• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Putin tells Megyn Kelly Russia will 'never, never' extradite accused hackers to the United States

Am I the only one that finds it interesting that our gov has not made an offical legal request for these people to be extradicted. I would not expect Russia to comply but it's curious america has not formally said we want these guys and here's the evidence to justify our request. I would think we would do that much.

To be honest everyone I have my doubts about all the narratives circulating around this. I don't know how anyone can be confident about what the truth is.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk

Perhaps there is no evidence of criminality. Definitely no contravention of Russian law. So why would they even consider extraditing these individuals. Because of USA MSM stories?
/
 
Ohhhhhh, yeah!

giphy.gif
 
Perhaps there is no evidence of criminality. Definitely no contravention of Russian law. So why would they even consider extraditing these individuals. Because of USA MSM stories?
/

Um...nobody has the expectation that they will be extradited. Nobody. As to whether they will be arrested by interpol if they leave the country? That one is still very much an open question.
 
....what you fail to recognize is the indicted parties have their wings clipped by these indictments. Should they wander outside of the Russian sphere of influence (most of Europe), they are subject to arrest and extradition. Would you want to be stuck in Russia if you had the time and resource to travel the world?

...again, its not the point to actually try these guys. The point is to establish and articulate the conspiracy. You will see Americans indicted and plugged into the charges in the coming months.

I haven't failed anything. They can go anywhere except the U.S. and they won't be touched. Not unless an interpol red notice is issued.
 
Am I the only one that finds it interesting that our gov has not made an offical legal request for these people to be extradicted. I would not expect Russia to comply but it's curious america has not formally said we want these guys and here's the evidence to justify our request. I would think we would do that much.

To be honest everyone I have my doubts about all the narratives circulating around this. I don't know how anyone can be confident about what the truth is.

Sent from my SM-T800 using Tapatalk


No, I don't think it's interesting. I'm not one for doing things that are a waste of time since we don't have an extradition treaty with Russia, and they won't extradite any Russian citizen. Their constitution prohibits it.
 
Perhaps there is no evidence of criminality. Definitely no contravention of Russian law. So why would they even consider extraditing these individuals. Because of USA MSM stories?
/

You think the special counsel indicted thirteen individuals and three more entities with no evidence of criminal conduct?

The indictments are requests for extradition by definition. The Russian government refuses to honor them. If these people leave Russia and venture into more than a hundred other countries, though, they run the risk of being shipped to Mueller's offices.
 
I haven't failed anything. They can go anywhere except the U.S. and they won't be touched. Not unless an interpol red notice is issued.

That's not true. The US has extradition treaties with more than a hundred countries. Most of them apply to Mueller's indictments. Interpol red notices could expedite the arrest of the indictees if they leave Russia; and they might still be forthcoming.
 
No, I don't think it's interesting. I'm not one for doing things that are a waste of time since we don't have an extradition treaty with Russia, and they won't extradite any Russian citizen. Their constitution prohibits it.

The indictments inhibit travel and banking. That's not a waste of time.
 
The whole interview is a farce...Megyn Kelly is a lightweight...Putin is a liar and a thug...Why even bother with either
 
The whole interview is a farce...Megyn Kelly is a lightweight...Putin is a liar and a thug...Why even bother with either

agreed , Fox-news ´d give her job to this guy , he ´d fuc% Vova upside out

1418897118_d183d0bad180d0bed0bf.jpg
 
The whole interview is a farce...Megyn Kelly is a lightweight...Putin is a liar and a thug...Why even bother with either

agreed , Fox-news ´d give her job to this guy , he ´d fuc% Vova upside out

1418897118_d183d0bad180d0bed0bf.jpg
 
Has our government requested the extradition? Or just Megan Kelley?

Do you honestly think it is worth the effort? Putin is the real criminal. Why would he extradite people who he paid to do his bidding?
 
Megyn Kelly will soon join RT. So, consider this a job interview.
 
That's not true. The US has extradition treaties with more than a hundred countries. Most of them apply to Mueller's indictments. Interpol red notices could expedite the arrest of the indictees if they leave Russia; and they might still be forthcoming.

And how will those countries know they are wanted?
 
Do you honestly think it is worth the effort? Putin is the real criminal. Why would he extradite people who he paid to do his bidding?

Nope, I don't. Their constitution prohibits it anyway, not that he probably cares about that either.
 
That's not true. The US has extradition treaties with more than a hundred countries. Most of them apply to Mueller's indictments. Interpol red notices could expedite the arrest of the indictees if they leave Russia; and they might still be forthcoming.

Then they will just go to the countries that don't. Like Snowden. They can pick from these that don't have treaties:


Afghanistan
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Belarus
Botswana
Brunei
Burkina Faso
Burma
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
China (except Hong Kong)
Comoros
Congo (Kinshasa)
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Indonesia
Ivory Coast
Kazakhstan
Kuwait
Laos
Lebanon
Libya
Madagascar
Maldives
Mali
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Micronesia
Moldova
Mongolia
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nepal
Niger
Oman
Qatar
Russia
Rwanda
Samoa
São Tomé & Príncipe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Somalia
Sudan
South Sudan
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Vietnam
Yemen
 
And how will those countries know they are wanted?

Well, they might have televisions or radios or newspapers or internet access. They might also review warrants/subpoenas/indictments in sensitive locations, like airports and train stations, just like postal workers in the US look at wanted persons and missing persons posters. Did you really think that Interpol red notices are magical documents that download into the brains of humans while they sleep?
 
Then they will just go to the countries that don't. Like Snowden. They can pick from these that don't have treaties:


Afghanistan
Algeria
Andorra
Angola
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Belarus
Botswana
Brunei
Burkina Faso
Burma
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
China (except Hong Kong)
Comoros
Congo (Kinshasa)
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Indonesia
Ivory Coast
Kazakhstan
Kuwait
Laos
Lebanon
Libya
Madagascar
Maldives
Mali
Marshall Islands
Mauritania
Micronesia
Moldova
Mongolia
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nepal
Niger
Oman
Qatar
Russia
Rwanda
Samoa
São Tomé & Príncipe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Somalia
Sudan
South Sudan
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Vietnam
Yemen

They might. That's kind of the point. Did you read your list? It will be unusually difficult to leave Russia without entering a country that extradites to the US.
 
Well, they might have televisions or radios or newspapers or internet access. They might also review warrants/subpoenas/indictments in sensitive locations, like airports and train stations, just like postal workers in the US look at wanted persons and missing persons posters. Did you really think that Interpol red notices are magical documents that download into the brains of humans while they sleep?

Dude, no need for that. There have not been any red notices yet. I meant without them. You seem to think just the indictments will cause other countries to 'be on the alert'! To be honest, they probably don't really give a ****.
 
They might. That's kind of the point. Did you read your list? It will be unusually difficult to leave Russia without entering a country that extradites to the US.

Whatever. Any of those middle eastern countries that Russia is so cozy with, would be fine for them I imagine. But yeah, they will just huddle in fear and never travel again.
 
Moscow won't allow members of Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear to roam about the world. They know too much.
 
Dude, no need for that. There have not been any red notices yet. I meant without them. You seem to think just the indictments will cause other countries to 'be on the alert'! To be honest, they probably don't really give a ****.

These indictments are awfully high profile. It's not like the US is looking for a guy who didn't pay child support. My guess (and it's purely a guess) is that travel hubs have already been put on notice. If a ticket agent or security screener or someone else identifies any of these people in a cooperative country, I'm sure they'll be extradited.
 
Back
Top Bottom