill Clinton was 1)accused of and 2)still able to remain in office after the accusations and 3) remain popular with his supporters?


soooooooooooooo............


NO, THIS DOESN'T ALARM ME.

but keep digging up the playmates. Gives you people something to do since you are pretty much powerless in government. Trump will be in office for a long time. That alone will be more painful for you than I could ever hope for. cheers
 
Cardinal said:
If you're referring to her being a call girl, the evidence for that no longer exists (if it ever did). The origin of that claim goes back to a Suzy front page article, which now can no longer be found. In fact, the only search result you'll get on this topic is on how news outlets were forced to retract the claim. If it's true that she was a sex worker then somebody went to a lot of effort at scrubbing the bejeezus out of the internet of that claim, which when you think about it is a pretty impressive accomplishment.
Click to expand...

I am referencing the fact that anyone that marries someone for money, that they are not attracted to, and don't like, is basically a prostitute on a long term contract as they have sold sex and companionship to that person. That is fine, but I am not going to feel bad for them when that person they married, just for money, ended up being a total piece of ****.
 
SouthernDemocrat said:
I am referencing the fact that anyone that marries someone for money, that they are not attracted to, and don't like, is basically a prostitute on a long term contract as they have sold sex and companionship to that person. That is fine, but I am not going to feel bad for them when that person they married, just for money, ended up being a total piece of ****.
Click to expand...

Oh, me either. I just wasn't clear on whether you were referring to the theory that she was literally a prostitute.
 
JoeTrumps said:
Compared to what Bill Clinton was 1)accused of and 2)still able to remain in office after the accusations and 3) remain popular with his supporters?


soooooooooooooo............


NO, THIS DOESN'T ALARM ME.

but keep digging up the playmates. Gives you people something to do since you are pretty much powerless in government. Trump will be in office for a long time. That alone will be more painful for you than I could ever hope for. cheers
Click to expand...

Watch my lips...

THE ISSUE ISN'T THE PHILANDERING. THE ISSUE IS THE PAYOFF. THE HUSH MONEY.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom