Maybe the OPR is recommending that McCabe be fired for leaking to the press?
"Justice Department expected to criticize FBI's Andrew McCabe over leaks about Hillary Clinton"
Justice Department expected to criticize FBI's Andrew McCabe over leaks about Hillary Clinton
Or maybe lying about the leak to the DOJ OIG, which could be the same charge ad FLynn lying to the FBI.
"A source told AP that McCabe is suspected of misleading internal investigators about a media leak, an allegation he denies."
https://nypost.com/2018/03/14/mccabe-could-be-fired-before-fbi-retirement/
"One aspect of the reported findings, however, stands out. According to these reports, investigators believed that McCabe misled them about his approval of a leak to the media on the Clinton investigation. An alleged false or misleading statement by McCabe could rekindle questions about how the Justice Department addresses alleged false statements within its own ranks."
If Andrew McCabe lied, could he be charged like Michael Flynn? | TheHill
Or maybe it was because he delayed the investigation of Clinton emails on Weiner's laptop.
"The DOJ inspector general, Michael Horowitz, is reportedly looking at why McCabe neglected for at least three weeks to look at new emails related to the investigation that were found on former Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y)'s laptop during the later months of the 2016 election."
WaPo: Justice IG focused on McCabe delay in examining Clinton emails on Weiner laptop | TheHill
Or maybe it was possible that he asked agents to alter their 302 investigation notes which could be obstruction of justice.
"If Horowitz can prove that senior FBI leadership ordered investigators to interfere with written evidence on an FD-302, that is the very definition of obstruction of justice. FD-302s aren’t “opinion pieces.” This could be a central part of the OIG’s report and, if the allegations are proven, it would not bode well for McCabe and others."
3 questions inspector general must answer regarding investigation of FBI leadership | TheHill
Pick just one or maybe use all four. He needs to lose his pension and possibly jail time. It isn't about payback. It's about corruption committed by the 2nd highest person in the FBI.