• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FTC Probing Facebook for Use of Personal Data, Source Says

NeverTrump

Exposing GOP since 2015
DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
25,357
Reaction score
11,557
Location
Post-Trump America
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
  • Stock Price Down.
  • Zuckerberg MIA.
  • Congress wants answers.
  • Delete Facebook movement grows.
  • Investigation warranted.


Facebook Inc. is under investigation by a U.S. privacy watchdog over the use of personal data of 50 million users by a data analytics firm to help elect President Donald Trump.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-be-probing-facebook-for-use-of-personal-data

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/20/ftc-reportedly-to-investigate-facebooks-use-of-personal-data.html

FTC declined to comment on any new investigations/news.
 
They've been selling the data for years. Anyone that thinks a classic Web 2.0 style site/app( where the users provide the content ) isn't selling their information is naive.
 
  • Stock Price Down.
  • Zuckerberg MIA.
  • Congress wants answers.
  • Delete Facebook movement grows.
  • Investigation warranted.




https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-be-probing-facebook-for-use-of-personal-data

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/20/ftc-reportedly-to-investigate-facebooks-use-of-personal-data.html

FTC declined to comment on any new investigations/news.

I believe you can't delete a facebook account, just make it inactive. Also, I am a non-user of facebook, but I really hate how many apps and companies want you to sign in through Facebook.
 
They've been selling the data for years. Anyone that thinks a classic Web 2.0 style site/app( where the users provide the content ) isn't selling their information is naive.

Sure, but other countries don't all allow that. Should it be this way in the future? In the U.S. we create the wild-west, and only consider reigning something in if people are dying, or it causes some bubble/scandal of significant size. Then we have to fight conservatives/corporations to get things changed. It's just a matter of time before privacy blows up, this is just one example.

You are fine with private for-profits having all your data, and yet we have laws to prevent *government* from accessing data purely for safety purposes. Hell, we have Republicans yelling about FISA warrants to access information...for national security with court oversight and everything. But internet usage? Bah, anything goes! It's an absurd difference. People are easily lulled into complacency because they have not personally gotten burned.

Also, this particular case is much more complex. The general jist I saw was:
- Russian government "professor" gets access to facebook data under the guise of using it for university research (allowed)
- Sells or gives this information to Cambridge Analytica, the firm hired by Trump to run his digital troll, fake news nonsense generator (not proper use)
- Cambrdige analytica gets requests during this time from Lukoil, to explain how they are precisely targeting Americans for propaganda, lots of back and forth
- Cambridge Analytica shown on undercover camera talking about entrapment/honey pots, hiring hookers to seduce candidates, making fake deals to show corruption, etc.

Even setting aside the obvious Russia/Republican traitors....even as a non-partisan, why are we so indifferent about being manipulated at this level for a national election? Makes no sense.
 
Sure, but other countries don't all allow that. Should it be this way in the future? In the U.S. we create the wild-west, and only consider reigning something in if people are dying, or it causes some bubble/scandal of significant size. Then we have to fight conservatives/corporations to get things changed. It's just a matter of time before privacy blows up, this is just one example.

You are fine with private for-profits having all your data, and yet we have laws to prevent *government* from accessing data purely for safety purposes. Hell, we have Republicans yelling about FISA warrants to access information...for national security with court oversight and everything. But internet usage? Bah, anything goes! It's an absurd difference. People are easily lulled into complacency because they have not personally gotten burned.

Also, this particular case is much more complex. The general jist I saw was:
- Russian government "professor" gets access to facebook data under the guise of using it for university research (allowed)
- Sells or gives this information to Cambridge Analytica, the firm hired by Trump to run his digital troll, fake news nonsense generator (not proper use)
- Cambrdige analytica gets requests during this time from Lukoil, to explain how they are precisely targeting Americans for propaganda, lots of back and forth
- Cambridge Analytica shown on undercover camera talking about entrapment/honey pots, hiring hookers to seduce candidates, making fake deals to show corruption, etc.

Even setting aside the obvious Russia/Republican traitors....even as a non-partisan, why are we so indifferent about being manipulated at this level for a national election? Makes no sense.

It's because of fear of repercussions. Look at our nations children being "AstroTurf" for the DNC on the tax payers dime. (Unless we charge back the schools for the day of education billed but not performed)
 
  • Stock Price Down.
  • Zuckerberg MIA.
  • Congress wants answers.
  • Delete Facebook movement grows.
  • Investigation warranted.




https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-be-probing-facebook-for-use-of-personal-data

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/20/ftc-reportedly-to-investigate-facebooks-use-of-personal-data.html

FTC declined to comment on any new investigations/news.

Another fake news story?

I see far more hostile posts, 'ads', etc. to President Trump and/or members of this team than I see positive ones on Facebook. I also see hostile posts, 'ads', etc. sometimes justly and sometimes childishly trashing Hillary, Pelosi, Schumer et al.

This was going on long before election season got geared up this year. So what's new? Given FB's prominence in the internet world though, I am sure the FTC is looking at it for inappropriate/illegal data mining of personal information as it should be all internet commercial entities.
 
It's because of fear of repercussions. Look at our nations children being "AstroTurf" for the DNC on the tax payers dime. (Unless we charge back the schools for the day of education billed but not performed)

So a U.S. firm used by Republicans, helping Russia meddle, proposing entrapment schemes, fraud, etc., is OK because the DNC fears repercussions from the student marches?
You can understand why perhaps, your response makes sense?
 
Another fake news story?

I see far more hostile posts, 'ads', etc. to President Trump and/or members of this team than I see positive ones on Facebook. I also see hostile posts, 'ads', etc. sometimes justly and sometimes childishly trashing Hillary, Pelosi, Schumer et al.

This was going on long before election season got geared up this year. So what's new? Given FB's prominence in the internet world though, I am sure the FTC is looking at it for inappropriate/illegal data mining of personal information as it should be all internet commercial entities.

Sorry bud, the FTC is investigating facebook over this. Not fake news.
 
'Utterly horrifying': ex-Facebook insider says covert data harvesting was routine

Sandy Parakilas says numerous companies deployed these techniques – likely affecting hundreds of millions of users – and that Facebook looked the other way.

Sandy Parakilas, the platform operations manager at Facebook responsible for policing data breaches by third-party software developers between 2011 and 2012, told the Guardian he warned senior executives at the company that its lax approach to data protection risked a major breach. ..."


https://www.theguardian.com/news/20...ge-analytica-sandy-parakilas?CMP=share_btn_tw
 
The privacy of 50 million Americans is violated by Trumps digital election team which uses the stolen data to formulate targeted campaign strategies.

Americans were trapped between Russian trolls and Trump data-miners
 
The privacy of 50 million Americans is violated by Trumps digital election team which uses the stolen data to formulate targeted campaign strategies.

Americans were trapped between Russian trolls and Trump data-miners

RV, it wasn't the first time the data mining occurred. Obama did the same thing in regards to data mining.
 
The privacy of 50 million Americans is violated by Trumps digital election team which uses the stolen data to formulate targeted campaign strategies.

Americans were trapped between Russian trolls and Trump data-miners

AFAIK, The trump campaign Hired them during the primary, then used the RNC analytic system for the election.

Either way, this analysis company pushed the envelope a bit too far.
 
RV, it wasn't the first time the data mining occurred. Obama did the same thing in regards to data mining.

No, the Obama app survey (also data mining) was an opt-in (permission asked) with no hidden utensils.

The SCL survey was itself innocent, but contained a hidden app (a scraper) which sucked up the survey takers private information and also the private info of everyone on their friends list. All without the knowledge of the survey takers.

SCL then provided all of the scraped data to C.A. (funded by the Mercer family with Bannon as a VP) which used it to formulate Trump campaign strategy. ~320,000 took the SCL survey, but 50 million unknowingly had their private data scraped.
 
No, the Obama app survey (also data mining) was an opt-in (permission asked) with no hidden utensils.

The SCL survey was itself innocent, but contained a hidden app (a scraper) which sucked up the survey takers private information and also the private info of everyone on their friends list. All without the knowledge of the survey takers.

SCL then provided all of the scraped data to C.A. (funded by the Mercer family with Bannon as a VP) which used it to formulate Trump campaign strategy. ~320,000 took the SCL survey, but 50 million unknowingly had their private data scraped.

The Obama campaign went into Facebook and examined their analytics, I believe, with permission.
 
Back
Top Bottom