Re: GOP senators reintroduce bill to protect opponents of same-sex marriage
Oh, the polls are fake.
*Snip*
Ouch. So people who disagree with you are not part of we, the American people? That sucks.
Yeah, but Americans don't rescind rights once recognized. History, man.
Wait. You taught our children? The SC didn't write a law. The SC never writes laws. It overturned state laws in MI, OH, KY, and TN. Have you even read the Obergefell decision?
I'm screen shotting that statement. When shall we review it together again? Shall we say every year for the rest of our lives? I'm good with that because you will always be wrong.
I know many pro gay bigots on this site.
Do you read my posts? Memory a sieve? Taught high school, had thousands of students over the years, knew plenty of indoctrinated idiots in the teaching profession (its almost interminable some of these educated fools so often are, so emotional, rarely reasoned, articulate on current events) as well. Over a lifetime I have met many more hundreds having traveled a good bit of the world.
Most Americans, if asked truthfully, went along with same sex marriage when the SCOTUS made that horrible decision... but if they had their druthers, would opt out of that decision. They inherently understand how it weakens the institution, places children in non optimal formative family situations ...along with other hard hits on the institution of marriage by the lefty liberal progressive agenda...IOW, its not just gay marriage, its a multitude of liberal sins burrowing into the once solid plank of the American family unit. High rates of easy divorce, the welfare policies and periods of radical feminism which push hetro males out of the household... all and more have done tremendous damage.
Most dont care, just like myself, who you want to love, sleep with, etc
But tearing down a good nation's morals, however, and our once very strong instititions, our heritage, attacking long held American ideals and faith on so many levels on every front with an increasing and insatiable desire for more, you must be fought, defeated and denied.
The nation gave tolerance when homosexuals fought so hard crying out, righteously at that point for that...but that just didnt satisfy. A nation isnt obligated to weaken itself, lay down before these hungry reasonless, conscienceless lions who only think of todays meal, sleep, wake up to look for more prey when thats gone.
That time is past. The meek turn the other cheek days are over.
Many on that side just are not Americans in that true spirit, though by birth can consider themselves Americans with all rights of citizenship. Besides, Americans deep down are not suicidal...we see what your side offers is give aways of things that arent yours to give away.
And you just dont really know history, do you?
We dont recind rights once recognized? Are you asare how stupidly platitudinal that idea truly is? I can destroy that with a couple of questions: Was there a right implicit in our Constitution for ownership of slaves? The three-fifths compromise, the slave trade clause, and the fugitive-slave law all point to the fact it was recogized, allowed...speaking of slavery, did we Americans, have the right to work and be free of burdensome individual income taxation?...that right has evaporated...did we have the right not to have s federal government involved in nearly all, if not all, aspects of our lives? Last I checked the government had rescinded that right....more currently, those who felt we have the right to purchase or not purchase what legal products only WE decide...didnt the individual mandate under Slendermans health care atrocity rescind that right?
So give it a break, look around, study history...how about the right to practice our faith as WE see fit...yours are trying to rescind that.
It appears you have only the clues your bubble allows.
To hell the SC doesnt write and rewrite laws, what do you think they did twice with Obamacare, or with Roe v Wade. I suppose it a good thing not many lawyers go into teaching, eh?
Is there a right for same sex couples to marry in the US? Can you quote the law? No. The Supreme Court created a right where there wasnt any previously. Even with the 14th being a fraudulent amendment as it did not go through the proper and legal process as dictated in Article 5, plus it was never intended to do anything but reverse the Dred Cott decision and give rights to those recently freed from slavery by the 13th Amendment...which was, as far as I have determined, properly ratified by Article 5 process.
Screen shot to your hearts content, I wont be cowed into not speaking the truth...but I note that you didnt answer the questions about what two consenting adults can and cannot do...wonder why? Because youre wrong... and you know it.
What have you been right about?
