- Joined
- Oct 12, 2017
- Messages
- 6,805
- Reaction score
- 1,069
- Location
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
Except there was no moral equivalence. Only one side’s supporter conducted a terrorist attack. Only one side supports an ideology which thousands of Americans died crushing during the Second World War.
The president of the United States should be able to bring himself to condemn literal Nazis without feeling the need to try and pretend the other side is “just as bad” because frankly, and looking at it objectively......they aren’t as bad as the Nazis. Not even close.
What Nazis? Do you mean those 'neo-nazi' wannabees that naturally drag their knuckles to congregations of Klansmen and the like? Those morons would likely pee their pants if they ever came face to face with a real Nazi. Like that idiot who gave that stupid interview and carried on like some historical southern land owner, and then afterwards was on camera crying his little butt-hurt eyes out. What a jack-ass... Historical German Nationalists are not the type of person yer run-o-the-mill 'Billy Bob' would be equipped to handle. In my ever-so-humble opinion...of course.
2 gangs, who already hated each other, got it on, and an innocent bystander died as a result. I find the argument of 'moral equivalence' a chicken-**** way of excusing 1 of the 2 ingredients it took...to kill that woman.
But this is slightly off topic so...if you really wanna go 10 rounds about this, by all means, start a thread.