• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

AP: Mueller Witness is Convicted Pedophile with Shadowy Past

Former President Bill Clinton continues to remain silent about the 26 flights he took aboard convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet, dubbed the “Lolita Express,” which reportedly offered underage girls to passengers to rape.

Clinton flew on some trips where the flight logs showed only the first names of female passengers.

Between 2001 to 2003, Clinton and Epstein traveled together on extended trips around the world, according to flight records released in 2015 by Gawker.

Accompanying Clinton aboard the private jet was Doug Band, his “body man” and president of Teneo Holdings, a company that arranged speaking engagements and lucrative business deals for the former president.

On one trip Clinton also traveled with actor Kevin Spacey, who is now accused of have sex with an underage boy.

Clinton traveled aboard the “Lolita Express” with a soft core porn actress and traveled on 11 flights with Epstein’s assistant Sarah Kellen, who allegedly procured underage girls for men, according to Gawker.

Gawker reported Kellam was “accused in court filings of acting as pimps for him (Epstein), recruiting and grooming young girls into their network of child sex workers, and frequently participating in sex acts with them.”

“In January 2002, for instance, Clinton, his aide Doug Band, and Clinton’s Secret Service detail are listed on a flight from Japan to Hong Kong with Epstein, Maxwell, Kellen, and two women described only as “Janice” and “Jessica,” Gawker reported.

Clinton ditched his Secret Service agents on five of the flights, according to Fox News.

Epstein also sent his friends to his personal, 72-acre island called “Orgy Island” on Little St. James in the U.S. Virgin Islands. A team of traffickers allegedly solicited girls as young as 12 to service Epstein’s “friends,” according to Gawker. It is unknown if Clinton ever visited the island.
Click to expand...

link above

gawker was purchased by univision in 2016

party on
 
Can’t you volk read? A google search comprised of Broidy Nader UAE should serve up sufficient info for reality oriented readers to gauge the uselessness of this thread. Broidy hosted Trump at a $35,000 per plate fundee in an undisclosed Beverly Hills location, less than 72 hours ago!
There is a term for Trump, Broidy, Nader, and E. Prince...thick as thieves.
If the Prof came out of his bubble he might have understood his emphasis on Nader is ill advised, especially a day after Trump did a face to face with Broidy, as they are all under federal criminal investigation and require mundane events, like the mob takes advantage of at funerals, to securely interact
with no contrived excuse.
 
Last edited:
The Prof said:
LOL!

you better hurry up, you're already way behind, and events are moving really fast

why did contreras recuse himself from flynn?

Judicial order in Flynn case prompts new round of scrutiny | TheHill
Click to expand...

Amusing watching you change the subject in your own thread......you resort to serving up misinfo of a month ago,....
Judicial order in Flynn case prompts new round of scrutiny | TheHill
Judicial order in Flynn case prompts new round of scrutiny
BY MORGAN CHALFANT - 02/20/18 04:54 PM EST
.......The federal judge overseeing the criminal case against former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn has ordered special counsel Robert Mueller’s team to turn over any “exculpatory evidence” to his defense team.

The development generated immediate attention in conservative circles, with some seizing on the order as a potential indication that Flynn’s guilty plea had been called into question.

Judge Emmet G. Sullivan filed the order on Friday, directing federal prosecutors to produce to Flynn’s legal team “any evidence in its possession that is favorable to defendant and material either to defendant’s guilt or punishment” in a timely manner.


Sullivan’s order invoked the “Brady Rule,” which requires prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence in their possession to the defense — that is, evidence that could prove favorable to the defendant in negating his guilt, reducing his potential sentence or bolstering the credibility of a witness.

Judge Andrew Napolitano, a frequent presence on Fox News who has been hailed by President Trump, was among the voices keenly interested in Sullivan’s decision.

“The judge on his own, not in response to any application from General Flynn’s lawyers says, ‘By the way, I want all exculpatory evidence, evidence that could help Flynn or hurt the government turned over to Flynn’s lawyers,'” Napolitano said on Fox News Tuesday.

“Why would he we want that after General Flynn has already pleaded guilty? That is unheard of. He must suspect a defect in the guilty plea. Meaning, he must have reason to believe that General Flynn pleaded guilty for some reason other than guilt.”

Other legal experts cautioned that it would be premature to make such a conclusion based on the court order alone.

They pointed to Sullivan’s past work overseeing the trial of former Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), in which the judge faulted prosecutors for misconduct in failing to turn over exculpatory evidence.

Still, experts acknowledged that such an order would typically be seen as unusual, especially in cases in which the defendant has already pleaded guilty.

“It’s not unexpected coming from him,” said Jack Sharman, a lawyer at Lightfoot, Franklin & White and former Whitewater special counsel. “I think it would probably be an over-read to make a conclusion about the defect in the plea just based on this order.”......
Click to expand...

Nothing to see here.....

Some real world reporting and analysis, supported after it, by facts!:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/
No, a new court filing doesn't suggest that Michael Flynn is about to ...
Washington Post-Feb 22, 2018....
Click to expand...

Judge Emmett Sullivan, the judge who issued the order your winger sources described as unusual, is his routine according to Judge Sullivan, in this 2016 quote:
http://www.cardozolawreview.com/content/denovo/Sullivan.37.symposium.pdf
......As a result of the Stevens trial and its aftermath, I suggested that an
amendment to Rule 16 be revisited to require the government to
disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense, as set forth in Brady and
its progeny. I have also suggested that certain changes to the local rules
of the District Court for the District of Columbia would ensure that the
government is fully aware of its disclosure obligations. Finally, I now
issue a standing Brady Order in each criminal case on my docket, which
I update as the law in the area progresses. I discuss each of these efforts
below. .....
Click to expand...

Judge Praises New York's Efforts to Curb Prosecutorial Misconduct
https://www.innocenceproject.org/judge-praises-new-yorks-efforts-to-curb-prosecutor...
Nov 20, 2017 - Judge Emmet Sullivan celebrated New York's comprehensive new rule that makes New York the first in the nation to require all of its criminal trial judges to issue so-called “Brady orders” to all prosecutors in every case ...
Click to expand...

You really aren't good at what you are attempting on this forum, are you?
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
it's also kinda strange that he was moved to human resources

y'know, after having carried on and all (not that there's anything wrong with that)

with a fellow employee

both of em married

to other people

cuzza the honor and integrity of the bureau

especially on the seventh floor

don't ya think?

oh well

party on
 
you're not familiar with sulllivan, it appears

he presided over the posthumous trial of ted stevens, 2009

you remember senator stevens, how he was falsely convicted by doj, run outta the senate, died in a plane crash, only to be ultimately exonerated

i'm surprised a person with your obvious erudition and presumed passion for civil liberties could so cavalierly dismiss these egregious abuses on the part of justice

sullivan oversaw that aquittal

the point is---in doing so he blasted the doj for failure to disclose

4 Prosecutors in Stevens Case Held in Contempt - The New York Times

sullivan is a known stickler ever since on disclosure

bottom line, sullivan shouldn't have to invoke the brady act

it's prosecution's responsibility

which is why thehill is interested

did you follow the dept's troubles per disclosure in vegas, where doj went 0-4 vs clive bundy (of all people)?

and worse, got ripped outta court by her honor ramos

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/21/jeff-sessions-orders-examination-bundy-case/

cuz you gotta be pretty messed up to lose, 0-4, to clive bundy

right?

bundy was just 6 months ago

disclosure was only part of the problem in vegas, the abuses were, like i said, egregious

did you hear about the trip to burning man?

do you know about weissman in the 5th circuit and scotus, (where he lost 9-0)?

rehnquist writing for the unanimity ripped mueller's pitbull for failure to disclose, among other things

inventing crimes is one of em

remember the time judge hughes told defendant calger, "there's no factual basis for your plea"

hughes refused to accept the defendant's guilty plea cuz the judge said there was no crime

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/22/christopher-wray-robert-muellers-top-prosecutor-kn/

weissman again got shellacked

"corrupt legal practices," one of the judges said

but i don't want you to get too far afield, here

contreras/flynn/sullivan---that's about discovery

Nothing to see here
Click to expand...

after the precipitous removal of more than a dozen senior officials from doj and the fbi related to the mueller case, i'm surprised a person of your supreme scholarship could reach such a conclusion

i'd ask you, a passionate advocate of freedom, how do you look at yourself?

at least you didn't respond with the customary arm pit fart

all the best
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom